Overcoming Prominent Pitfalls of Work Space (Re-)Design: Using a Theoretical Perspective to Reflect and Shape Practice
Companies are recognizing more and more the potential of work spaces to increase their employees’ creativity, well-being, and performance. However, (re-)designing work space is not an easy task and, hence, many companies ask for recommendations and advice from a researcher’s perspective. Taking these rising demands and experiences with work space design projects in organizations as a starting point, we link a practitioner’s with a researcher’s view. In this chapter we present prominent pitfalls of workspace (re-)design through the lens of theories, selected concepts, and frameworks. In particular, we deal with the three issues of (1) a too narrow understanding of work space, (2) a lack of understanding of the status quo, and (3) a missing awareness of the behavioral component of space and its potential for change management. Perspectives from theory give enhanced reflection on each issue. In addition, tools and examples allow us to transfer the theoretical knowledge into action in form of workshops or initiatives as part of a space (re-)design project. Researchers receive an overview of the issues that are relevant for practitioners and which also indicate topics for further research. Practitioners are provided with a better understanding of relevant concepts and actionable tools for their work space-related projects.
The authors want to thank Theresa Weinstein for her valuable comments to earlier versions of the manuscript and the numerous participants of our space workshops for their valuable feedback to our spatial exercises. Additional thanks to Dr. Sharon Nemeth for her copyediting support.
- Bacevice, P., Burow, L., & Triebner, M. (2016). 7 factors of great office design. Harvard Business Review, 2–8.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, M., & Ringel, R. (2018, February). Plan a better meeting with design thinking. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
- Christensen, C. M., Hall, T., Dillon, K., & Duncan, D. S. (2016). Competing against luck. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- de Jong, C. W. (2017). Ten principles for good design: Dieter Rams. Munich, London, New York: Prestel.Google Scholar
- Frederick, C. (1915). Household engineering. Chicago: American School of Home Economics.Google Scholar
- Gensler. (2016). US Workplace Survey 2016. https://www.gensler.com/research-insight/workplace-surveys/us/2016 (accessed August 2, 2019).
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Hofer, C. (1996). The metaphysics of space-time substantivalism. Journal of Philosophy, 93, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/2941016.
- Jerram, L. (2011). Cultural geographies kitchen sink dramas: Women, modernity and space in Weimar Germany. Cultural Geographies, 13, 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006cgj374oa.
- Klooker, M., Nicolai, C., Matzdorf, S., et al. (2016). On creating workspaces for a team of teams: Learnings from a case study. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research (pp. 67–84). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Brighton: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Kumar, V. (2013). 101 design methods. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Laing, A., Craig, D., & White, A. (2011). High-performance office space. Harvard Business Review, 89, 32–33.Google Scholar
- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Moultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., et al. (2007). Innovation spaces: Towards a framework for understanding the role of the physical environment in innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00419.x.
- Museum of Modern Art. (2010). The frankfurt kitchen. https://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2010/counter_space/the_frankfurt_kitchen/(accessed January 4, 2019).
- Noever, P. (Ed.). (1992). Die Frankfurter Küche: Edition Axel Menges. Berlin: Ernst, Wilhelm & Sohn.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Perlow, L. A., Hadley, C. N., & Eun, E. (2017). Stop the meeting madness. Harvard Business Review, 20, 61–69.Google Scholar
- Phelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 1115–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640.
- Porter, M. E., & Nohria, N. (2018, July–August). How CEOs manage time. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
- Sartre, J.-P. (1956). Being and nothingness: A phenomenological essay on ontology. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Schwemmle M., Nicolai C., Klooker M., & Weinberg U. (2018). From Place to Space: How to Conceptualize Places for Design Thinking. In: Plattner H., Meinel C., & Leifer L. (Eds) Design Thinking Research. Understanding Innovation (pp. 275–298). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60967-6_14.
- Shapiro, L. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Steelcase. (2016). Steelcase global report: Engagement and the global workplace, 1–249.Google Scholar