Dynamic Investigation and Short-Monitoring of an Historic Multi-span Masonry Arch Bridge

  • Andrea BenedettiEmail author
  • Mirco Tarozzi
  • Giacomo Pignagnoli
  • Claudia Martinelli
Conference paper
Part of the Structural Integrity book series (STIN, volume 11)


A number of vibration-based Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) algorithms have been developed in the last two decades with the purpose of extracting reliable structural features from recorded dynamic signals. By using a mix of techniques the identified frequencies gain a statistical evidence, as in the procedure used in the validation of the Pontelungo bridge natural frequency set. The Pontelungo Bridge is an historic masonry bridge crossing the Reno River, firstly built in the medieval age and updated several times in its life, resulting so in a very complex geometry and behaviour. A numerical model able to reproduce the experimental frequencies has been obtained through a suitable calibration procedure, based on several iteration steps and FE models of different complexity. The updated model can then be used in checking hypotheses of potential damage scenarios that can emerge as frequency shifts in the bridge monitoring phase. However, in order to have a sound set of frequency values, a long-term monitoring period is needed. This activity has started recently but with consistent results that validate the worked out model.


Masonry arch bridge Dynamic testing Structural identification Model updating 


  1. 1.
    Reynders, E., Houbrechts, J., De Roeck, G.: Fully automated (operational) modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 29, 228–250 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cabboi, A., Gentile, C., Saisi, A.: Vibration-based SHM of a centenary bridge: a comparative study between two different automated OMA techniques. In: EURODYN 2014, Porto (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brencich, A., Sabia, D.: Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge the Tanaro bridge. Constr. Build. Mater. 22, 2087–2090 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pelà, L., Aprile, A., Benedetti, A.: Comparison of seismic assessment procedures for masonry arch bridges. Constr. Build. Mater. 38, 381–394 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ENSER s.r.l.: Historical document collection, Technical report and drawings, Bologna (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marastoni, D., Benedetti, A., Pelà, L., Pignagnoli, G.: Torque Penetrometric Test for the in-situ characterisation of historical mortars: fracture mechanics interpretation and experimental validation. Constr. Build. Mater. 157, 509–520 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brincker, R., Zhang, L., Andersen, P.: Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition. Smart Mater. Struct. 10(3), 441–445 (2001). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tomor, A., Nichols, J., Benedetti, A.: Identifying the condition of masonry arch bridges using cx1 accelerometer. In: ARCH 2016, Wroklaw (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials EngineeringUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations