Advertisement

Deterrence pp 177-191 | Cite as

Anglo-American Strategic Relations, Economic Warfare and the Deterrence of Japan, 1937–1942: Success or Failure?

  • Greg KennedyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications book series (ASTSA)

Abstract

The study of the use of deterrence as a strategic concept employed by a Great Power, or combination of Powers, has traditionally been associated almost entirely with the Cold War and the use of nuclear weapons within a containment strategy context (Freedman 2004, 2005, pp. 789–801). Therefore, like the concept of containment, deterrence has not been assessed rigorously as a viable strategic tool within the conventional conflict spectrum. Furthermore, the use of empirical historical analysis as the means of providing that assessment has also been absent from considerations regarding the utility of deterrence in the modern international security environment. Finally, deterrence has most often been associated with the threat of the use of military power being the mechanism by which changed or deterred behaviour is achieved (Gaddis 2005; Heuser 1998, pp. 311–328; Tarock 2016, pp. 1408–1424; Milevski 2016). Through an analysis of British and American economic and fiscal policies from 1937 to 1941, aimed at deterring Japan from disrupting the balance of power system in place in the Far East that protected their imperial possessions in the region, a better appreciation of non-military deterrence is achieved (Lacey 2015).

References

  1. Asada S (2006) Between the old diplomacy and the new, 1918–1922: the Washington system and the origins of Japanese-American rapprochement. Dipl Hist 30(2):211–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnhart MA (1987) Japan prepares for total war: the search for economic security, 1919–1941. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett G (2007) Churchill’s man of mystery: Desmond Morton and the world of intelligence. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertsch GK (ed) (1988) Controlling east-west trade and technology transfer: power, politics and policies. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  5. Borg D, Okamoto S (eds) (1973) With the assistance of Dale K. A. Finlayson, Pearl Harbor as history: Japanese-American relations, 1931–1941. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Braisted WR (1971) The United States navy in the Pacific, 1909–1922. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  7. Buhite RD (1969) Nelson T. Johnson and American policy toward China, 1925–1941. Michigan, East LansingGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns JMG (1956) Roosevelt: the lion and the fox. Open Road Integrated Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Clemens J (2013) An analysis of economic warfare. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 103(2):523–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowman I (1996) Dominion or decline: Anglo-American naval relations in the Pacific, 1937–1941. Berg, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford Papers (1938) Private correspondence of 27th Earl Lord Crawford and Balcarres, National Library of Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, letter from Lindsay to Crawford, March 1Google Scholar
  12. Dallek R (1979) Franklin D. Roosevelt and American foreign policy, 1932–1945. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Dingman R (1976) Power in the Pacific: the origins of naval arms limitation. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellings RJ (1985) Embargoes and world power: lessons from American foreign policy. Routledge, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  15. Endicott SL (1975) Diplomacy and enterprise: British China policy, 1933–1937. University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  16. F[oreign] O[ffice], 371/20651/A1925/38/45, [Political Correspondence], The National Archives, Kew, London, telegram from Eden to Lindsay, March 10, 1937Google Scholar
  17. FO 371/20651/A2378/38/45, very confidential despatch from Lindsay to Eden, March 22, 1937Google Scholar
  18. FO 371/21490/A556/1/45, Cadogan minute, February 1, 1938Google Scholar
  19. FO 371/23413/F8029/11/10, departmental memo, July 28, 1939; and /F8103/11/10, minutes, July 28, 1939Google Scholar
  20. FO 371/23414/F10982/11/10, Minute by Pratt on Anglo-American Aid to China, Oct.13, 1939Google Scholar
  21. FO 371/27590/F400/1/10, Confidential Tel. from Rogers to British Embassy in Chungking, January 25, 1941Google Scholar
  22. FO 371/27590/F535/1/10, tel. from Clark Kerr to FO, February 3, 1941Google Scholar
  23. FO 371/27590/F535/1/10, Gage minute February 6th, 1941Google Scholar
  24. FO 371/22095/F9706/62/10, Secret Letter from Mallett to Ronald, August 30, 1938Google Scholar
  25. FO 837 (Ministry of Economic Warfare, Butler Committee, Economic Pressure – Japan)/528, memo from Military Attaché (MA)Washington to Director Military Operations and Intelligence (DMO&I) MI2c, “US-Japan. Probable Effects of US Economic Pressure on Japan.” Oct.19, 1937Google Scholar
  26. FO 837/528, Most Immediate telegram from FO to Washington, October 12, 1937Google Scholar
  27. FO 837/528, memo from Military Attaché Washington to FO, October 19, 1937Google Scholar
  28. FO 837/529, very confidential telegram from Craigie (Ambassador in Tokyo) to FO, January 1, 1939; and telegram from FO to Mallet (Washington), January 23, 1939Google Scholar
  29. FO 837/529, secret memo by Morton, July 14, 1939Google Scholar
  30. FO 837/529, telegram from FO to Craigie, July 25, 1939Google Scholar
  31. FO 837/530, “Notes on the Effect on Japan’s Economic Position in a War with the British Empire, Assuming that the United States of America Exercise full Economic Pressure Against Japan”, July 31, 1940Google Scholar
  32. FO 837/533, “Economic Restrictions Against Japan, paper for Cabinet”, June 28, 1941Google Scholar
  33. FO 837/536, minute by FO, October 9, 1941Google Scholar
  34. Freedman L (2004) Deterrence. Polity, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Freedman L (2005) Deterrence: a reply. J Strateg Stud 28(5):789–801, with associated Round Table articles on deterrence by Patrick M. Morgan and Richard Ned LebowGoogle Scholar
  36. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) Far East 1940, United States Government Printing Offices, Washington, 1943, memorandum of conversation between Shih and Hornbeck, January 6, 1940Google Scholar
  37. FRUS, Far East, 1940, telegram from US Embassy in China (Counselor Peck) to Hull February 5, 1940Google Scholar
  38. FRUS, Far East, 1940, telegram from US Embassy in China Peck to Hull, January 10, 1940Google Scholar
  39. FRUS, Far East, 1941, vol. 2, letter from Secretary of State Hull to Secretary of Treasury Morgenthau, April 24, 1941, pp. 632–33Google Scholar
  40. FRUS, Far East, 1941, vol.2, tel. from Ambassador Nelson T. Johnson to Hull, January 2, 1941, pp. 590–592Google Scholar
  41. Gaddis JL (2005) Strategies of containment: a critical appraisal of American national security policy during the Cold War. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Revised and expanded editionGoogle Scholar
  42. Goldman EO (1994) Sunken treaties. Pennsylvania State University Press, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  43. Goldstein E, Maurer J (eds) (1993) Special issue on the Washington conference, 1921–22: naval rivalry, East Asian stability and the road to Pearl Harbor. Diplomacy & statecraft, 4Google Scholar
  44. Hall C (1987) Britain, America, and arms control. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Haslam J (1992) The Soviet Union and the threat from the East, 1933–41: Moscow, Tokyo, and the prelude to the Pacific War. University of Pittsburgh Press, PittsburghCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heuser B (1998) Victory in a nuclear war? A comparison of NATO and WTO war aims and strategies. Contemp Eur Hist 7(Pt 3):311–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hornbeck SK. Papers, Hoover Institute, Stanford University, Box 459, Chronological Day File, Folder: January 1939, memo by Hornbeck to Welles and Hull, January 25, 1939Google Scholar
  48. Johnson NT. Papers, Library of Congress, Container 66, May 23, 1940 confidential memo from McHugh for NTJ; and Feb.11, 1941, letter NTJ to HornbeckGoogle Scholar
  49. Kennedy G (2007) Intelligence, strategic command and the blockade: Britain’s war winning strategy, 1914-1917. Intell Natl Secur 22(5):699–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kennedy G (2008a) Anglo-American strategic relations and the blockade, 1914-1916. JTS 6(1):22–33Google Scholar
  51. Kennedy G (2008b) Strategy and power: the royal navy, the foreign office and the blockade, 1914–1917. J Defence Stud 8(2):190–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kennedy G (2020) Anglo-American economic warfare and maritime power in the Far East, 1937–1941. In: Owen DM, Hale Louis (eds) Economic warfare and the sea, 1800–1980. Liverpool University Press, pp 36–56Google Scholar
  53. Knopf JW (2012) Varieties of assurance. J Strateg Stud 35(3):375–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kolton RJ (1985) Brandishing the economic weapon: a study of United States economic warfare against Japan, 1941–1941. Master’s thesis, Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, ViginiaGoogle Scholar
  55. Lacey J (2015) Gold, blood, and power: finance and war through the ages. United States War College, Carlisle Barracks Pennsylvania, Strategic Studies Institute, CarlisleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lambert NA (2012) Planning Armageddon: British economic warfare and the first world war. Harvard University Press, HarvardCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McDermott J (1986) Total war and the merchant state: aspects of British economic warfare against Germany, 1914–1916. Can J Hist 21(1):61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McDonald JK (1989) The Washington conference and the naval balance of power, 1921-22. In: Hattendorf JB, Jordan RS (eds) Maritime strategy and the balance of power. Palgrave Macmillan Limited, London, pp 189–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Medlicott WN (1954) Introduction. In: Official history of economic blockade, vol 1. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Meilinger PS (2000) The historiography of airpower: theory and doctrine. J Mil Hist 64(2):4667–4502Google Scholar
  61. Milevski L (2016) The evolution of modern grand strategic thought. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miller ES (1991) War plan orange: the US strategy to defeat Japan, 1897–1945. Naval Institute Press, AnnapolisGoogle Scholar
  63. Murfett MH (1992) Look back in anger: the Western powers and the Washington conference of 1921–1922. In: McKercher BJC (ed) Arms limitation and disarmament. St Martin’s, New York, pp 83–104Google Scholar
  64. Neilson K (2005) ‘Unbroken threat’: Japan, maritime power and British Imperial Defence, 1920-32. In: Kennedy G (ed) British naval strategy East of Suez, 1900–2000: influences and actions. Routledge, London, pp 62–72Google Scholar
  65. Niemeyer, Otto Papers, Bank of England, London, OV9 Otto Niemeyer Papers, OV9/9, China MissionGoogle Scholar
  66. Niemeyer Papers, OV9 Otto Niemeyer Papers, OV9/10: China MissionGoogle Scholar
  67. Niemeyer Papers, OV9/10: China Mission, memo on Chinese situation, James Baxter, November 28, 1941Google Scholar
  68. Nish I (2004) Britain and Japan: long-range images, 1900–52. Dipl Statecraft 15(1):149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nish I (ed) (1982) Anglo-Japanese alienation, 1919–1952. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Nish I (1972) Alliance in decline. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. O’Leary JP (1985) Economic warfare and strategic economics. Comp Strateg 5(2):179–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Park TJ (2011) Guiding public opinion on the Far Eastern crisis, 1931–1941: the American State Department and Propaganda on the Sino-Japanese conflict. Dipl Statecraft 22(3):388–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Petersen K (2016) Four types of power in international relations: coercive power, bargaining power, concerted power and institutionalized power. http://www.docucu-archive.com/view/23ed90acf09132cf4b50b569ffe86cc5/Four-Types-of-Power-in-International-Relations.pdf. Accessed 13 Apr 2018
  74. Ravich S (2018) Cyber-enabled economic warfare: why America’s private sector is on the front lines of an emerging battlefield, September 27. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU2cys7Xyp0&t=55s. Accessed 21 Mar 2018
  75. Rosenman SI (1951) Working with Roosevelt. Hart-Davis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  76. Roskill SW (1968) Naval policy between the wars, vol 1. Collins, London, pp 70–75Google Scholar
  77. Sandilands RJ (1990) The life and political economy of Lauchlin Currie: new dealer, presidential adviser, and development economist. Duke University, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Simpson M (ed) (1991) Anglo-American naval relations, 1917–1919. Naval Record Society Volume, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  79. Stein JG (2013) Threat perception in international relations. In: Huddy L, Sears DO, Levy JS (eds) The Oxford handbook of political psychology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  80. Tarock A (2016) The Iran nuclear deal: winning a little, losing a lot. Third World Q 37(8):1408–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. T[reasury]160/752 F14329-9, The National Archive, Kew, London, immediate telegram from Lindsay to FO, November 16, 1937Google Scholar
  82. T160/752 F14329-11, despatch from Lindsay to Eden, February 8, 1938; despatch from Lindsay to Eden, March 1, 1938Google Scholar
  83. T160/1131, Letter from Cadogan to Leith Ross, Feb.9, 1938 and reply Feb.10, 1938Google Scholar
  84. T 160/1133, F/15194-9, letter from Leith Ross to R.G. Howe, December 7, 1939Google Scholar
  85. T 160/1134, letter from Halifax to Simon, June 31, 1938Google Scholar
  86. T160/1136, F15194-07-11, confidential tel. Craigie to Halifax, March 14, 1939Google Scholar
  87. T160/1136, F15194-07-14, Letter from Phillips to Morgenthau, April 24, 1941Google Scholar
  88. Trotter A (1975) Britain and East Asia, 1933–1937. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. US Naval Academy Conference (2018) The new China challenge: are the US and China destined for war? October 10, 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXyPW8oPO4. Accessed 17 Mar 2018
  90. US Senate Committee Hearing on Global Threats (2019, January 29). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4x7somoUxU. Accessed 11 Apr 2018
  91. Worth RH Jr (2014) No choice but war: the United States against Japan and the eruption of war in the Pacific. McFarland &​ Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations