Advertisement

Strategic CSR and the Competitive Advantage of Franchise Firms

  • Maria Jell-OjoborEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a widely researched topic, there is a lack of its application in the franchise literature. The integration of CSR into the franchise business model is vital as it affects the franchise firm’s growth and survival. Based on resource-based and organizational capabilities theories, our study explains how CSR strategy impacts the creation of intangible brand name assets as critical source of sustainable competitive advantage and, hence, increased financial performance. We adopt a multi-stakeholder-oriented CSR construct of economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibility dimensions. Using data from Austrian franchise firms, our results show that those CSR dimensions have a positive impact on brand name asset creation. Specifically, philanthropic responsibility strategy has the greatest impact on brand name assets, followed by legal, ethical, and economic responsibility strategies. Overall, this is the first study in franchising which explains the strategic role of CSR.

Keywords

Multidimensional CSR Corporate strategy Franchising Intangible assets Competitive advantage 

References

  1. Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):836–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail survey. Avenues to greater theoretical diversity. J Manag 30(6):907–931Google Scholar
  3. Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strateg Manag J 26(3):197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):794–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120Google Scholar
  6. Barthélemy J (2008) Opportunism knowledge and the performance of franchise chains. Strateg Manag J 29(13):1451–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berman SL, Wicks AC, Kotha S, Jones TM (1999) Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad Manag J 42(5):488–506Google Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya CB, Korschun D, Sen S (2009) Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. J Bus Ethics 85(2):257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brammer SJ, Pavelin S (2006) Corporate reputation and social performance: the importance of fit. J Manag Stud 43(3):435–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Branco MC, Rodrigues LL (2006) Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. J Bus Ethics 69(2):111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown TJ, Dacin PA (1997) The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J Mark 61(1):68–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burton F, Cross AR, Rhodes M (2000) Foreign market servicing strategies of UK franchisors: an empirical enquiry from a transactions cost perspective. Manag Int Rev 40(4):373–400Google Scholar
  13. Carroll AB (1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Manag Rev 4(4):497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz 34(4):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll AB, Shabana KM (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts research and practice. Int J Manag Rev 12(1):85–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castrogiovanni GJ, Combs JG, Justis RT (2006) Resource scarcity and agency theory predictions concerning the continued use of franchising in multi-outlet networks. J Small Bus Manag 44(1):27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chakravarthy BS (1986) Measuring strategic performance. Strateg Manag J 7(5):437–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Choo S (2005) Determinants of monitoring capabilities in international franchising: foodservice firms within East Asia. Asia Pac J Manag 22(2):159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Christmann P (2000) Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Acad Manag J 43(4):663–680Google Scholar
  20. Clarkson ME (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):92–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP (2008) Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis. Acc Org Soc 33(4-5):303–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Combs JG, Ketchen DJ Jr (1999) Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strateg Manag J 20(9):867–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Combs JG, Ketchen DJ Jr, Shook CL, Short JC (2011) Antecedents and consequences of franchising: past accomplishments and future challenges. J Manag 37(1):99–126Google Scholar
  24. Conner KR (1991) A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm? J Manag 17(1):121–154Google Scholar
  25. Contractor FJ, Kundu SK (1998a) Franchising versus company-run operations: modal choice in the global hotel sector. J Int Mark 6(2):28–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Contractor FJ, Kundu SK (1998b) Modal choice in a world of alliances: analysing organisational forms in the international hotel sector. J Int Bus Stud 29(2):325–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cordeiro JJ, Sarkis J (1997) Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Bus Strateg Environ 6(2):104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Croonen E (2010) Trust and fairness during strategic change processes in franchise systems. J Bus Ethics 95(2):191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dant RP, Grünhagen M, Kaufmann PJ, Brown JR, Cliquet G, Robicheaux RA (2012) Chronicling the saga of 25 years of International Society of Franchising. J Small Bus Manag 50(4):525–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Darnall N, Henriques I, Sadorsky P (2008) Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? J Int Manag 14(4):364–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. De la Cruz D-DM, De Saá-Pérez P (2003) A resource-based view of corporate responsiveness toward employees. Organ Stud 24(2):299–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Delmas MA, Toffel MW (2008) Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box. Strateg Manag J 29(10):1027–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts evidence and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dunning JH, Pak YS, Beldona S (2007) Foreign ownership strategies of UK and US international franchisors: an exploratory application of Dunning’s envelope paradigm. Int Bus Rev 16(5):531–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Elango B (2007) Are franchisors with international operations different from those who are domestic market oriented? J Small Bus Manag 54(2):179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Erramilli KM, Agarwal S, Dev CS (2002) Choice between non-equity entry modes: an organisational capability perspective. J Int Bus Stud 33(2):223–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fladmoe-Lindquist K, Jacque LL (1995) Control modes in international service operations: the propensity to franchise. Manag Sci 41(7):1238–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fombrun CJ, Gardberg NA, Barnett ML (2000) Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Bus Soc Rev 105(1):85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J Mark Res 18:382–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Foss NJ (1993) Theories of the firm: contractual and competence perspectives. J Evol Econ 3(2):127–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Freeman RE, Reed DL (1983) Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective in corporate governance. Calif Manag Rev 25(3):88–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Frooman J (1999) Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad Manag Rev 24(2):191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gámez-González J, Rondan-Cataluña FJ, Diez-de Castro EC, Navarro-Garcia A (2010) Toward an international code of franchising. Manag Decis 48(10):1568–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Greening DW, Gray B (1994) Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Acad Manag J 37(3):467–498Google Scholar
  46. Griffin JJ, Mahon JF (1997) The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus Soc 36(1):5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hill CW, Jones TM (1992) Stakeholder-agency theory. J Manag Stud 29(2):131–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value stakeholder management and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strateg Manag J 22(2):125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hillman AJ, Keim GD, Schuler D (2004) Corporate political activity: a review and research agenda. J Manag 30(6):837–857Google Scholar
  50. Hult GTM (2011) Market-focused sustainability: market orientation plus! J Acad Mark Sci 39(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Husted BW, de Jesus SJ (2006) Taking Friedman seriously: maximizing profits and social performance. J Manag Stud 43(1):75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Husted BW, Allen DB, Kock N (2012) Value creation through social strategy. Bus Soc 54(2):147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Huszagh SM, Huszagh FW, McIntyre FS (1992) International franchising in the context of competitive strategy and the theory of the firm. Int Mark Rev 9(5).  https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339210020268
  54. Jeon HJ, Gleiberman A (2017) Examining the role of sustainability and green strategies in channels: evidence from the franchise industry. J Mark Theory Pract 25(2):189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jones TM (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad Manag Rev 20(2):404–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Julian SD, Castrogiovanni GJ (1995) Franchisor geographic expansion. J Small Bus Manag 33(2):1Google Scholar
  57. Kedia BL, Ackerman DJ, Bush DE, Justice RT (1994) Study note: determinants of internationalization of franchise operations by US franchisors. Int Mark Rev 11(4):56–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kim JS, Song H, Lee CK, Lee JY (2017) The impact of four CSR dimensions on a gaming company’s image and customers’ revisit intentions. Int J Hosp Manag 61:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lacey R, Kennett-Hensel PA (2010) Longitudinal effects of corporate social responsibility on customer relationships. J Bus Ethics 97(4):581–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lee YK, Lee KH, Li DX (2012) The impact of CSR on relationship quality and relationship outcomes: a perspective of service employees. Int J Hosp Manag 31(3):745–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lee YK, Kim SH, Banks HSC, Lee KH (2014) An ethical work climate and its consequences among food-service franchise employees. Asia Pac J Tour Res 20(11):1286–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Madhok A (1996) Crossroads-the organization of economic activity: transaction costs firm capabilities and the nature of governance. Organ Sci 7(5):577–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Marcus A, Geffen D (1998) The dialectics of competency acquisition: pollution prevention in electric generation. Strateg Manag J 19(12):1145–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Adm Sci Q 48(2):268–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):925–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26(1):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McWilliams A, Siegel DS (2011) Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility resource-based theory and sustainable competitive advantage. J Manag 37(5):1480–1495Google Scholar
  68. McWilliams A, Van Fleet DD, Cory KD (2002) Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: an extension of resource-based theory. J Manag Stud 39(5):707–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McWilliams A, Siegel DS, Wright PM (2006) Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J Manag Stud 43(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Meiseberg B, Ehrmann T (2012) Lost in translation? The prevalence and performance impact of corporate social responsibility in franchising. J Small Bus Manag 50(4):566–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83(2):340–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nelling E, Webb E (2009) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the ‘virtuous circle’ revisited. Rev Quant Finan Acc 32(2):197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic behavior and capabilities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 195–307Google Scholar
  75. Nygaard A, Biong H (2010) The influence of retail management’s use of social power on corporate ethical values employee commitment and performance. J Bus Ethics 97(1):87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad Manag Rev 16(1):145–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24(3):403–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pak YS (2002) The effect of strategic motives on the choice of entry modes: an empirical test of international franchisers. Multinatl Bus Rev 10(1):28Google Scholar
  79. Peloza J, Shang J (2011) How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. J Acad Mark Sci 39(1):117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Perrigot R, Oxibar B, Déjean F (2013) Corporate social disclosure in the franchising sector: insights from French franchisors’ websites. J Small Bus Manag 53(2):321–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pfeffer JS, Salancik G (1978) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  82. Pizanti I, Lerner M (2003) Examining control and autonomy in the franchisor-franchisee relationship. Int Small Bus J 21(2):131–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Porter ME, Kramer MR (2002) The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harv Bus Rev 80(12):56–68Google Scholar
  85. Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84:78–92Google Scholar
  86. Preble JF, Hoffman RC (1999) The nature of ethics codes in franchise associations around the globe. J Bus Ethics 18(3):239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Preble JF, Reichel A, Hoffman RC (2000) Strategic alliances for competitive advantage: evidence from Israel’s hospitality and tourism industry. Int J Hosp Manag 19(3):327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Quinn B, Doherty AM (2000) Power and control in international retail franchising - evidence from theory and practice. Int Mark Rev 17(4/5):354–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rhou Y, Singal M, Koh Y (2016) CSR and financial performance: the role of CSR awareness in the restaurant industry. Int J Hosp Manag 57:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Roberts PW, Dowling GR (2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strateg Manag J 23(12):1077–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rowley TJ (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):887–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rowley T, Berman S (2000) A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Bus Soc 39(4):397–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rowley TI, Moldoveanu M (2003) When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Acad Manag Rev 28(2):204–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ruf BM, Muralidhar K, Brown RM, Janney JJ, Paul K (2001) An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: a stakeholder theory perspective. J Bus Ethics 32(2):143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rumelt RP (1984) Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Compet Strategic Manag 26:556–570Google Scholar
  96. Russo MV (1992) Power plays: regulation diversification and backward integration in the electric utility industry. Strateg Manag J 13(1):13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: the role of customer awareness. Manag Sci 59(5):1045–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg Manag J 19(8):729–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sirsly CAT, Lamertz K (2007) When does a corporate social responsibility initiative provide a first-mover advantage? Bus Soc 47(3):343–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Storholm G, Scheuing EE (1994) Ethical implications of business format franchising. J Bus Ethics 13(3):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Surroca J, Tribó JA, Waddock S (2010) Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strateg Manag J 31(5):463–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Turban DB, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad Manag J 40(3):658–672Google Scholar
  103. Ullmann AA (1985) Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance social disclosure and economic performance of US firms. Acad Manag Rev 10(3):540–557Google Scholar
  104. Vallentin S, Murillo D (2012) Governmentality and the politics of CSR. Organization 19(6):825–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Van Marrewijk M (2003) Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. J Bus Ethics 44(2-3):95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Werther WB, Chandler D (2005) Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Bus Horiz 48(4):317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wood DJ (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manag Rev 16(4):691–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wood DJ, Jones RE (1995) Stakeholder mismatching: a theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. Int J Org Anal 3(3):229–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Youn H, Song S, Lee S, Kim JH (2016) Does the restaurant type matter for investment in corporate social responsibility? Int J Hosp Manag 58:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and ManagementLUISS Guido Carli UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations