Advertisement

Overcoming Prominent Pitfalls of Work Space (Re-)Design: Using a Theoretical Perspective to Reflect and Shape Practice

  • Martin SchwemmleEmail author
  • Marie Klooker
  • Claudia Nicolai
  • Ulrich Weinberg
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Innovation book series (UNDINNO)

Abstract

Companies are recognizing more and more the potential of work spaces to increase their employees’ creativity, well-being, and performance. However, (re-)designing work space is not an easy task and, hence, many companies ask for recommendations and advice from a researcher’s perspective. Taking these rising demands and experiences with work space design projects in organizations as a starting point, we link a practitioner’s with a researcher’s view. In this chapter we present prominent pitfalls of workspace (re-)design through the lens of theories, selected concepts, and frameworks. In particular, we deal with the three issues of (1) a too narrow understanding of work space, (2) a lack of understanding of the status quo, and (3) a missing awareness of the behavioral component of space and its potential for change management. Perspectives from theory give enhanced reflection on each issue. In addition, tools and examples allow us to transfer the theoretical knowledge into action in form of workshops or initiatives as part of a space (re-)design project. Researchers receive an overview of the issues that are relevant for practitioners and which also indicate topics for further research. Practitioners are provided with a better understanding of relevant concepts and actionable tools for their work space-related projects.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank Theresa Weinstein for her valuable comments to earlier versions of the manuscript and the numerous participants of our space workshops for their valuable feedback to our spatial exercises. Additional thanks to Dr. Sharon Nemeth for her copyediting support.

References

  1. Bacevice, P., Burow, L., & Triebner, M. (2016). 7 factors of great office design. Harvard Business Review, 2–8.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, M., & Ringel, R. (2018, February). Plan a better meeting with design thinking. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  4. Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15, 181–195.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, C. M., Hall, T., Dillon, K., & Duncan, D. S. (2016). Competing against luck. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  6. Dawkins, S., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Martin, A. (2017). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 163–183.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Jong, C. W. (2017). Ten principles for good design: Dieter Rams. Munich, London, New York: Prestel.Google Scholar
  8. Elsbach, K. D., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 181–224.  https://doi.org/10.1080/078559809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fayard, A.-L., & Weeks, J. (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28, 605–634.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frederick, C. (1915). Household engineering. Chicago: American School of Home Economics.Google Scholar
  11. Gensler. (2016). US Workplace Survey 2016. https://www.gensler.com/research-insight/workplace-surveys/us/2016 (accessed August 2, 2019).
  12. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  13. Hofer, C. (1996). The metaphysics of space-time substantivalism. Journal of Philosophy, 93, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/2941016.
  14. Jerram, L. (2011). Cultural geographies kitchen sink dramas: Women, modernity and space in Weimar Germany. Cultural Geographies, 13, 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006cgj374oa.
  15. Klooker, M., Nicolai, C., Matzdorf, S., et al. (2016). On creating workspaces for a team of teams: Learnings from a case study. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research (pp. 67–84). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Brighton: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kristensen, T. (2004). The physical context of creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar, V. (2013). 101 design methods. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Laing, A., Craig, D., & White, A. (2011). High-performance office space. Harvard Business Review, 89, 32–33.Google Scholar
  20. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Löw, M. (2008). The constitution of space: The structuration of spaces through the simultaneity of effect and perception. European Journal Social Theory, 11, 25–49.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007085286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., et al. (2007). Innovation spaces: Towards a framework for understanding the role of the physical environment in innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 53–65.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00419.x.
  23. Museum of Modern Art. (2010). The frankfurt kitchen. https://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2010/counter_space/the_frankfurt_kitchen/(accessed January 4, 2019).
  24. Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The of effect market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54, 20–35.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1251757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Noever, P. (Ed.). (1992). Die Frankfurter Küche: Edition Axel Menges. Berlin: Ernst, Wilhelm & Sohn.Google Scholar
  26. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Orlikowski, W. J. (2015). Practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (2nd ed., pp. 33–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perlow, L. A., Hadley, C. N., & Eun, E. (2017). Stop the meeting madness. Harvard Business Review, 20, 61–69.Google Scholar
  29. Phelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 1115–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640.
  30. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2011). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Porter, M. E., & Nohria, N. (2018, July–August). How CEOs manage time. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  32. Sartre, J.-P. (1956). Being and nothingness: A phenomenological essay on ontology. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Schwemmle M., Nicolai C., Klooker M., & Weinberg U. (2018). From Place to Space: How to Conceptualize Places for Design Thinking. In: Plattner H., Meinel C., & Leifer L. (Eds) Design Thinking Research. Understanding Innovation (pp. 275–298). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60967-6_14.
  35. Shapiro, L. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Steelcase. (2016). Steelcase global report: Engagement and the global workplace, 1–249.Google Scholar
  37. Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2004). Inspiration: Core characteristics, component processes, antecedents, and function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 957–973.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27, 613–634.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606064101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Schwemmle
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marie Klooker
    • 1
  • Claudia Nicolai
    • 1
  • Ulrich Weinberg
    • 1
  1. 1.HPI School of Design ThinkingHasso Plattner Institute for Digital EngineeringPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations