Management of Franchising Networks: Seven Principles for Fair Franchise Advisory Councils

  • Evelien P. M. CroonenEmail author
  • Ivo Bleeker
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


Franchise Advisory Councils (FACs) form an important managerial instrument for franchisors to create and/or maintain franchisees’ trust in the fair and effective functioning of their franchising networks. We build on procedural fairness theory and insights from articles in trade journals to develop a theoretical framework with seven core principles that affect franchisees’ perceptions regarding the fair management of their FACs. These core principles are the consistency principle, the bias suppression principle, the accuracy principle, the correctability principle, the representativeness principle, the ethicality principle, and the interactional principle. For each core principle, we distinguish specific managerial principles that help in fulfilling it. This discussion results in an extensive framework with principles for the design and management of fair FACs (“the fair FAC framework”). We end the chapter by discussing theoretical implications and avenues for future research.


Franchise Advisory Councils (FACs) Franchise relationship management Procedural fairness Procedural justice Franchisee trust 


  1. Adams JS (1963) Toward an understanding of inequity. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 67:422–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson B (2002) Franchisee advisory councils serve as effective conduits. Franchising World 34(6):9–10Google Scholar
  3. Bies RJ, Moag JF (1986) Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki R, Sheppard BH, Bazerman MH (eds) Research on negotiations in organizations, vol 1, pp 43–55Google Scholar
  4. Bloom BV (2003) Cooperation: the key to building lasting franchise relationships. Franchis World 35(6):27–28Google Scholar
  5. Bobocel DR (2013) Coping with unfair events constructively or destructively: the effects of overall justice and self-other orientation. J Appl Psychol 98(2):720–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brockner J, Wiesenfeld BM (1996) An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychol Bull 120:189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cochet O, Ehrmann T (2007) Preliminary evidence on the appointment of institutional solutions to franchisor moral hazard – the case of franchise councils. Manag Decis Econ 28(1):41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE (2001) The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 86(2):278–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colquitt JA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J Appl Psychol 86(3):386–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ (2001) Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol 86(3):425–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colquitt JA, Zipay KP, Lynch JW, Outlaw R (2018) Bringing “the beholder” center stage: on the propensity to perceive overall fairness. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 148:159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Croonen EPM (2010) Trust and fairness during strategic change processes in franchise systems. J Bus Ethics 95(2):191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Croonen EPM, Broekhuizen TLJ (2019) How do franchisees assess franchisor trustworthiness? J Small Bus Manag 57(3):845–871Google Scholar
  14. Cumberland DM (2012a) Franchise advisory boards and councils: mapping your relationship. Franchising World 44(9):31–33Google Scholar
  15. Cumberland DM (2012b) Part 3: franchise advisory boards and councils: mapping your future. Franchising World 44(12):72–73Google Scholar
  16. Cumberland DM (2015) Advisory councils in franchising: advancing a theory-based typology. J Mark Channels 22:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dandridge TC, Falbe CM (1994) The influence of franchisees beyond their local domains. Int Small Bus J 12(2):39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies MAP, Lassar W, Manolis C, Prince M, Winsor RD (2011) A model of trust and compliance in franchise relationships. J Bus Ventur 26:321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dwyer JM (2008) No franchise is an island: franchisees and franchisors rely on each other. Franchising World 40(7):80–81Google Scholar
  20. Flaherty T (2016) Strategies for working with franchise advisory councils. Franchising World 48(8):35–37Google Scholar
  21. Greenberg J (1990) Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J Manag 16(2):399–432Google Scholar
  22. Greenberg J (1993) The social side of fairness: interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In: Cropanzano R (ed) Justice in the workplace. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Grueneberg S (2004) Creating and maintain effective relations with franchisee advisory councils. Franchis World 36(6):22–23Google Scholar
  24. Hackel E (2011) Getting better results from your franchisee advisory councils. Franchis World 43:22–24Google Scholar
  25. Hackel E (2012) Creating empowerment: enabling franchisees to be heard. Franchising World 44(9):26–27Google Scholar
  26. Kaufmann PJ, Eroglu S (1998) Standardization and adaptation in business format franchising. J Bus Ventur 14(1):69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawrence B, Kaufmann PJ (2010) Franchisee associations: strategic focus or response to franchisor opportunism. J Market Channel 17(2):137–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawrence B, Kaufmann PJ (2011) Identity in franchise systems: the role of franchisee associations. J Retail 87(3):285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leventhal GS (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen KJ, Gereenberg MS, Willis RH (eds) Social exchange: advances in theory and research. Plenum, New York, pp 27–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lind EA, Tyler TR (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Modell CS (2010) Trust: key to successful franchise relationships. Franchis World 42(9):9–10Google Scholar
  32. Perry R (1993) The facts about FAC’s: they work! Franchis World 25(4):12–14Google Scholar
  33. Pfeifer C (2007) The perceived fairness of layoffs in Germany: participation, compensation, or avoidance? J Bus Ethics 74:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Storholm G, Scheuing EE (1994) Ethical implications of business format franchising. J Bus Ethics 13(3):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van Dijke M, de Cremer D, Langendijk G, Anderson C (2018) Ranking low, feeling high: how hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behaviour in response to procedural justice. J Appl Psychol 103(2):164–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wulff E (2005) Advisory councils: effective two-way communications for franchise systems (revised version of 2005). International Franchise Association, Washington, DC. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics & BusinessUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Flynth Adviseurs & Accountants ZwolleZwolleThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations