Advertisement

Reporting Violent Death: Networks of Expertise and the Scottish Post-mortem

  • Nicholas Duvall
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Histories of Policing, Punishment and Justice book series (PHPPJ)

Abstract

This chapter uses a 1933 Dumfries murder case to examine an aspect of the practice of the medico-legal post-mortem examination in Scotland. While the initial autopsy was conducted by two local doctors, an Edinburgh-based expert was also asked to give an opinion about the death after the fact. This system where prosecutors were able to obtain non-local expertise was facilitated by a feature of the Scottish system, mandatory written reports by expert witnesses. Reports were structured such that the observations of the doctor performing the original post-mortem could be interpreted by other doctors reading the report, sometimes in conjunction with analysing samples, allowing them to form separate opinions. Far from preventing debate among experts, other cases demonstrate that they prompted experts to form diverging opinions.

Archives

  1. Littlejohn, H.H., Post-mortem notebooks, Edinburgh University Library Special Collections, EUA IN1/ACU/F1/2.Google Scholar
  2. National Records of Scotland, Papers relating to Appeal against conviction of John Maxwell Muir, NRS JC34/1/135.Google Scholar
  3. National Records of Scotland, Trial papers in case of John Maxwell Muir, National Records of Scotland, JC26/1933/98.Google Scholar
  4. Smith, S.A., Papers and photographs on forensic medicine, Edinburgh University Library Special Collections, MS. 2753.Google Scholar

Bibliography

  1. Burney, I., Bodies of Evidence: Medicine and the Politics of the English Inquest, 1830–1926, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Crowther, M.A. and White, B., On Soul and Conscience: The Medical Expert and Crime: 150 Years of Forensic Medicine in Glasgow, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. Dewar, D., Criminal Procedure in England and Scotland, Edinburgh: W Green, 1913.Google Scholar
  4. ‘Dumfries murder trial: Special plea of temporary insanity: Dramatic story at High Court: Brother’s tragic discovery: Extracts from dead woman’s diary: Judge and child witnesses’, Dumfries and Galloway Standard, 12 April 1933.Google Scholar
  5. ‘Dumfries Tragedy: Young married woman found dead: Husband arrested’, Dumfries and Galloway Standard, 21 January 1933.Google Scholar
  6. Glaister, J., Sr., A Text-Book of Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology, 3rd ed., Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone, 1915.Google Scholar
  7. Joyce, F., ‘Experts, laymen, and the identification of Cora Crippen: An exercise in medicolegal cooperation’, Medico-Legal Journal, 2011, 79(2): 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kerr, D.J.A., Forensic Medicine: A Text-Book for Students and a Guide for the Practitioner, London: A & C Black, 1936.Google Scholar
  9. ‘Reprieved’, Dumfries and Galloway Standard, 13 May 1933.Google Scholar
  10. ‘Sentenced to death: Dumfries man guilty of murder: Unanimous verdict by jury: Closing scenes in High Court trial: Execution fixed for May 4’, Dumfries and Galloway Standard, 15 April 1933.Google Scholar
  11. Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S., Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, S.A., Forensic Medicine: A Textbook for Students and Practitioners, London: J. & A. Churchill, 1925.Google Scholar
  13. ‘The Reprieve petition’, Dumfries and Galloway Standard, 29 April 1933.Google Scholar
  14. Timmermans, S., Postmortem: How Medical Examiners Explain Suspicious Deaths, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Duvall
    • 1
  1. 1.EdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations