Advertisement

Discovering the Unfindable: The Tension Between Findability and Discoverability in a Bookshop Designed for Serendipity

  • Stephann MakriEmail author
  • Yi-Chun Chen
  • Dana McKay
  • George Buchanan
  • Melissa Ocepek
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11747)

Abstract

Serendipity is a key aspect of user experience, particularly in the context of information acquisition - where it is known as information encountering. Unexpectedly encountering interesting or useful information can spark new insights while surprising and delighting. However, digital environments have been designed primarily for goal-directed seeking over loosely-directed exploration, searching over discovering. In this paper we examine a novel physical environment - a bookshop designed primarily for serendipity - for cues as to how information encountering might be helped or hindered by digital design. Naturalistic observations and interviews revealed it was almost impossible for participants to find specific books or topics other than by accident. But all unexpectedly encountered interesting books, highlighting a tension between findability and discoverability. While some of the bookshop’s design features enabled information encountering, others inhibited it. However, encountering was resilient, as it occurred despite participants finding it hard to understand the purpose of even those features that did enable it. Findings suggest the need to consider how transparent or opaque the purpose of design features should be and to balance structure and lack of it when designing digital environments for findability and discoverability.

Keywords

Information encountering Serendipity Findability Discoverability 

References

  1. 1.
    Marchionini, G.: Information seeking in electronic environments. In: Long, J. (ed.) Cambridge Series on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 9. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuhlthau, C.C.: Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. JASIST 42(5), 361–371 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellis, D.: A behavioral approach to information retrieval system design. J. Doc. 45(3), 171–212 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cunningham, S.J., Reeves, N., Britland, M.: An ethnographic study of music information seeking: implications for the design of a music digital library. In: JCDL 2003, pp. 5–16. IEEE Computer Society (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cunningham, S.J., Nichols, D.M.: Exploring social music behavior: an investigation of music selection at parties. In: ISMIR 2009, pp. Ismir (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKay, D., Buchanan, G., Chang, S.: It ain’t what you do it’s the way that you do it: design guidelines to better support online browsing. In: ASIST 2018. ASIS&T (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Makri, S., et al.: A library or just another information resource? A case study of users’ mental models of traditional and digital libraries. JASIST 58(3), 433–445 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stelmaszewska, H., Blandford, A.: From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists’ behavior in physical libraries. IJDL 4(2), 82–92 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marshall, C.C., Bly, S.: Turning the page on navigation. In: JCDL 2005, pp. 225–234. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Svenonius, E.: The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. MIT Press, Boston (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foster, A., Ford, N.: Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study. J. Doc. 59(3), 321–340 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McBirnie, A.: Seeking serendipity: the paradox of control. Aslib Proc. 60(6), 600–618 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Andre, P., et al.: Discovery is never by chance: designing for (un)serendipity. In: C&C 2009, pp. 305–314. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Makri, S., Blandford, A.: Coming across information serendipitously: Part 1 - a process model. J. Doc. 68(5), 685–704 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yadamsuren, B., Erdelez, S.: Incidental exposure to online news. In: ASIST, pp. 1–8. American Society for Information Science (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCay-Peet, L., Toms, E.G.: The process of serendipity in knowledge work. In: IIIX, pp. 377–382. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Race, T.M., Makri, S.: Accidental Information Discovery: Cultivating Serendipity in the Digital Age. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Erdelez, S.: Information encountering: a conceptual framework for accidental information discovery. In: ISIC 1997, pp. 412–421. Taylor Graham Publishing (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu, F., Jiang, T., Chi, Y.: Online information encountering: modeling the process and influencing factors. J. Doc. 71(6), 1135–1157 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Makri, S., et al.: Observing serendipity in digital information environments. ASIST Proc. 52(1), 1–10 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Makri, S., et al.: “Making my own luck”: serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments. JASIST 65(11), 2179–2194 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Erdelez, S.: Information encountering: it’s more than just bumping into information. Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 25(3), 26–29 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Björneborn, L.: Serendipity dimensions and users’ information behavior in the physical library interface. Inf. Res. 13(4) (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McCay-Peet, L., Toms, E.G.: The serendipity quotient. ASIST Proc. 48(1), 1–4 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McCay-Peet, L., Toms, E.G.: Investigating serendipity: how it unfolds and what may influence it. JASIST 66(7), 1463–1476 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Björneborn, L.: Three key affordances for serendipity: toward a framework connecting environmental and personal factors in serendipitous encounters. J. Doc. 73(5), 1053–1081 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buchanan, G., McKay, D.: In the bookshop: examining popular search strategies. In: JCDL 2011, pp. 269–278. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Trager, K.: Reading in the borderland: an ethnographic study of serious readers in a mega-bookstore café. Commun. Rev. 8(2), 185–236 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ooi, K.: How adult fiction readers select fiction books in public libraries: a study of information seeking in context. School of Information Management, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saarinen, K., Vakkari, P.: A sign of a good book: readers’ methods of accessing fiction in the public library. J. Doc. 69(5), 736–754 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hinze, A., et al.: Book selection behavior in the physical library: implications for ebook collections. In: JCDL 2012, pp. 305–314. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saarti, J.: Feeding with the spoon, or the effects of shelf classification of fiction on the loaning of fiction. Inf. Serv. Use 17(2/3), 159 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Waugh, S., McKay, D., Makri, S.: ‘Too Much Serendipity’: the tension between information seeking and encountering at the library shelves. In: CHIIR 2017, pp. 277–280. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reutzel, D.R., Gali, K.: The art of children’s book selection: a labyrinth unexplored. Read. Psychol. 19(1), 3–50 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Underhill, P.: Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping. Simon and Schuster, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Carr, P.L.: Serendipity in the stacks: libraries, information architecture, and the problems of accidental discovery. C&RL 76(6), 831–842 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rimmer, J., et al.: An examination of the physical and the digital qualities of humanities research. IP&M 44(3), 1374–1392 (2008)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cunningham, S.J., Vanderschantz, N., Timpany, C., Hinze, A., Buchanan, G.: Social information behaviour in bookshops: implications for digital libraries. In: Aalberg, T., Papatheodorou, C., Dobreva, M., Tsakonas, G., Farrugia, C.J. (eds.) TPDL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8092, pp. 84–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40501-3_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cunningham, S.J.: Children in the physical collection: implications for the digital library. In: ASIST, pp. 1–10. Association for Information Science and Technology (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    McKay, D., Hinze, A., Heese, R., Vanderschantz, N., Timpany, C., Cunningham, S.J.: An exploration of ebook selection behavior in academic library collections. In: Zaphiris, P., Buchanan, G., Rasmussen, E., Loizides, F. (eds.) TPDL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7489, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bogers, T., Rasmussen, R.R., Jensen, L.S.B.: Measuring serendipity in the lab: the effects of priming and monitoring. In: iConference, pp. 703–706 (2013)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gerwe, P., Viles, C.L.: User effort in query construction and interface selection. In: DL 2000. ACM (2000)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    McKay, D., Conyers, B.: Where the streets have no name: how library users get lost in the stacks. In: CHINZ 2010, pp. 77–80. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Marshall, C.C.: Reading and writing the electronic book. In: Marchionini, G. (ed.) Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval and Services. Morgan & Claypool, Chapel Hill (2010)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thudt, A., Hinrichs, U., Carpendale, S.: The Bohemian bookshelf: supporting serendipitous book discoveries through information visualization. In: CHI 2012, pp. 1461–1470. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pariser, E.: The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. Penguin, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kaminskas, M., Bridge, D.: Diversity, serendipity, novelty, and coverage: a survey and empirical analysis of beyond-accuracy objectives in recommender systems. ToIS 7(1), 1–42 (2016)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hill, T., et al.: “Searching for inspiration”: user needs and search architecture in Europeana collections. In: ASIST, pp. 1–7. American Society for Information Science (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephann Makri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yi-Chun Chen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dana McKay
    • 2
  • George Buchanan
    • 2
  • Melissa Ocepek
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for HCI DesignCity, University of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.iSchoolUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  3. 3.iSchoolUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations