Advertisement

Social and Institutional Innovations in Family Forestry

  • Alice LudvigEmail author
  • Teppo Hujala
  • Ivana Živojinović
  • Gerhard Weiss
Chapter
Part of the World Forests book series (WFSE, volume 24)

Abstract

Over the last decade, the term social innovation has received increasing attention as a means to address complex global social problems and to add collective values. In earlier innovation research, the term “institutional innovation” was introduced to denote institutional efforts and the role of institutions in successful innovations. We detect overlaps between the two perspectives when it comes to innovation in family forestry. Overall, the forest sector has many potentials for fostering rural and community development and thus appears to be a promising field to adopt modes of social innovation in terms of collaborative competences in the co-creation of services and goods. Inherently, from a service dominant logic (S-D) perspective, dynamic capabilities of customer orientation, co-creation of needs and mutual exchange of knowledge can have substantial impact on the innovation outcomes in family forestry. The chapter examines collective action and collective benefits in forestry behind the background of concepts of social and institutional innovation. With innovative examples from forestry across Europe we show how both private and public-private collaborative efforts lead to successful innovation and we discuss the relevance of key service-logic aspects of social innovation to family forestry.

Keywords

Civil society engagement Forest services Institutional change Regional development Social forestry 

References

  1. Adloff, F. (2005). Zivilgesellschaft Theorie und politische Praxis. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Di Iacovo, F., Moruzzo, R., Rossignoli, C., & Scarpellini, A. (2014). Transition management and social innovation in rural Areas: Lessons from social farming. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 20(3), 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. European Union. (2010). Empowering people, driving change, social innovation in the European Union. European Commission, Bureau of European Policy Advisers (BEPA), Luxembourg: EUR-OP. Retrieved July 7, 2019, from http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/resource-hub/empowering-people-driving-change-social-innovation-in-the-european-union.
  4. European Union. (2014). Social innovation—A decade of changes, a BEPA report. European Bureau of Policy Advisers Luxembourg: EUR-OP. Retrieved June 28, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/13403/attachments/1/translations.
  5. Berry, L. L., Shankar, V., Parish, J. T., Cadwallader, S., & Dotzel, T. (2006). Creating new markets through service innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 56–63.Google Scholar
  6. Bock, B. (2012). Social Innovation and Sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 114, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press Books.Google Scholar
  9. Edquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovations. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 41–60). London and Washington: Pinter.Google Scholar
  10. Elsen, T. V., & Finuola, R. (2013). Policies and strategies of green care in Europe. In C. Gallis (Ed.), Green care for human therapy, social innovation, rural economy and education (pp. 189–215). New York: Nova Biomedical.Google Scholar
  11. Glazer, R. (1991). Marketing in an information intensive environment: Strategic implications of knowledge as an asset. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (2017). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hämäläinen, T., & Heiskala, R. (2007). Social innovations, institutional change and economic performance: Making sense of structural adjustment processes in industrial sectors, regions and societies. Cornwall: Edward Elgar in Association with Sitra, the Finnish Innovation Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haubenhofer, D., Elings, M., Hassink, J., & Hine, E. (2010). The development of green care in Western European countries. Explore, 6(2), 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howaldt, J., & Knopp, R. (2012). Shaping social innovation by social research. In H. W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, & J. Howaldt (Eds.), Challenge social innovation. potentials for business, social entrepreneurship and civil society (pp. 43–55). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Howaldt, J., Kopp, R., & Schwarz, M. (2015). Social innovations as drivers of social change—Exploring Tarde’s contribution to social innovation theory building. In A. Nicholls, J. Simon, & A. Gabriel (Eds.), New frontiers in social innovation research. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  17. Hurwicz, L. (1996). Institutions as families of game forms. Japanese Economic Review, 47, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ludvig, A., Corradini, G., Asamer-Handler, M., Pettenella, D., Verdejo, V., Martínez, S., et al. (2016a). The practice of innovation: The role of institutions in support of non-wood forest products. Bioproducts Business Journal, 1(6), 73–84.Google Scholar
  19. Ludvig, A., Tahvanainen, V., Dickson, A., Evard, C., Kurttila, M., Cosovic, M., et al. (2016b). The practice of entrepreneurship in the non-wood forest products sector: Support for Innovation on private forest land. Forest Policy and Economics, 66, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ludvig, A., Weiss, G., Živojinović, I., Nijnik, M., Miller, D., Berlagne, C., et al. (2017). Political framework conditions, policies and instruments for SIs in rural areas (36 pp.). Deliverable 6.1, Social Innovation in Marginalised Rural Areas (SIMRA).Google Scholar
  21. Ludvig, A., Wilding, M., Thorogood, A., & Weiss, G. (2018). Social innovation in the Welsh Woodlands: Community based forestry as collective third-sector engagement. Forest Policy and Economics, 95, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant (S-D) logic perspective. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 39(1), 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. NESTA, The Young Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Moulaert, F. (2013). The international handbook on social innovation. Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovation. Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162.Google Scholar
  26. Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2007). The global brain: Your roadmap for innovating faster and smarter in a networked world. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Neumeier, S. (2016). Social innovation in rural development: Identifying the key factors of success. The Geographical Journal, 183(1), 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD. (2011). Fostering innovation to address social challenges. In Workshop Proceedings, OECD Innovation Strategy. Retrieved June 28, 2017, from https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/47861327.pdf.
  29. Phills, J. A., Deigelmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Standford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.Google Scholar
  30. Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 878–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Polman, N., Slee, W., Kluvánková, T., Dijkshoorn, M., Nijnik, M., Gezik, V., et al. (2017). Classification of social innovations for marginalized rural areas (32 pp.) Deliverable 2.1, Social Innovation in Marginalised Rural Areas (SIMRA).Google Scholar
  32. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Renner, R., & Haubehofer, D. (2013). Political cultures reflected in the social recognition of new practices: A comparison of green care farming in Austria and the Netherlands. In C. Gallis (Ed.), Green care for human therapy, social innovation, rural economy and education (pp. 215–229). New York: Nova Biomedical.Google Scholar
  34. Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S., & Rockman, B. A. (2008). The oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ruttan, V. W. (2006). Social science knowledge and induced institutional innovation: An institutional design perspective. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2(3), 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sinclair, S., & Baglioni, S. (2014). Social innovation and social policy—Promises and risks. Social Policy and Society, 13, 469–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wieland, H., Koskela-Huotari, K., & Vargo, S. (2015). Extending actor participation in value creation: An institutional view. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24, 210–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weiss, G., Salka, J., Dobsinska, Z., Aggestam, F., Tykkä, S., Bauer, A., et al. (2010). Integrating innovation in forest and development policies: Comparative analysis of national policies across Europe. In E. Rametsteiner, G. Weiss, P. Ollonqvist, & B. Slee (Eds.), Policy integration and coordination: The case of innovation and the forest sector in Europe (pp. 41–85). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  42. Weiss, G. (2011). Theoretical approaches for the analysis of innovation processes and policies in the forest sector. In G. Weiss, D. Pettenella, P. Ollonqvist, & B. Slee (Eds.), Innovation in forestry: Territorial and value chain relationships (pp. 10–35). CABI.Google Scholar
  43. Weiss, G., Ollonqvist, P., & Slee, B. (2011). How to support Innovation in the forest sector: Summary and conclusions. In G. Weiss, D. Pettenella, P. Ollonqvist, & B. Slee (Eds.), Innovation in forestry: Territorial and value chain relationships (pp. 303–321). CABI.Google Scholar
  44. Whitehead, I., Hansmann, R., Lohrberg, F., Živojinović, I., Bernasconi, A., & Jones, N. (2017). The role of partnerships and the Third Sector in the development and delivery of urban forestry and green infrastructure. In D. Pearlmutter, C. Calfapietra, R. Samson, L. O’Brien, S. Krajter Ostoić, G. Sanesi, & R. Alonso del Amo (Eds.), The urban forest: Cultivating green infrastructure for people and the environment (pp. 259–282). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Wilkes-Allemann, J., & Ludvig, A. (2017, September 18–22). Social Innovation: Key for forest recreation infrastructure provisioning? Paper presented at 150 years anniversary IUFRO congress 2017, Freiburg All Division 4 Meeting “Forest Assessment, Modelling and Management”, Freiburg.Google Scholar
  46. Young Foundation. (2016). Social innovation policy—Where next? Retrieved June 28, 2017, from https://youngfoundation.org/publications/social-innovation-policy-in-europe-where-next/.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice Ludvig
    • 1
    Email author
  • Teppo Hujala
    • 2
  • Ivana Živojinović
    • 1
  • Gerhard Weiss
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences & European Forest InstituteViennaAustria
  2. 2.University of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations