Advertisement

Understanding the Nature and Consequences of Social Mobility Beliefs

  • Martin V. DayEmail author
  • Susan T. Fiske
Chapter

Abstract

People commonly hold beliefs about social mobility, that is, perceptions of the likelihood to move up or down in society. What impact, if any, do these beliefs have on inequality, the societal status quo, and people’s own lives? How accurate are these views of where people end up in life and why? How can we characterize these beliefs? Through a review of existing research, we clarify the nature of social mobility beliefs and conceptualize how these beliefs affect society and individuals. For society, a consistent pattern emerges. Belief in social mobility leads to defense of the status quo and tolerance for inequality, but as we conceptualize, this occurs for abstract rather than concrete attitudes. On the personal level, social mobility beliefs relate to well-being and can affect the attainment of status-related goals, but this depends on individual difference factors, as well as the outcome being considered. This chapter also outlines opportunities for further research.

Keywords

Social mobility Economic inequality Status quo Rationalization Social status Well-being Goals Achievement 

References

  1. Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alcántara, C., Chen, C. N., & Alegría, M. (2014). Do post-migration perceptions of social mobility matter for Latino immigrant health? Social Science & Medicine, 101, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alesina, A., Stantcheva, S., & Teso, E. (2018). Intergenerational mobility and preferences for redistribution. American Economic Review, 108, 521–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2018). World inequality report 2018. World Inequality Lab.Google Scholar
  7. Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Augoustinos, M., & Callaghan, P. (2019). The language of social inequality. In K. Peters & J. Jetten (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Bartels, L. M. (2005). Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics, 3, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benabou, R., & Ok, E. A. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The POUM hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 447–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Browman, A. S., Destin, M., Carswell, K. L., & Svoboda, R. C. (2017). Perceptions of socioeconomic mobility influence academic persistence among low socioeconomic status students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Dotsch, R., Cooley, E., & Payne, B. K. (2017). The relationship between mental representations of welfare recipients and attitudes toward welfare. Psychological Science, 28, 92–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., & McKee, S. (2017). Political action in the age of high-economic inequality: A multilevel approach. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11, 232–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bullock, H. E. (2008). Justifying inequality: A social psychological analysis of beliefs about poverty and the poor. In A. C. Lin & D. R. Harris (Eds.), The colors of poverty: Why racial and ethnic disparities persist (pp. 52–76). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Bullock, H. E., & Limbert, W. M. (2003). Scaling the socioeconomic ladder: Low-income women’s perceptions of class status and opportunity. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K., & Heesacker, M. (2015). Perceptions of US social mobility are divided (and distorted) along ideological lines. Psychological Science, 26, 413–423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., Saez, E., & Turner, N. (2014). Is the United States still a land of opportunity? Recent trends in intergenerational mobility. American Economic Review, 104, 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808–822.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davidai, S., & Gilovich, T. (2015a). What goes up apparently needn’t come down: Asymmetric predictions of ascent and descent in rankings. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davidai, S., & Gilovich, T. (2015b). Building a more mobile America – One income quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 60–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Davidai, S., & Gilovich, T. (2018). How should we think about Americans’ beliefs about economic mobility? Judgment and Decision making, 13, 297–304.Google Scholar
  26. Dawtry, R. J., Sutton, R. M., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Social sampling, perceptions of wealth distribution, and support for redistribution. In K. Peters & J. Jetten (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Day, M. V., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Movin’ on up? How perceptions of social mobility affect our willingness to defend the system. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 267–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Duru-Bellat, M., & Kieffer, A. (2008). Objective/subjective: The two facets of social mobility. Sociologie du Travail, 50, e1–e18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fiske, S. T., & Durante, F. (2019). Mutual status stereotypes maintain inequality. In K. Peters & J. Jetten (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Gilens, M. (1996). Race and poverty in America: Public misperceptions and the American news media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hauser, O. P., & Norton, M. I. (2017). (Mis) perceptions of inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 21–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Henry, P. J., Reyna, C., & Weiner, B. (2004). Hate welfare but help the poor: How the attributional content of stereotypes explains the paradox of reactions to the destitute in America. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Higgins, T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology, handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hout, M. (2015). A summary of what we know about social mobility. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 657, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jaime-Castillo, A. M., & Marques-Perales, I. (2014). Beliefs about social fluidity and preferences for social policies. Journal of Social Policy, 43, 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jost, J. T. (2017). Working class conservatism: A system justification perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 73–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 305–358.Google Scholar
  42. Kelley, S. M. C., & Kelley, C. G. E. (2009). Subjective social mobility: Data from 30 nations. In M. Haller, R. Jowell, & T. W. Smith (Eds.), Charting the globe: The international social survey programme (pp. 1984–2009). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Kim, E., Pedersen, R. T., & Mutz, D. C. (2016). What do Americans talk about when they talk about inequality? Working Paper, SSRN.Google Scholar
  44. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  45. Kraus, M. W. (2015). Americans still overestimate social class mobility: A pre-registered self-replication. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1709.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Kraus, M. W., & Tan, J. J. X. (2015). Americans overestimate social class mobility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kuziemko, I., Buell, R. W., Reich, T., & Norton, M. I. (2014). “Last-place aversion”: Evidence and redistributive implications. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 105–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lane, R. E. (2001). Self-reliance and empathy: The enemies of poverty—And of the poor. Political Psychology, 22, 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  51. Major, B., Gramzow, R. H., McCoy, S. K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mandisodza, A. N., Jost, J. T., & Unzueta, M. M. (2006). “Tall poppies” and “American dreams” reactions to rich and poor in Australia and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Marmot, M. G. (2003). Understanding social inequalities in health. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46, S9–S23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McCall, L., & Kenworthy, L. (2009). Americans’ social policy preferences in the era of rising inequality. Perspectives on Politics, 7, 459–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Meraviglia, C. (2017). The social ladder: Status mobility across time and countries. In J. Edlund, I. Bechert, & M. Quandt (Eds.), Social inequality in the eyes of the public: A collection of analyses based on ISSP data 1987-2009 (GESIS-Volume 17) (pp. 13–33). Mannheim: Germany. GESIS-Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57227-8; https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57227-8
  58. Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 188–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Oyserman, D., Destin, M., & Novin, S. (2015). The context-sensitive future self: Possible selves motivate in context, not otherwise. Self and Identity, 14, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oyserman, D., Terry, K., & Bybee, D. (2002). A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 3113–3326.Google Scholar
  61. Peetz, J., & Wohl, M. J. (2018). Perceiving time through group-based glasses: Collective temporal orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, Advance Online Publication., 58, 609.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pettigrew, T. F. (2016). In pursuit of three theories: Authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 1–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Pickett, K. E., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2015). Income inequality and health: A causal review. Social Science & Medicine, 128, 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2018). Unpacking the inequality paradox: The psychological roots of inequality and social class. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 57, pp. 53–124). Cambridge: MA, USA, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  65. Piketty, T. (1995). Social mobility and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 551–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pringle, H. (2014). The ancient roots of the 1%. Science, 344, 822–825.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. The Journal of Politics, 64, 1021–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Ross, M., & Wilson, A. E. (2002). It feels like yesterday: Self-esteem, valence of personal past experiences, and judgments of subjective distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 792–803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Sawhill, I., & Morton, J. E. (2007). Economic mobility: Is the American dream alive and well? Washington, DC: Pew Economic Mobility Project.Google Scholar
  73. Schmidt, A. (2010). The experience of social mobility and the formation of attitudes towards income redistribution (GK Soclife Working Papers Series, 6). University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
  74. Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2008). Nostalgia: Past, present, and future. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shariff, A. F., Wiwad, D., & Aknin, L. B. (2016). Income mobility breeds tolerance for income inequality: Cross-national and experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 373–380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Smith, K. B., & Stone, L. H. (1989). Rags, riches, and bootstraps: Beliefs about the causes of wealth and poverty. Sociological Quarterly, 30, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Steele, L. G. (2015). Income inequality, equal opportunity, and attitudes about redistribution. Social Science Quarterly, 96, 444–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sternberg, R. J. (2017). Intelligence and competence in theory and practice. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation, second edition (pp. 9–24). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  81. Swan, L. K., Chambers, J. R., Heesacker, M., & Nero, S. S. (2017). How should we measure Americans’ perceptions of socio-economic mobility? Judgment and Decision making, 12, 507–515.Google Scholar
  82. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tabri, N., Dupuis, D. R., Kim, H. S., & Wohl, M. J. (2015). Economic mobility moderates the effect of relative deprivation on financial gambling motives and disordered gambling. International Gambling Studies, 15, 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Van Eerder, W., & Thierry, H. (1996). Vroom’s expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vaquera, E., & Aranda, E. (2017). Moving up and down the ladder: Perceived social mobility and emotional dispositions among south Florida’s immigrants. Sociological Forum, 32, 793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vignoles, V. L., Manzi, C., Regalia, C., Jemmolo, S., & Scabini, E. (2008). Identity motives underlying desired and feared possible future selves. Journal of Personality, 76, 1165–1200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Vroom, V. H. (1995). Work and motivation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  90. Westoff, C. F., Bressler, M., & Sagi, P. C. (1960). The concept of social mobility: An empirical inquiry. American Sociological Review, 25, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2011). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  92. Williams, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2008). Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1033–1047.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2000). The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people’s personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 928–942.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Wiwad, D. C. M. (2015). The rags-to-riches story of income mobility and its impact on emotional well-being (MA thesis, Simon Fraser University).Google Scholar
  95. Yoon, S., & Kim, H. C. (2016). Keeping the American dream alive: The interactive effect of perceived economic mobility and materialism on impulsive spending. Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 759–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Yoon, S., & Kim, H. C. (2018). Feeling economically stuck: The effect of perceived economic mobility and socioeconomic status on variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 1141–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zanna, M. P., Olson, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980). Attitude–behavior consistency: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 432–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Memorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada
  2. 2.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations