Advertisement

Stereotypes and the Education of In-Service Mathematics Teachers in Urban Schools

  • Luz Valoyes-ChávezEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Research in Mathematics Education book series (RME)

Abstract

Research has shown that reform-based instruction focused on solving nonroutine mathematics problems positively impacts low-income students’ learning opportunities, participation, and identities. Working in groups, discussing mathematical ideas, and engaging in rich whole-class mathematical conversations seem to promote interactions that challenge the invisible role usually played by this student population within mathematics classrooms. Nevertheless, learning to implement this type of mathematics teaching in urban school settings is a difficult endeavor for teachers. In these contexts, teachers’ practices are strongly mediated by the social representations of their students that materialize in low expectations. In this paper, I explore a high school mathematics teacher’s learning process to enhance the participation of his students while solving nonroutine problems. Using the notion of reflective practice, the teacher had the opportunity to critically think about his own learning experiences. The results evidence the complexity involved in implementing reform-based mathematics instruction in urban school settings and the critical role played by deeply rooted stereotypical representations in his process of learning and opportunities to change his teaching.

Keywords

Problem solving In-service mathematics teacher education Urban schools Stereotypes Representation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Funding from Fondecyt Conicyt #3180238 and PIA-CONICYT Funds for Centers of Excellence #FB0003 is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Balfanz, R., Mac Iver, D., & Byrnes, V. (2006). The implementation and impact of evidence-based mathematics reforms in high-poverty middle schools: A multi-site, multi-year study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(1), 33–64.Google Scholar
  2. Bartell, T. G. (2013). Learning to teach mathematics for social justice: Negotiating social justice and mathematical goals. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 129–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battey, D. (2013). “Good” mathematics teaching for students of color and those in poverty: The importance of relational interactions within instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(x), 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–599.Google Scholar
  5. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). Racial attitudes or racial ideology? An alternative paradigm for examining actors’ racial views. Journal of Political Ideologies, 8(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bower, H. A., & Carlton, E. (2016). Teacher identity and reform: Intersections within school culture. Urban Review, 48, 743–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chahine, I., & Clarkson, L. M. (2010). Collaborative evaluative inquiry: A model for improving mathematics instruction in urban elementary schools. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(1), 82–97.Google Scholar
  8. Darragh, L., & Radovic, D. (2019). “To tia with love”: Chilean teacher identities after professional development. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 517–527.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01023-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diamond, J., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(1), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felmer, P., & Perdomo-Díaz, J. (2017). Un programa de desarrollo profesional docente para un currículo de matemáticas centrado en las habilidades: La resolución de problemas como eje articulador. Educación Matemática, 29(10), 201–2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foote, M. Q. (2009). Stepping out of the classroom: Building teacher knowledge for developing classroom practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(3), 39–53.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, P. (1996). The pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  13. Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogía de la autonomía. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Paz y Tierra.Google Scholar
  14. Gonzalez, L. (2009). Teaching mathematics for Social Justice: Reflections on a community of practie for urban high school mathematics teachers. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 2(1), 22–51.Google Scholar
  15. Gutiérrez, R. (2013). Why (urban) mathematics teachers need political knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(2), 7–19.Google Scholar
  16. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gutstein, E., Fey, J., Heid, M. K., DeLoach-Johnson, I., Middleton, J., Laaron, M., et al. (2005). Equity in school mathematics education: How can research contribute? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 92–100.Google Scholar
  18. Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. The Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290–294.Google Scholar
  19. Hall, S. (1997a). The work of representation. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation. Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 13–74). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, S. (1997b). The spectacle of the “other”. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation. Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 223–290). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Hoadley, U. (2007). The reproduction of social class inequalities through mathematics pedagogies in south African primarily schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(6), 679–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ladson-Billings, G. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A critical race theory perspective. Review of Research in Education, 24, 211–247.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, V., Smith, J., & Croninger, R. (1997). How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 128–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lemons-Smith, S. (2013). Tapping into the intellectual capital of black children in mathematics. Examining the practices of pre-service elementary teachers. In J. Leonard & D. Martin (Eds.), The brilliance of black children in mathematics. Beyond the numbers and toward new discourse (pp. 323–339). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Leonard, J. (2008). Culturally specific pedagogy in the mathematics classroom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Leonardo, Z. (2003). Ideology, discourse, and school reform. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Leonardo, Z., & Hunter, M. (2007). Imagining the urban: The politics of race, class, and schooling. In W. T. Pink & G. Noblit (Eds.), International handbook of urban education (pp. 779–802). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teacher College Record, 111(2), 295–338.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, D. B., & Larnell, G. V. (2014). Urban mathematics education. In H. R. Milner & K. Lomotey (Eds.), Handbook of Urban Education (pp. 373–393). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. McKinney, S., Chappell, S., Berry, R., & Hickman, B. (2009). An examination of the instructional practices of mathematics teachers in urban schools. Preventing School Failure, 53(4), 278–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Planas, N., & Civil, M. (2009). Working with mathematics teachers and immigrant students: An empowerment perspective. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raczynski, D., & Muñoz-Stuardo, g. (2007). Chilean educational reform: The intricate balance between a macro and micro policy. In W. Pink & G. Noblit (Eds.), International Handbook of Urban Education (Vol. II, pp. 641–664). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rubel, L., & Chu, H. (2012). Reinscribing urban: Teaching high school mathematics in low income, urban communities of color. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Senado, República de Chile. (2012). Retrato de la desigualdad en Chile. Santiago de Chile: COMUN & K Producciones Ltda.Google Scholar
  35. Sleeter, C. (1997). Mathematics, multicultural education, and professional development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 680–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, M., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  37. Straehler-Pohl, H., Fernandez, S., Gellert, U., & Figueiras, L. (2013). School mathematics registers in a context of low academic expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Valenzuela, J. P., Bellei, C., & Allende, C. (2016). Measuring systematic long-term trajectories of school effectiveness improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(4), 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Valero, P., & García, G. (2014). El currículo de las matemáticas escoalres y el gobierno del sujeto moderno. Bolema, 28(49), 491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Valoyes-Chávez, L. (2017). Inequidades raciales y educación matemática. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 38(73), 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valoyes-Chávez, L. (2018). Racism and mathematics education in a racial democracy: views from the classroom. In U. Gellert, C. Knipping, & H. Straehler-Pohl (Eds.), Inside the mathematics class. Sociological perspectives on participation, inclusion, and enhancement (pp. 167–189). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Valoyes-Chávez, L. (2019). On the making of a new mathematics teacher: Professional development, subjectivation, and resistance to change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100(2), 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wager, A., & Foote, M. Q. (2013). Locating praxis for equity in mathematics: Lessons from and for professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walshaw, M. (2011). Positive possibilities of rethinking (urban) mathematics education within a postmodern frame. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 4(2), 7–14.Google Scholar
  45. Zevenbergen, R. (2010). Mathematics, social class, and linguistic capital: An analysis of mathematics classroom interactions. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 201–215). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Advanced Research in Education, University of ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations