Advertisement

Deterrence pp 157-176 | Cite as

Linking the Deterrence Concept to Migration

  • Charis AnastasopoulosEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications book series (ASTSA)

Abstract

On 24 January 2017, U.S. president Trump addressed employees at the American Department of Homeland Security. In his speech, he announced that his administration was going to put into action his promise regarding building the wall along the country’s southern border with Mexico. The U.S. president said, “The Secretary of Homeland Security, working with myself and my staff, will begin immediate construction of a border wall. So badly you needed – you folks know how badly needed it is as a help – but very badly needed. This will also help Mexico by deterring illegal immigration from Central America and by disrupting violent cartel networks. As I have said repeatedly to the country, we are going to get the bad ones out – the criminals and the drug dealers and gang members and cartel leaders. The day is over when they can stay in our country and wreak havoc”. The border wall announced by the U.S. president is merely one step in his anti-migration policy. In addition, in his first month in office, the U.S president ordered the extension of the controls by which undocumented migrants might be apprehended more effectively, the enhancement of deportations, and the implementation of a travel ban on citizens of mainly Muslim countries.

References

  1. Anderson B (2006) Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreas P (2009) Border games. Policing the U.S.-Mexico divide. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Arendt H (2000) Über die Revolution. Piper, München/ZürichGoogle Scholar
  4. Arendt H (2006) Elemente und Ursprünge totaler Herrschaft. Antisemitismus, Imperialismus, totale Herrschaft. Piper, München/ZürichGoogle Scholar
  5. Babb S (2007) In the dirty plate trail. Remembering the dust bowl refugee camps. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauman Z (2001) Vom Nutzen der Soziologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  7. Bauman Z (2005) Moderne und Ambivalenz. Das Ende der Eindeutigkeit. Hamburger Edition, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  8. Benz A (2008) Der moderne Staat: Grundlage der politologischen Analyse. Oldenbourg, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourbeau P (2015) Migration, resilience and security: responses to new inflows of asylum seekers and migrants. J Ethn Migr Stud 41(12):1958–1977Google Scholar
  10. Brubaker R (1994) Staats-Bürger. Frankreich und Deutschland im historischen Vergleich. Junius, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  11. Brubaker R (1995) National minorities, nationalizing states, and external national homelands in the new Europe. Daedalus 124(2):107–132Google Scholar
  12. Buzan B, Wæver O, de Wilde J (1998) Security: a new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder/LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Caso M (2011) Invisible and voiceless: the struggle of Mexican Americans for recognition, justice, and equality. iUniverse, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Castles S, de H Haas, Miller MJ (2014) The age of migration. International population movements in the modern world. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Chavez LR (2013) Shadowed lives: undocumented immigrants in American Society. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  16. Cornelius WA (2001) Death at the border: efficacy and unintended consequences of US immigration control policy. Popul Dev Rev 27(4):661–685Google Scholar
  17. Cornelius WA (2005) Controlling ‘unwanted’ immigration: lessons from the United States, 1993-2004. J Ethn Migr Stud 31(4):775–794Google Scholar
  18. de Tocqueville A (1989) Der alte Staat und die Revolution. DTV, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  19. DeLaet DL (2000) U.S. immigration policy in an age of rights. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  20. Dölling D, Entorf H, Hermann D, Rupp T, Woll A (2007) Metaanalyse empirischer Abschreckungsstudien – Untersuchungsansatz und erste empirische Befunde. In: Lösel F, Bender D, Jehle J-M (eds) Kriminologie und wissensbasierte Kriminalpolitik. Entwicklungs- und Evaluationsforschung. Forum Verlag Godesberg, MönchengladbachGoogle Scholar
  21. Dotty RL (2013) Bare life: border-crossing deaths and spaces of moral alibi. In: Dowling JA, Inda JX (eds) Governing immigration through crime: a reader. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Dulles JF (1954) Policies for security and peace. Foreign Aff 32(3):357–359Google Scholar
  23. Dunn TJ (2009) Blockading the border and human rights. The El Paso operation that remade immigration enforcement. University Press of Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar
  24. Durkheim E (1994) On institutional analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Durkheim E (2008) Über soziale Arbeitsteilung. Studie über die Organisation höherer Gesellschaften. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  26. Eisenstadt S (2006) Theorie und Moderne. Soziologische Essays. VS-Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  27. Elias N (1980) Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und phylogenetische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band. Wandlungen der Gesellschaft. Entwurf zu einer Theorie der Zivilisation. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  28. Elias N, Scotson JL (1994) The established and the outsiders. SAGE, London/Thousand Oaks/New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  29. Ermisch H (2000) Minderheitenschutz im Grundgesetz. LIT, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  30. Espenshade TJ (2015) Immigration reform, 1980s-1990s. In: Ciment J, Radzilowski J (eds) American immigration. An encyclopedia of political, social, and cultural change. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Estévez A (2012) Human rights, migration, and social conflict. Towards a decolonized social justice. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Ewing WA (2014) “Enemy territory”: immigration enforcement in the US-Mexico borderlands. J Migr Hum Secur 2(3):198–222Google Scholar
  33. Foucault M (2003) Überwachen und Strafen. Die Geburt des Gefängnisses. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  34. Foucault M (2006) Sicherheit, Territorium, Bevölkerung. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität I. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  35. Freedman L (1983) The evolution of nuclear strategy. The Macmillan Press, London/BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  36. Freilich JD, Opesso MR, Newman GR (2016) Immigration, security and civil liberties post 9/11: a comparison of American, Australian and Canadian legislative and policy changes. In: Freilich JD, Guerette RT (eds) Migration, culture conflict, crime and terrorism. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Freudenberg D (2008) Theorie des Irregulären: Partisanen, Guerillas und Terroristen im modernen Kleinkrieg. VS-Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  38. Gellner E (1983) Nations and nationalism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Gerston LN (2007) American federalism: a concise introduction. Routledge, Abingdon/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Gibbs JP (1986) Deterrence theory and research. In: Melton GB (ed) The law as a behavioural instrument. Nebraska symposium on motivation. Nebraska University Press, NebraskaGoogle Scholar
  41. Gilbert L (2009) Immigration as local politics: re-bordering immigration and multiculturalism through deterrence and incapacitation. Int J Urban Reg Res 33(1):26–42Google Scholar
  42. Golash-Boza TM (2016) Immigration nation. Raids, detentions, and deportations. Routledge, Abingdon/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Habermas J (1998) Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  44. Habermas J (1999) Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  45. Ho CGT, Loucky J (2012) Humane migration. Establishing legitimacy and rights for displaced people. Kumarian Press, SterlingGoogle Scholar
  46. Hobsbawm E (2004) Nations and nationalism since 1780. Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Huysmans J (2000) The European Union and the securitization of migration. J Common Mark Stud 38(5):751–777Google Scholar
  48. Inda JX, Downling JA (2013) Introduction: governing migrant illegality. In: Dowling JA, Inda JX (eds) Governing immigration through crime: a reader. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Jellinek G (1914) Allgemeine Staatslehre. Verlag von O. Häring, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  50. Koslowski R (2011) Global mobility regimes. A conceptual framework. In: Koslowski R (ed) Global mobility regimes. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Koulish R (2010) Immigration and American democracy. Subverting the rule of law. Routledge, New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Koven SG, Götzke F (2010) American immigration policy. Confronting the nation’s challenges. Springer, New York/Dodrecht/Heidelberg/LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Laham N (2000) Ronald Reagan and the politics of immigration reform. Praeger, Westport/LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Lebowitz LM, Podheiser IL (2002) A summary of the changes in immigration policies and practices after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Univ Pittsbg Law Rev 63:873–888Google Scholar
  55. Legomsky SH (2007) New path of immigration law. Asymmetric incorporation of criminal justice norms. Immigr Natl Law Rev 28:679–740Google Scholar
  56. LeMay MC (2007) Illegal migration. A reference handbook. ABC-CLIO, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  57. Lepsius R (1990) Interessen, Ideen und Institutionen. Westdeutscher Verlag, OpladenGoogle Scholar
  58. Martin PL (2014) The United States. The continuing immigration debate. In: Orrenius PM, Martin PL, Hollifield JF (eds) Controlling immigration: a global perspective. Standford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  59. Mindus P (2014) Dimensions of citizenships. Ger Law Rev 15(5):735–750Google Scholar
  60. Morgan PM (1980) Deterrence. A conceptual analysis. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. Morgan PM (2003) Deterrence now. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Myrdal G (2009) An American dilemma. The negro-problem and modern democracy, vol 1. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick/LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Nagin DS (2013) Deterrence in the twenty-first century. Crime Justice 42(2):199–263Google Scholar
  64. Park EJW, Park JSW (2005) Probationary Americans. Contemporary immigration policies and the shaping of Asian American communities. Routledge, New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. Parker KM (2015) Making foreigners. Immigration and citizenship law in America, 1600–2000. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  66. Pates R (2013) Einleitung – Der “Ossi” als symbolischer Ausländer. In: Pates R, Schochow M (eds) Der “Ossi”. Mikropolitische Studien über einen symbolischen Ausländer. Springer, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  67. Popitz H (2004) Phänomene der Macht. J.C.B. Mohr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  68. Potocky-Tripody M (2002) Best practices for social work with refugees and immigrants. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Pries L (2010) Soziologie der Migration. In: Kneer G, Schroer M (eds) Handbuch Spezielle Soziologien. VS-Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  70. Romero F (2008) Hyper-border. The contemporary U.S.-Mexico border and its future. Princeton Architectural Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Rosenblum MR, Cornelius WA (2012) Dimensions of immigration policy. In: Rosenblum MR, Tichenor DJ (eds) The politics of international migration. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  72. Rosenblum MR, Soto AGR (2015) An analysis of unauthorized immigrants in the United States by country and region of birth. Migration Policy Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/analysis-unauthorized-immigrants-united-states-country-and-region-birthGoogle Scholar
  73. Samaha J (2011) Criminal law. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  74. Schelling TC (2008) Arms and influence. Yale University Press, New Haven/LondonGoogle Scholar
  75. Simmel G (2006) Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  76. Snyder GH (1963) Deterrence and power. J Confl Resolut 4(2):163–178Google Scholar
  77. Snyder GH (2015) Deterrence and defence. Toward a theory of national security. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  78. Stone G (2015) The smallest Slavonic nation. The sorbs of Lusatia. Bloomsbury Publishing, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. Stumpf JP (2015) Crimmigration: encountering the Leviathan. In: Pickering S, Ham J (eds) The Routledge handbook on crime and international migration. Routledge, Abingdon/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. U.S. Border Patrol (1994) Border patrol strategic plan 1994 and beyond. U.S. Border Patrol, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  81. Vaughan JM, Hincapié M, Ooi M (2012) Worksite enforcement. In: Gans J, Replogle EM, Tichenor DJ (eds) Debates on U.S. immigration. Sage, Los Angeles/London/New Dehli/Singapore/Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  82. Waltz KN (1990) Nuclear myths and political realities. Am Polit Sci Rev 84(3):731–745Google Scholar
  83. Waltz KN (2003) More may be better. In: Sagan SD, Waltz KN (eds) The spread of nuclear weapons: a debate renewed. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Weber M (1994) Wissenschaft als Beruf. Politik als Beruf. MWS I/17. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  85. Weber M (2001) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Die Wirtschaft und die gesellschaftlichen Ordnungen und Mächte. Nachlaß. Teilband 1: Gemeinschaften. J.C.B. Mohr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  86. Weber M (2009) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Die Wirtschaft und die gesellschaftlichen Ordnungen und Mächte. Nachlaß. Teilband 4: Herrschaft. MWS I/22–4. J.C.B. Mohr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  87. Weber M (2013) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Soziologie. Unvollendet 1919–1920. MWS I/23. J.C.B. Mohr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  88. Zelinsky W (1971) The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geogr Rev 61(2):219–249Google Scholar
  89. Ziegler HO (1931) Die moderne Nation. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  90. Zolberg AR (2008) A nation by design. Immigration policy in the fashioning of America. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations