Advertisement

Mobile Mapmaking: A Field Study of Gamification and Cartographic Editing

  • Manousos KamilakisEmail author
  • Konstantinos Chorianopoulos
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11747)

Abstract

Digital mapmaking has traditionally been a desktop computing activity with dedicated graphical (native or web) applications that strongly depend on the precision of mouse input. In addition, digital mapmaking also has a strong pillar on field observations, which have remained a separate task to the final mapmaking. In this work, we present to users a mobile application that combines the strengths of graphical mapmaking user interfaces with the actual geographical context into an integrated and collaborative user interface. In particular, the application implements three representative mobile mapmaking tasks (path recording, path editing and path reviewing) and includes gamification elements. A field experiment was conducted with thirty-six participants for two twenty-day periods during which they were asked to provide information about the pedestrian network of an urban region using the app. The results from questionnaire responses and contribution data showed that most users prefer recording their path, which is also the work with the lowest interaction. Moreover, gamification did not bring the expected results and the more difficult tasks were undertaken by few devoted users. Further research is needed to examine how interface design could better engage committed users in the aforementioned mapmaking task types.

Keywords

Mobile interaction Mapmaking VGI 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. Antonios Papapolizos for his valuable work in developing the app.

References

  1. 1.
    Roth, R.E.: Interactive maps: what we know and what we need to know. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013(6), 59–115 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodchild, M.F.: Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69(4), 211–221 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Panciera, K., Priedhorsky, R., Erickson, T., Terveen, L.: Lurking? Cyclopaths? A quantitative lifecycle analysis of user behavior in a geowiki. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1917–1926. ACM, April 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poplin, A., Guan, W., Lewis, B.: Online survey of heterogeneous users and their usage of the interactive mapping platform worldmap. Cartographic J. 54(3), 214–232 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kapenekakis, I., Chorianopoulos, K.: Citizen science for pedestrian cartography: collection and moderation of walkable routes in cities through mobile gamification. Hum.-centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 7(1), 10 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hara, K., Le, V., Froehlich, J.: Combining crowdsourcing and google street view to identify street-level accessibility problems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 631–640. ACM, April 2013Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hara, K., Sun, J., Moore, R., Jacobs, D., Froehlich, J.: Tohme: detecting curb ramps in google street view using crowdsourcing, computer vision, and machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 189–204. ACM, October 2014Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henze, N., Pielot, M., Poppinga, B., Schinke, T., Boll, S.: My app is an experiment: experience from user studies in mobile app stores. Int. J. Mobile Hum. Comput. Interact. (IJMHCI) 3(4), 71–91 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang, Y., Diez-Roux, A.V.: Walking distance by trip purpose and population subgroups. Am. J. Prev. Med. 43(1), 11–19 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haklay, M., Weber, P.: Openstreetmap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7(4), 12–18 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Priedhorsky, R., Masli, M., Terveen, L.: Eliciting and focusing geographic volunteer work. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 61–70. ACM, February 2010Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salomoni, P., Prandi, C., Roccetti, M., Nisi, V., Nunes, N.J.: Crowdsourcing urban accessibility: some preliminary experiences with results. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter, pp. 130–133. ACM, September 2015Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dransch, D.: User-centred human-computer interaction in cartographic information processing. In: International Cartographic Conference-ICC, pp. 1767–1774, August 2001Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brock, A.M., Hecht, B., Signer, B., Schöning, J.: Bespoke map customization behavior and its implications for the design of multimedia cartographic tools. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, pp. 1–11. ACM, November 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manousos Kamilakis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Konstantinos Chorianopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Ionian UniversityCorfuGreece

Personalised recommendations