Advertisement

The Neuroscience of Team Collaboration During a Design Thinking Event in Naturalistic Settings

  • Naama MayselessEmail author
  • Grace Hawthorne
  • Allan Reiss
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Innovation book series (UNDINNO)

Abstract

While previous studies have begun to investigate the neuroscience of design thinking, current knowledge is still limited. One limitation faced to date, is the need for a naturalistic design methodology that can incorporate the inherit properties of design thinking in a neuroscientific design. Here we will introduce the concept of neuroscience in design thinking both at the individual level as well as in teams and propose an experimental design to study the neuroscience of design that imposes as little constraints as possible on the natural flow of team collaboration during a design thinking event.

References

  1. Alexiou, K., et al. (2009). Exploring the neurological basis of design cognition using brain imaging: some preliminary results. Design Studies, 30(6), 623–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron, A. R., et al. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(4), 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, J. M., et al. (2016). Sex differences in neural and behavioral signatures of cooperation revealed by fNIRS hyperscanning. Scientific reports, 6, 26492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baruah, J., & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Enhancing group creativity: The search for synergy. In Creativity in groups (pp. 29–56), Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  5. Beaty, R. E., et al. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific reports, 5, 10964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Begliomini, C., Cavallo, A., Manera, V., Becchio, C., Stramare, R., Miotto, D., & Castiello, U. (2017). Potential for social involvement modulates activity within the mirror and the mentalizing systems. Scientific reports, 7(1), 14967.Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carson, S. H., et al. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r). The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, 2(2), 179–198.Google Scholar
  10. Cui, X., et al. (2011). A quantitative comparison of NIRS and fMRI across multiple cognitive tasks. Neuroimage, 54(4), 2808–2821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cui, X., et al. (2012). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. Neuroimage, 59(3), 2430–2437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delis, D. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function scale (D-KEFS). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  13. Dinar, M., et al. (2015). Empirical studies of designer thinking: past, present, and future. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(2), 021101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellamil, M., et al. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. Neuroimage, 59(2), 1783–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Funane, T., et al. (2011). Synchronous activity of two people’s prefrontal cortices during a cooperative task measured by simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 16(7), 077011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garavan, H., et al. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(14), 8301–8306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert, S. J., et al. (2010). Involvement of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in ill-structured design cognition: an fMRI study. Brain Research, 1312, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence.Google Scholar
  20. Hirsch, J., et al. (2018). A cross-brain neural mechanism for human-to-human verbal communication. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 13(9), 907–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holper, L., et al. (2012). Between-brain connectivity during imitation measured by fNIRS. Neuroimage, 63(1), 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Iacoboni, M., & Dapretto, M. (2006). The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(12), 942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiang, J., et al. (2015). Leader emergence through interpersonal neural synchronization. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 201422930.Google Scholar
  24. Jiang, J., et al. (2012). Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 16064–16069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kowatari, Y., et al. (2009). Neural networks involved in artistic creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 30(5), 1678–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lazar, L. (2018). The cognitive neuroscience of design creativity. Journal of Experimental Neuroscience, 12, 1179069518809664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS ONE, 3(2), e1679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu, N., Mok, C., Witt, E. E., Pradhan, A. H., Chen, J. E., & Reiss, A. L. (2016). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals inter-brain neural synchronization during cooperative Jenga game with face-to-face communication. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 10, 82.Google Scholar
  29. Lu, K., et al. (2018). Cooperation makes a group be more creative. Cerebral Cortex.Google Scholar
  30. Mayseless, N., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2015). Enhancing verbal creativity: modulating creativity by altering the balance between right and left inferior frontal gyrus with tDCS. Neuroscience, 291, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Monden, Y., et al. (2012). Clinically-oriented monitoring of acute effects of methylphenidate on cerebral hemodynamics in ADHD children using fNIRS. Clinical Neurophysiology, 123(6), 1147–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Montague, P. R., et al. (2002). Hyperscanning: simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Osaka, N., et al. (2015). How two brains make one synchronized mind in the inferior frontal cortex: fNIRS-based hyperscanning during cooperative singing. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pan, Y., et al. (2018). Interpersonal synchronization of inferior frontal cortices tracks social interactive learning of a song. Neuroimage, 183, 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saggar, M., et al. (2015). Pictionary-based fMRI paradigm to study the neural correlates of spontaneous improvisation and figural creativity. Scientific reports, 5, 10894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3–4), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams-an analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23(5), 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stephens, G. J., et al. (2010). Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(32), 14425–14430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Torrance, E. (1974). The torrance tests of creative thinking-TTCT manual and scoring guide: Verbal test a, figural test. Lexington, KY: Ginn.Google Scholar
  41. Wang, M.-Y., et al. (2018). Concurrent mapping of brain activation from multiple subjects during social interaction by hyperscanning: a mini-review. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 8(8), 819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wechsler, D. (2011). WASI-II: Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. PsychCorp.Google Scholar
  43. Xue, H., et al. (2018). Cooperation makes two less-creative individuals turn into a highly-creative pair. Neuroimage, 172, 527–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Hasso Plattner Institute of Design (d.School)StanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations