Advertisement

Position Follow-up Control for Hand Delivery of Object Between Moving Robot Arms of Remote Robot Systems with Force Feedback

  • Qin Qian
  • Yutaka IshibashiEmail author
  • Pingguo Huang
  • Yuichiro Tateiwa
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1036)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose position follow-up control for dealing with hand delivery of an object between moving robot arms of remote robot systems with force feedback, and we investigate the effect of the control by experiment. We also examine influences of the network delay on the hand delivery of the object under the control. In each system, a user can operate the moving robot arm having a force sensor by using a haptic interface device while watching video. An electric hand which can hold the object is attached to the tip of the robot arm. In the position follow-up control, the position of one robot arm is automatically moved close to the other moving robot arm, and then smooth hand delivery is realized in combination with manual operation. In the experiment, we make a comparison between the case in which the position follow-up control is carried out and the case in which the control is not performed. Experimental results show that the average operation time is greatly decreased under the control, and the average operation time increases as the network delay becomes larger.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors thanks Yuichi Toyoda for his support to construct the experiment system. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 18K11261.

References

  1. 1.
    Ohnishi, K.: Real world haptics: its principle and future prospects. IEEJ 133(5), 268–269 (2013). (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kawai, T.: Haptics for surgery. IEEJ 133(5), 282–285 (2013). (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miyoshi, T., Terashima, K.: A stabilizing method for non-passive force-position teleoperating system. In: SICE Symposium on Control Theory, vol. 35, pp. 127–130 (2006). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miyoshi, T., Maeda, Y., Morita, Y., Ishibashi, Y., Terashima, K.: Development of haptic network game based on multi-lateral tele-control theory and influence of network delay on QoE. Trans. Virtual Real. Soc. Jpn. Spec. Issues Haptic Contents 19(4), 559–569 (2014). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ishibashi, Y., Huang, P.: Improvement of QoS in haptic communication and its future. IEICE Trans. Commun. (Jpn. Ed.) J99-B(10), 911–925 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang, P., Miyoshi, T., Ishibashi, Y.: Stabilization of bilateral control in remote robot system. IEICE Technical report, CQ2016-125, March 2017. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang, P., Toyoda, Y., Taguchi, E., Miyoshi, T., Ishibashi, Y.: Improvement of haptic quality in stabilization control of remote robot system. IEICE Technical report CQ2017-79, November 2017. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arima, R., Huang, P., Ishibashi, Y., Tateiwa, Y.: Softness assessment of objects in remote robot system with haptics: comparison between reaction force control upon hitting and stabilization control. IEICE Technical report, CQ2017-98, January 2018. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suzuki, K., Maeda, Y. Ishibashi, Y., Fukushima, N.: Improvement of operability in remote robot control with force feedback. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), pp. 16-20, October 2015Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taguchi, E. Ishibashi, Y., Huang, P., Tateiwa, Y.: Experiment on collaborative work between remote robot systems with haptics. In: IEICE Global Conference, B-11-17, March 2018. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toyoda, Y., Ishibashi, Y., Huang, P., Tateiwa, Y., Watanabe, H.: Influence of network delay on efficiency of cooperative work with human in remote robot control with haptic sense. IEICE Technical report, CQ2018-9, April 2018. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taguchi, E., Ishibashi, Y., Huang, P., Tateiwa, Y., Miyoshi, T.: Comparison of stabilization control in cooperation between remote robot systems with force feedback. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Future Computer and Communication (ICFCC), February 2019Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toyoda, Y., Ishibashi, Y., Huang, P., Tateiwa, Y., Watanabe, H.: Follow-up control of robot position for hand delivery of object between remote robot systems with force feedback. IEICE Technical report, CQ2018-90, January 2019. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ITU-T Rec. I. 350: General aspects of quality of service and network performance in digital networks, March 1993Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ITU-T Rec. G. 100/P. 10 Amendment 1: New appendix I – Definition of quality of experience (QoE) (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    CR750/CR751 Controller Force Sense Function Instruction Manual. http://dl.mitsubishielectric.co.jp/dl/fa/members/document/manual/robot/bfp-a8947/bfp-a8947b.pdf. (in Japanese)
  19. 19.
    Electric gripper body (2 claws) Function Instruction Manual. http://www.taiyo-ltd.co.jp/products/electrically-powered/docs/Manual_esg1-2f_201508.pdf. (in Japanese)
  20. 20.
    CR750/CR751 series controller, CR800 series controller Ethernet Function Instruction Manual. http://dl.mitsubishielectric.co.jp/dl/fa/members/document/manual/robot/bfp-a3379/bfp-a3379b.pdf. (in Japanese)
  21. 21.
    Carson, M., Santay, D.: NIST Net - a Linux-based network emulation tool. ACM SIGCOMM 33(3), 111–126 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qin Qian
    • 1
  • Yutaka Ishibashi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pingguo Huang
    • 2
  • Yuichiro Tateiwa
    • 1
  1. 1.Nagoya Institute of TechnologyNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Seijoh UniversityTokaiJapan

Personalised recommendations