Advertisement

Towards an Ontology for Public Procurement Based on the Open Contracting Data Standard

  • Ahmet SoyluEmail author
  • Brian Elvesæter
  • Philip Turk
  • Dumitru Roman
  • Oscar Corcho
  • Elena Simperl
  • George Konstantinidis
  • Till Christopher Lech
Conference paper
  • 1.5k Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11701)

Abstract

The release of a growing amount of open procurement data led to various initiatives for harmonising the data being provided. Among others, the Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) is highly relevant due to its high practical value and increasing traction. OCDS defines a common data model for publishing structured data throughout most of the stages of a contracting process. OCDS is document-oriented and focuses on packaging and delivering relevant data in an iterative and event-driven manner through a series of releases. Ontologies, beyond providing uniform access to heterogeneous procurement data, could enable integration with related data sets such as with supplier data for advanced analytics and insight extraction. Therefore, we developed an ontology, the “OCDS ontology”, by using OCDS’ main domain perspective and vocabulary, since it is an essential source of domain knowledge. In this paper, we provide an overview of the developed ontology.

Keywords

Procurement OCDS Ontology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was partly funded by the EU H2020 projects TheyBuyForYou (780247) and euBusinessGraph (732003).

References

  1. 1.
    Alvarez-Rodríguez, J.M., et al.: New trends on e-Procurement applying semantic technologies: current status and future challenges. Comput. Ind. 65(5), 800–820 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baader, F., et al. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Distinto, I., et al.: LOTED2: an ontology of European public procurement notices. Semant. Web 7(3), 267–293 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giese, M., et al.: Optique: zooming in on big data. IEEE Comput. 48(3), 60–67 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muñoz-Soro, J.F., et al.: PPROC, an ontology for transparency in public procurement. Semant. Web 7(3), 295–309 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Necaský, M., et al.: Linked data support for filing public contracts. Comput. Ind. 65(5), 862–877 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodríguez, J.M.Á., et al.: Towards a Pan-European e-procurement platform to aggregate, publish and search public procurement notices powered by linked open data: the moldeas approach. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 22(3), 365–384 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simperl, E., et al.: Towards a knowledge graph based platform for public procurement. In: Garoufallou, E., Sartori, F., Siatri, R., Zervas, M. (eds.) MTSR 2018. CCIS, vol. 846, pp. 317–323. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14401-2_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soylu, A., et al.: Querying industrial stream-temporal data: an ontology-based visual approach. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 9(1), 77–95 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soylu, A., et al.: Towards integrating public procurement data into a semantic knowledge graph. In: Proceedings of the EKAW 2018 Posters and Demonstrations Session Co-Located with 21st International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2018), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2262, pp. 1–4. ceur-ws.org (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yan, J., et al.: A retrospective of knowledge graphs. Front. Comput. Sci. 12(1), 55–74 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmet Soylu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brian Elvesæter
    • 1
  • Philip Turk
    • 1
  • Dumitru Roman
    • 1
  • Oscar Corcho
    • 2
  • Elena Simperl
    • 3
  • George Konstantinidis
    • 3
  • Till Christopher Lech
    • 1
  1. 1.SINTEF DigitalOsloNorway
  2. 2.Universidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations