Benefits from Engineering Projects Implementation

  • Oleg Kuzmin
  • Volodymyr ZhezhukhaEmail author
  • Nataliia Gorodyska
  • Eleonora Benova
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1035)


The key methods for establishing the enterprises outcome from engineering projects implementation, which are the most widespread ones within the international engineering activities, have been determined and characterized. The main types of costs that business entity may incur in relation to the engineering project realization have been highlighted. Based on examining the most common concepts of managerial decision-making at risk (as it is under those circumstances that managers of industrial enterprises make decisions on engineering services cost), it was proposed to use the game theory instruments for establishing the structure of engineering payments during the engineering services delivery.


  1. 1.
    Kryvinska, N.: Building consistent formal specification for the service enterprise agility foundation. J. Serv. Sci. Res. 4(2), 235–269 (2012). The Society of Service ScienceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaczor, S., Kryvinska, N.: It is all about services - fundamentals, drivers, and business models. J. Serv. Sci. Res. 5(2), 125–154 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wong, K.: The role of risk in making decisions under escalation situations. Appl. Psychol. 54(4), 584–607 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herrmann, J.: Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management. Wiley, Hoboken (2015)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beroggi, G., Wallace, W.A.: Operational Risk Management: The Integration of Decision, Communications, and Multimedia Technologies. Kluwer Academic, Boston (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chapman, R.: Institute of risk management. In: Simple Tools and Techniques for Enterprise Risk Management, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moran, T., West, G.T.: Multilateral investment guarantee agency. In: MIGA-Georgetown University Symposium on International Political Risk Management, (International political risk management; 3). World Bank, Washington, D.C. (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bauso, D.: Game Theory with Engineering Applications. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Binmore, K.G.: Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DeVos, M.J., Kent, D.A.: Game Theory: A Playful Introduction. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kryvinska, N., Gregus, M.: SOA and its business value in requirements, features, practices and methodologies. Comenius University in Bratislava (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molnár, E., Molnár, R., Kryvinska, N., Greguš, M.: Web intelligence in practice. J. Serv. Sci. Res. 6(1), 149–172 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chander, P.: Game Theory and Climate Change. Columbia University Press, New York (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Friedman, D.: On economic applications of evolutionary game theory. J. Evol. Econ. 8(1), 15–43 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oleg Kuzmin
    • 1
  • Volodymyr Zhezhukha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nataliia Gorodyska
    • 1
  • Eleonora Benova
    • 2
  1. 1.Lviv Polytechnic National UniversityLvivUkraine
  2. 2.Faculty of ManagementComenius University in BratislavaBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations