• Elisabeth Bronfen


The essay conceives of seriality in terms of an open-ended process, making use of dynamic repetition, so as to think about intertextuality as a sustained series of returns to cultural concerns and their aesthetic shapings, addressing a continual haunting of the present by the past. The discussion of a set of contemporary TV dramas—Mad Men, The Wire, and Westworld—serves to illustrate how this particular aesthetic form itself reflects on seriality as a dynamic repetition.


  1. Benjamin, Walter. 1996. The task of the translator. In Selected writings. Volume 1. 1913–1926, ed. Marcus Bullock and Michael W. Jennings, 253–263. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. Difference and repetition. Trans. Paul Patton. Rev. ed. New York City: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 1983. Essays & lectures. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
  4. Felman, Shoshana. 1977. Turning the screw of interpretation. Yale French Studies 55/56: 94–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freud, Sigmund. [1914] 1958. Remembering, repeating and working through. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 7. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  6. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1980. Zur Genealogie der Moral. Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe, vol. 5. Ed. Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari. München: DTV.Google Scholar
  7. Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. 1980. The paradoxical status of repetition. Poetics Today 1 (4): 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shelley, Mary. [1818] 1986. Frankenstein. Introduction to the 1831 edition. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabeth Bronfen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ZurichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations