Advertisement

Play

  • Fabian SchäferEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses different ways in which the term “play” has been used and conceptualized. Starting from an etymological overview, it demonstrates how play was and is understood as an activity liberated from the constraints of necessity. Despite this “unserious” character, however, “play” may have implications for the possible future.

References

  1. Abe, Kōbō. [1958/59] 1970. Inter ice age 4. New York: Tuttle.Google Scholar
  2. Adamowsky, Natascha. 2000. Spielfiguren in virtuellen Welten. Frankfurt a. M: Campus.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2005. Spiel und Wissenschaftskultur. Eine Einleitung. In “Die Vernunft ist mir noch nicht begegnet.” Zum konstitutiven Verhältnis von Spiel und Erkenntnis, ed. Natascha Adamowsky, 11–30. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  4. Asada, Akira. 1983. Kōzō to chikara: Kigō-ron o koete. Tōkyō: Keisō shobō.Google Scholar
  5. Ästhetische Grundbegriffe: Historisches Wörterbuch in sieben Bänden [ÄGB]. Ed. Karlheinz Barck, Martin Fontius, Dieter Schlenstedt, Burkhart Steinwachs, and Friedrich Wolfzettel. 5. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2000–2005.Google Scholar
  6. Bogost, Ian. 2006. Unit operations: An approach to videogame criticism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Caillois, Roger. 2001. Man, play, and games. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  8. Daliot-Bul, Michal. 2014. License to play: The ludic in Japanese culture. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In A postmodern reader, ed. L. Hutcheon, 278–294. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. [1960] 2004. Truth and method. 2nd Rev. ed. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Gombrich, Ernst H. 1963. Meditations on a hobby horse and other essays on the theory of art. London: Phaeton.Google Scholar
  12. Heidemann, Ingeborg. 1968. Der Begriff des Spiels und das ästhetische Weltbild der Philosophie der Gegenwart. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  13. Huizinga, Johan. 1955. Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jameson, Fredric. 2004. Archaeologies of the future: The desire called utopia and other science fictions. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  15. Malaby, Thomas M. 2007. Beyond play: A new approach to games. Games and Culture 2 (2): 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marcuse, Herbert. [1964] 2013. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Minnema, Lourens. 1998. Play and (post)modern culture: An essay on changes in the scientific interest in the phenomenon of play. Cultural Dynamics 10 (1): 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ueno, Chizuko. 1987. ‘Watashi’ sagashi gēmu: yokubō shimin shakai-ron. Tōkyō: Chikuma shobō.Google Scholar
  19. Walton, Kendall L. 1973. Pictures and make-believe. Philosophical Review 82 (3): 283–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations