• Raji SteineckEmail author


Temporality has served as a keyword to release the concept of time from the confines of a physicalist conception, to account for the plural ways time is realized in nature and human culture, and to tie it back to issues of human individual and social existence. This chapter traces the history and plural uses of the concept between Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and J.T. Fraser in order to elucidate its potential for the study of the future.


  1. Adam, Barbara. 1998. Timescapes of modernity: The environment and invisible hazards. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barbour, Julian. 2000. The end of time: The next revolution in physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blumenberg, Hans. 1966. Die Legitimität der Neuzeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  4. Callender, Craig. 2010. Is time an illusion? Scientific American 302 (6): 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canales, Jimena. 2016. Clock/lived. In Time: A vocabulary of the present, ed. Joel Burges and Amy J. Elias, 113–128. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fraser, J.T. 1966. The voices of time: A cooperative survey of man’s views of time as expressed by the sciences and by the humanities. New York: G. Braziller.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1999. Time, conflict, and human values. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hassan, Robert, and Ron E. Purser. 2007. 24/7: Time and temporality in the network society. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  9. Heidegger, Martin. 1993. Sein und Zeit. 17th ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  10. Heine, Steven. 1985. Existential and ontological dimensions of time in Heidegger und Dōgen. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. Heller, Michael. 1986. The direction of time: The great controversy. Astronomy Quarterly 5 (19): 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huisman, Rosemary. 2013. The origins of language and narrative temporalities. In Origins and futures time inflected and reflected, ed. Raji C. Steineck and Claudia Clausius, 50–76. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  13. Kern, Stephen. 2003. The culture of time and space, 1880–1918: With a new preface. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Koselleck, Reinhart. 1988. Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. 7th ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2003. Zeitschichten: Studien zur Historik. 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2004. Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Loy, David. 1992. What’s wrong with being and time: A Buddhist critique. Time & Society 1 (2): 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maki, Yūsuke. 2003. Jikan no hikaku shakaigaku. Tōkyō: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
  19. Man, Paul de. 1983. Blindness and insight: Essays in the rhetoric of contemporary criticism. Revised ed. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  21. Nowotny, Helga. 1989. Eigenzeit: Entstehung und Strukturierung eines Zeitgefühls. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1992. Time and social theory: Towards a social theory of time. Time & Society 1 (3): 421–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 1994. Time: The modern and postmodern experience. Trans. Neville Plaice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Postone, Moishe. 2004. Critique and historical transformation. Historical Materialism 12 (3): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Richelle, Marc, Helga Lejeune, Jean-Jacques Perikel, and Patrik Fery. 1985. From biotemporality to nootemporality: Toward an integrative and comparative view of time in behavior. In Time, mind, and behavior, ed. John A. Michon and Janet L. Jackson, 75–99. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roenneberg, Till, Karla V. Allebrandt, Martha Merrow, and Céline Vetter. 2012. Social jetlag and obesity. Current Biology 22 (10): 939–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosa, Hartmut. 2005. Beschleunigung. Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne. 10th ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Rosa, Hartmut, and Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. 2016. Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1943. L’être et le néant: Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  30. Steineck, Christian. 2010. Truth, time, and the extended Umwelt principle: Conceptual limits and methodological constraints. In Time: Limits and constraints, Study of Time 13, ed. Jo Alyson Parker, Paul A. Harris, and Christian Steineck, 350–365. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  31. Steineck, Raji C. 2017. Time in old Japan: In search of a paradigm. KronoScope 17 (1): 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stolorow, Robert D., George E. Atwood, and Donna M. Orange. 2010. Heidegger’s Nazism and the hypostatization of being. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology 5 (4): 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thompson, E.P. 1967. Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past & Present 38: 56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wolin, Richard. 2016. The politics of being: The political thought of Martin Heidegger. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zammito, John. 2004. Koselleck’s philosophy of historical time(s) and the practice of history. History and Theory 43 (1): 124–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ZurichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations