Advertisement

Planning

  • Julia ObertreisEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Planning is a culturally specific practice that renders general ideas of the future concrete and projects the future as manageable. The chapter fleshes out an interdisciplinary approach to planning and surveys historical contexts from antiquity to the twentieth century.

References

  1. Abram, Simone, and Gisa Weszkalnys. 2011. Introduction: Anthropologies of planning – Temporality, imagination, and ethnography. Focaal – Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 61: 3–18.Google Scholar
  2. Brady, Andrea, and Emily Butterworth. 2010. Introduction. In The uses of the future in early modern Europe, ed. Andrea Brady and Emily Butterworth, 1–18. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke, Peter. 2010. Foreword: The history of the future, 1350–2000. In The uses of the future in early modern Europe, ed. Andrea Brady and Emily Butterworth, ix–xx. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Eckert, Andreas. 2008. ‘We are all planners now.’ Planung und Dekolonisation in Afrika. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 34 (3): 375–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellman, Michael. 2007. The rise and fall of socialist planning. In Transition and beyond. Essays in honor of Mario Nuti, ed. Saul Estrin, Grzegorz W. Kolodko, and Milica Uvalic, 17–34. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2014. Socialist planning. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huber, Valeska. 2017. Introduction. Global histories of social planning. Journal of Contemporary History 52 (1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klages, Helmut. 1978. Planung – Entwicklung – Entscheidung. Wird Geschichte herstellbar? Historische Zeitschrift 226: 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sorensen, André. 2002. The making of urban Japan. Cities and planning from Edo to the twenty-first century. Oxon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. van Laak, Dirk. 2008. Planung. Geschichte und Gegenwart des Vorgriffs auf die Zukunft. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 34 (3): 305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations