Advertisement

Chaos, Control, and Need: Success and Sustainability of Professional Development in Problem Solving

  • Lisa Darragh
  • Darinka Radovic
Chapter
Part of the Research in Mathematics Education book series (RME)

Abstract

Many professional development (PD) programmes aim for teachers to incorporate more problem solving in their mathematics teaching, but research aimed at understanding how teachers maintain this change is comparatively less developed. We present here some results of research into the experiences of teachers in the 18 months after their completion of PD in teaching collaborative, non-routine problem solving. Fifteen teachers who completed the course in 2015 volunteered to participate in research that involved responding to a series of reflective emails throughout 2016, a semi-structured interview in 2017, and two classroom observations. In particular, we will present the case of one teacher who initially demonstrated very good application of the problem-solving activity and overcame many of the contextual constraints articulated by other teachers. During the first year after the PD, she performed a ‘professional-learner’ identity; she was willing to improve her practice and manifested commitment to the incorporation of problem-solving activities for this purpose. However, in a subsequent observation, her teaching was dramatically different, showing tight control of students’ actions and timing of activities in the classroom. When reflecting about these changes, again she performed a professional identity, but worked out this professionalisation through an alternative programme of PD. We will discuss the contrasts and conflicts between chaos and control in the teaching of problem solving and the role that teachers’ and institutional needs and purposes play in PD.

Keywords

Professional development Teacher identity Collaborative problem-solving mathematics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the following funding sources: CONICYT Proyectos Fondecyt Post-doctorado #3160469 and #3180291, PIA-CONICYT Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence Project FB0003 (CIAE) and AFB170001 (CMM), and Unité Mixte Internationale (UMI) CNRS 2807.

References

  1. Araya, R., & Dartnell, P. (2008). Video study of mathematics teaching in Chile. 11th international conference on Mathematics Education. Monterrey, Mexico. Retrieved from http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/ICMI/files/About_ICMI/Publications_about_ICMI/ICME_11/Araya_Dartnell.pdf
  2. Avalos, B. (1998). School-based teacher development. The experience of teacher professional groups in secondary schools in Chile. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(3), 257–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00040-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avalos, B., & Aylwin, P. (2007). How young teachers experience their professional work in Chile. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 515–528.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avalos, B., & de Los Rios, D. (2013). Reform environment and teacher identity in Chile. In D. B. Napier & S. Majhanovich (Eds.), Education, dominance and identity (pp. 153–175). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Battey, D., & Franke, M. L. (2008). Transforming identities: Understanding teachers across professional development and classroom practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 127–149. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478985Google Scholar
  6. Boaler, J., & Greeno, G. J. (2000). Identity, agency and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport, CT/London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. Camic, D. Long, A. Panter, D. Rindskopf, K. Sher, & J. Kenneth (Eds.), APA Handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.  https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavanagh, M. (2006). Mathematics teachers and working mathematically: Responses to curriculum change. In Identities, cultures and learning spaces: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 115–122).Google Scholar
  9. Cerda, G., Pérez, C., Giaconi, V., Perdomo-Díaz, J., Reyes, C., & Felmer, P. (2017). The effect of a professional development programme workshop about problem solving on mathematics teachers’ ideas about the nature of mathematics, achievements in mathematics, and learning in mathematics. Psychology, Society, & Education, 9(1), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287–311. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1002273%0DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darragh, L. (2019). Interrogating deficit views: Students and teachers of mathematics in reform contexts. Paper presented at Mathematics Education and Society Conference, MES10. Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
  13. Darragh, L., & Radovic, D. (2018). Mathematics learner identity. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Darragh, L., & Valoyes-Chávez, L. (2019). Blurred lines: Producing the mathematics student through discourses of special educational needs in the context of reform mathematics in Chile. Educational Studies in Mathematics, (online fi). Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-18-9875-7
  15. Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Espinoza, C.-G., Darragh, L., & Peri, A. (2016). Oportunidades para mejorar la calidad de las clases en matematicas. [Opportunities to improve the quality of mathematics classes]. In S. Estrella, M. Goizueta, C. Guerrero, A. Mena, J. Mena, E. Montoya, A. Morales, M. Parranguez, E. Ramos, et al. (Eds.), XX jornadas nacionales de educación matemática (pp. 359–363). Valparaiso, Chile: SOCHIEM, IMA-PUCV.Google Scholar
  17. Felmer, P., Lewin, R., Martínez, S., Reyes, C., Varas, L., Chandía, E., et al. (2014). Primary mathematics standards for pre-service teachers in Chile. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.  https://doi.org/10.1142/8948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Felmer, P., & Perdomo-Díaz, J. (2017). Un programa de desarrollo profesional docente para un currículo de matemática centrado en las habilidades: La resolución de problems como eje articulador. [A program of teacher professional development for the mathematics curriculum centered in the processes]. Revista Educación Matemática, 29(1), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Felmer, P., Perdomo-Díaz, J., Cisternas, T., Randolph, V., & Cea, F. (2013). Prácticas pedagógicas de profesores noveles en relación con la resolución de problemas [Teaching practices of new teachers in relation to problem solving]. XVII Sochiem. Chillán, Chile.Google Scholar
  20. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gellert, U., Espinoza, L., & Barbé, J. (2013). Being a mathematics teacher in times of reform. ZDM, 45(4), 535–545.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0499-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graven, M. (2012). Changing the story: Teacher education through re-authoring their narratives. In C. Day (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of teacher and school development (pp. 127–138). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Gresalfi, M., & Cobb, P. (2011). Negotiating identities for mathematics teaching in the context of professional development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 270–304. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.3.0270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391.  https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Shabtay, G. (2018). Narratives of “good” instruction: Teachers’ identities as drawing on exploration vs. acquisition pedagogical discourses. ZDM – International Journal on Mathematics Education, (online fi). Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01019-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodgen, J., & Johnson, D. C. (2004). Teacher reflection, identity and belief change in the context of primary CAME. In Primary mathematics and the developing professional (pp. 219–244). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Borko, H. (2011). Mathematics professional development: Critical features for developing leadership skills and building teachers’ capacity. Mathematics Teacher Education & Development, 13(1), 115–136. Retrieved from https://www.merga.net.au/ojs/index.php/mted/article/view/49/151Google Scholar
  28. Liljedahl, P. (2010). Noticing rapid and profound mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education., 13, 411.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9151-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liljedahl, P. (2014). Approaching professional learning: What teachers want. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(1), 109–122.Google Scholar
  30. Maaβ, K., & Artigue, M. (2013). Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: A synthesis. ZDM, 45, 779–795.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-05280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ponte, J. P., Matos, J. F., Guimaraes, H. M., Leal, L. C., & Canavarro, A. P. (1994). Teachers’ students’ views and attitudes towards a new mathematics curriculum: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Preiss, D. D. (2010). Folk pedagogy and cultural markers in teaching: Three illustrations from Chile. In D. D. Preiss & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (pp. 325–355). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Sztajn, P., Borko, H., & Smith, T. (2017). Research on mathematics professional development. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 213–243). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  34. Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., & Levenson, E. (2015). Fundamental issues concerning the sustainment and scaling up of professional development programs. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 153–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0665-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Valenzuela, J. P., Bellei, C., & de los Ríos, D. (2014). Socioeconomic school segregation in a market oriented educational system. The case of Chile. Journal of Education Policy, 29(2), 217–241.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.806995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whitcomb, J., Borko, H., & Liston, D. (2009). Growing talent: Promising professional development models and practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 207–212.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109337280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zehetmeier. (2015). Sustaining and scaling up the impact of professional development programmes. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 117–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0671-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Darragh
    • 1
  • Darinka Radovic
    • 2
  1. 1.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Universidad de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations