Ecosystem Services in the Service-Dominant Logic Framework

  • Jesse CaputoEmail author
  • Dalia D’Amato
  • Brent D. Matthies
Part of the World Forests book series (WFSE, volume 24)


The ecosystem services concept has become the predominant lens through which researchers and decision-makers view the relationship between natural ecosystems and human well-being. Over the past decades, a number of widely accepted classification systems, analytical methods, and a rich vocabulary around ecosystem services have evolved in the literature. Although there is widespread recognition that many ecosystem services are not exchanged in markets as commodities, many of these ecosystem service concepts and tools were built upon a theoretical foundation derived from neoclassical economics in which ecosystems are seen as passive production systems. Unfortunately, this perspective carries the potential to blind one to the complex interactions by which ecosystems, beneficiaries, and myriad other social actors interact to manage ecosystems and create human value. The service-dominant logic (S-D logic) framework, which views all value as being co-created by multiple actors engaged in the exchange of service, offers a valuable perspective by which the ecosystem services concept may be recast. Similarly, the ecosystem services lexicon can make important contributions to S-D logic by providing a means to describe and quantify the universal importance of natural ecosystems to human service systems. In this chapter, we briefly describe the ecosystem service concept and introduce the means for incorporating ecosystem services (as potential service offerings) into the S-D logic framework. We then use this modified framework to explore two case studies, recreation on U.S. family forests and a biodiversity market in Finland.


Biodiversity markets Ecosystem services Family forests Integrated service value creation framework Value networks 


  1. Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Baumgärtner, S., Fischer, J., Hanspach, J., et al. (2014). Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 103, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, M. (2017). Fostering sustainability by linking co-creation and relationship management concepts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman, I. J., Mace, G. M., Fezzi, C., Atkinson, G., & Turner, K. (2011). Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental & Resource Economics, 48, 177–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D., & Gordon, L. J. (2009). Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12, 1394–1404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bocken, N. M. P., Rana, P., & Short, S. W. (2015). Value mapping for sustainable business thinking. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32(1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulter, J. (Ed). (2011). Approach for reporting on ecosystem services: Incorporating ecosystem services into an organization’s performance initiative. Global Reporting Initiative. ISBN: 978-90-8866-0528.Google Scholar
  7. Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, B.J., Hewes, J.H., Dickinson, B., Andrejczyk, K., Butler, S.M., & Markowski-Lindsay, M. (2016). USDA forest service national woodland owner survey: National, regional, and state statistics for family forest and woodland ownerships with 10+ acres, 2011–2013. Res. Bull. NRS-99. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.Google Scholar
  9. Caputo, J. (2012). Commoditization and the origins of American silviculture. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 32, 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caputo, J., & Butler, B. (2017). Ecosystem service supply and capacity on U.S. family forestlands. Forests, 8(10), 395.Google Scholar
  11. Caputo, J., Beier, C. M., Groffman, P. M., Burns, D. A., Beall, F. D., et al. (2016). Effects of harvesting forest biomass on water and climate regulation services: A synthesis of long-term ecosystem experiments in Eastern North America. Ecosystems, 19, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, W., Chen, J. M., Price, D. T., Cihlar, J., & Liu, J. (2000). Carbon offset potentials of four alternative forest management strategies in Canada: A simulation study. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 5(2), 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costanza, R. (2008). Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 141, 350–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., et al. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., et al. (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daily, G. C., Soderqvist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., et al. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289, 395–396.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. D’Amato, D., Rekola, M., Wan, M., Cai, D., & Toppinen, A. (2017). Effects of industrial plantations on ecosystem services and livelihoods: Perspectives of rural communities in China. Land Use Policy, 63, 266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies, L., Kwiatkowski, L., Gaston, K. J., Beck, H., Brett, H., et al. (2011). Urban, Chapter 10. UK National Ecosystem Assessment, The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report (pp. 361–410). Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.Google Scholar
  19. de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., et al. (2015). The IPBES conceptual framework—Connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eriksson, E., Gillespie, A. R., Gustavsson, L., Langvall, O., Olsson, et al. (2007). Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37(3), 671–681.Google Scholar
  22. Finnish Forest Association. (2017). Forest ownership. Retrieved from January 19, 2018, from
  23. Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Froger, G., Boisvert, V., Méral, P., Le Coq, J. F., Caron, A., et al. (2015). Market-based instruments for ecosystem services between discourse and reality: An economic and narrative analysis. Sustainability, 7(9), 11595–11611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69, 1209–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. GRI. (2011). Approach for reporting on ecosystem services: Incorporating ecosystem services into an organizational performance disclosure. The Global Reporting Initiative.Google Scholar
  28. Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates? European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In D. Raffaelli & C. Frid (Eds.), Ecosystem ecology: A new synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series (pp. 110–139). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  30. Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2013). CICES V4.3—Report prepared following consultation on CICES version 4. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003.Google Scholar
  31. Hansjürgens, B., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Berghöfer, A., & Lienhoop, N. (2017). Justifying social values of nature: Economic reasoning beyond self-interested preferences. Ecosystem Services, 23, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hanson, C., Ranganathan, J., Iceland, C., & Finisdore, J. (2012). The corporate ecosystem services review: Guidelines for identifying business risks and opportunities arising from ecosystem change. Version 2.0. World Business Council for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  33. Harrison, P. A., Berry, P. M., Simpson, G., Haslett, J. R., Blicharska, M., Bucur, M., et al. (2014). Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 9, 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hirsch, F., Clark, D., Vihervaara, P., & Primmer, E. (2011). Payments for forest-related ecosystem services: What role for a green economy (30 pp.)? A background paper for a workshop on “Payments for ecosystem services: What role for a green economy? Concept, approaches and case studies”, Geneva 4–5 July 2011. Geneva: UNECE/FAO Forestry and Timber Section. Retrieved June 29, 2019, from
  35. Jäppinen, J. P., & Heliölä, J. P. (2015). Towards a sustainable and genuinely green economy: The value and social significance of ecosystem services in Finland. Helsinki: The Finnish Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
  36. Jax, K. (2005). Function and “functioning” in ecology: What does it mean? Oikos, 111(3), 641–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Juutinen, A., & Ollikainen, M. (2010). Conservation contracts for forest biodiversity: Theory and experience from Finland. Forest Science, 56, 201–211.Google Scholar
  38. Kettunen, M., Vihervaara, P., Kinnunen, S., D’Amato, D., Badura, T., et al. (2012). Socio-economic importance of ecosystem services in the Nordic Countries: Synthesis in the context of The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
  39. Kosoy, N., & Corbera, E. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological Economics, 69, 1228–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. La Notte, A., D’Amato, D., Mäkinen, H., Parracchini, M. L., Liquete, C., et al. (2017). Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecological Indicators, 74, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Laininen, J., & Matthies, B. D. (2017). How private finance can raise efficiency in conservation markets. Environmental finance. Retrieved September 28, 2017, from
  42. Landers, D. H., & Nahlik, A. M. (2013). Final ecosystem goods and services classification system (FEGS-CS). Report number EPA/600/R-13/ORD-004914. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).Google Scholar
  43. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maglio, P. P., Vargo, S. L., Caswell, N., & Spohrer, J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(4), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Matthies, B. D., & Valsta, L. T. (2016). Optimal forest species mixture with carbon storage and albedo effect for climate change mitigation. Ecological Economics, 123, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matthies, B., D’Amato, D., Berghäll, S., Ekholm, T., Hoen, H., et al. (2016a). An ecosystem service-dominant logic?—Integrating the ecosystem service approach and the service-dominant logic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Matthies, B. D., Kalliokoski, T., Eyvindson, K., Honkela, N., Hukkinen, J. I., et al. (2016b). Nudging service providers and assessing service trade-offs to reduce the social inefficiencies of payments for ecosystem services schemes. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 228–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Matthies, B. D., Vainio, A., & D’Amato, D. (2018). Not so biocentric—Environmental benefits and harm associated with the acceptance of forest management objectives by future environmental professionals. Ecosystem Services, 29, 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maxwell, D. (2017). Valuing natural capital: Future proofing business and finance. Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Metsonpolku. (2016). METSO forest biodiversity. Retrieved January 19, 2018, from
  52. Milder, J. C., Scherr, S. J., & Bracer, C. (2010). Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  54. Müller, F., & Burkhard, B. (2012). The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 1, 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Naeem, S. (2013). Ecosystem services: Is a planet servicing one species likely to function? In R. Rozzi (Ed.), Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: Values, philosophy, and action (pp. 303–321). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Norgaard, R. B. (2010). Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics, 69, 1219–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., et al. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peppard, J., & Rylander, A. (2006). From value chain to value network: Insights for mobile operators. European Management Journal, 24(2), 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peterson, M. J., Hall, D. M., Feldpausch-Parker, A. M., & Peterson, T. R. (2010). Obscuring ecosystem function with application of the ecosystem services concept: Essay. Conservation Biology, 24, 113–119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Pingoud, K., Pohjola, J., & Valsta, L. (2010). Assessing the integrated climatic impacts of forestry and wood products. Silva Fennica, 44(1), 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Polasky, S., & Segerson, K. (2009). Integrating ecology and economics in the study of ecosystem services: Some lessons learned. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1, 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Potschin, M. B., Primmer, E., Furman, E., & Haines-Young, R. H. (2016). Have ecosystem services been oversold? A response to Silvertown. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(5), 334–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Potschin-Young, M., Czùcz, B., Liquete, C., Maes, J., Rusch, G. M., et al. (2017). Intermediate ecosystem services: An empty concept? Ecosystem Services, 27, 124–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Potschin-Young, M., Haines-Young, R., Görg, C., Heink, U., Jax, K., et al. (2018). Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade. Ecosystem Services, 29, 428–440, Part C.Google Scholar
  66. Primmer, E., Jokinen, P., Blicharska, M., Barton, D. N., Bugter, R., et al. (2015). Governance of ecosystem services: A framework for empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services, 16, 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ramirez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Renard, D., Rhemtull, J. M., & Bennett, E. M. (2015). Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences, The United States of America, 112, 13411–13416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sandbrook, C. G., Fisher, J. A., & Vira, B. (2013). What do conservationists think about markets? Geoforum, 50, 232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sathre, R., & O’Connor, J. (2010). Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(2), 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schröter, M., Stumpf, K. H., Loos, J., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., et al. (2017). Refocusing ecosystem services towards sustainability. Ecosystem Services, 25, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Silvertown, J. (2015). Have ecosystem services been oversold? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(11), 641–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Smith, A., & Cannan, E. (2000). The wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  74. Smith, A. C., Harrison, P. A., Pérez Soba, M., Archaux, F., Blicharska, M., et al. (2017). How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: A typology derived from a systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 26, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spangenberg, J. H., von Haaren, C., & Settele, J. (2014). The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy. Ecological Economics, 104, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spash, C. L. (2015). Bulldozing biodiversity: The economics of offsets and trading-in nature. Biological Conservation, 192, 541–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Storbacka, K., & Lehtinen, J. R. (2001). Customer relationship management: Creating competitive advantage through win-win relationship strategies. Singapore: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  79. TEEB. (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity ecological and economic foundations. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  80. TEEB. (2012). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in business and enterprise. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  81. van den Belt, M., & Stevens, S. M. (2016). Transformative agenda, or lost in the translation? A review of top-cited articles in the first four years of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 22, 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vargo, S. L. (2009). Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: A service-dominant perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24(5–6), 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: What it is, what it is not, what it might be. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 43–56). Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc.Google Scholar
  85. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2017). Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vargo, S. L., & Morgan, F. W. (2005). Services in society and academic thought: An historical analysis. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Waage, S., & Kester, C. (2014). Private sector engagement with ecosystem services: March 2014 update. BSR.Google Scholar
  90. Wallace, K. J. (2007). Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 139(3–4), 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wallace, K. J., & Jago, M. (2017). Category mistakes: A barrier to effective environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 199, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zeithaml, V. A., Rust, R. T., & Lemon, K. N. (2001). The customer pyramid: Creating and serving profitable customers. California Management Review, 43(4), 118–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesse Caputo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dalia D’Amato
    • 2
  • Brent D. Matthies
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations