Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Terry Thomas
  • Kevin Bennett
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter draws together some of the themes of the book. The structure of the criminal record disclosure arrangements and then the addition of the arrangements to disclose ‘non conviction information’. It also looks at how employers in receipt of this information assess and use it to make employment selection decisions; the fear is that some employers make no assessments at all but require there to be completely ‘clear sheets’. The chapter also examines the literature that suggests this ‘non conviction information’ is of any assistance to employers and notes the paucity of such supporting literature. It examines the degree of ‘stigma’ that may fall on job applicants and the degree to which the disclosure of ‘non conviction information’ may even be undermining the mainstream criminal justice process. The start of discussions to completely review the system to make it simpler and more transparent are noted.

Keywords

Recruitment decisions by employers Law commission Stigma 

References

  1. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers)/DBS (Disclosure and Barring Service). (2014a). Quality Assurance Framework. Version 9 (QAF v9). Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/quality-assurance-framework-version-nine-qaf-v9. Accessed 19 November 2018.
  2. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers)/DBS (Disclosure and Barring Service). (2014b). Quality Assurance Framework: An Applicant’s Introduction to the Decision-Making Process for Enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service Checks. Standards and Compliance Unit. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/295392/DBS_Applicant_s_introduction_to_QAF_March_2014.pdf. Accessed 4 February 2019.
  3. Bushway, S. D., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Bickland, A. (2011). The Predictive Value of Criminal Background Checks: Do Age and Criminal History Affect Time to Redemption? Criminology, 49(1), 27–60.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, L. (2013). Criminal Labels, the European Convention on Human Rights and the Presumption of Innocence. Modern Law Review, 76(4), 681–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CRB (Criminal Records Bureau). (2001). Code of Practice for Registered Persons and Other Recipients of Disclosure Information. Liverpool.Google Scholar
  6. Doward, J. (2017, November 25). ‘Irrelevant’ Criminal Record Checks Harm Ex-offenders’ Job Hopes. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  7. Fletcher, D., Taylor, A., Hughes, S., & Breeze, J. (2001). Recruiting and Employing Offenders. Joseph Rowntree Foundation/York Publishing Services.Google Scholar
  8. Home Office. (1991). National Collection of Criminal Records: Report of an Efficiency Scrutiny. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  9. Home Office. (1996, June). On the Record: The Governments Proposals for Access to Criminal Records for Employment and Related Purposes in England and Wales (Cm. 3308). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  10. Home Office. (2015, November). Revised Code of Practice for Disclosure and Barring Service Registered Persons. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/474742/Code_of_Practice_for_Disclosure_and_Barring_Service_Nov_15.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2019.
  11. Home Office. (2015). Statutory Disclosure Guidance (2nd ed.). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  12. House of Commons. (2004, June 22). The Bichard Inquiry Report (HC653). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  13. House of Commons. (2017, January). Criminal Records Disclosure: Non-filterable Offences. Law Commission (HC971). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  14. Mason, S. (2010). A Balanced Approach: Safeguarding the Public Through Fair and Proportionate Use of Accurate Criminal Record Information. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  15. Mason, S. (2011a). A Common Sense Approach: A Review of the Criminal Records Regime in England and Wales—Report on Phase 1. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  16. Mason, S. (2011b). A Common Sense Approach: A Review of the Criminal Records Regime in England and Wales—Report on Phase 2. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  17. Mason, S. (2011c). Review of the Northern Ireland Criminal Records Regime.Google Scholar
  18. Mason, S. (2011d). Filtering of Old and Minor Offending from Criminal Record Bureau Disclosures.Google Scholar
  19. NACRO. (2018, June). Nacro Position Statement: Filtering and the Criminal Records Regime. Available at https://3bx16p38bchl32s0e12di03h-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Nacro-position-statement-on-filtering.pdf. Accessed 5 may 2019.
  20. NAO (National Audit Office). (2018, February 1). Investigation into the Disclosure and Barring Service. Session 2017–19 (HC715). London.Google Scholar
  21. Noble, A. (2016). We Know What You Did Last Summer, and 30 Years Ago: Criminal Records Disclosure and State Regulatory Discretion. Journal of Information Rights, Policy and Practice, 1(1). https://jirpp.winchesteruniversitypress.org/articles/abstract/10.21039/irpandp.v1i1.22/.
  22. Skills for Care. (2018). Safe and Fair Recruitment: A Guide to Employing People with Convictions in Social Care. Available at https://www.skillsforcare.org.uk/Documents/Recruitment-and-retention/Recruiting-for-potential/Safe-and-fair-recruitment.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2019.
  23. Smith, J. M. (1999). Prior Criminality and Employment of Social Workers with Substantial Access to Children: A Decision Board Analysis. British Journal of Social Work, 29(1), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Soothill, K., & Francis, B. (2009). When Do Ex-offenders Become Like Non-offenders? The Howard Journal, 48(4), 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Unell, J. (1992). Criminal Checks Within the Voluntary Sector: An Evaluation of the pilot Schemes’. London: The Volunteer Centre, UK.Google Scholar
  26. UNLOCK. (2010, February). Briefing Paper on the Criminal Records Bureau: UNLOCKing Employment. Kent. Available at http://www.unlock.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/UNLOCK-Briefing-Paper-on-the-Criminal-Records-Bureau.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2019.
  27. von Hirsch, A., & Wasik, M. (1997). Civil Disqualifications Attending Conviction: A Suggested Conceptual Framework. Cambridge Law Review, 53(3), 599–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terry Thomas
    • 1
  • Kevin Bennett
    • 2
  1. 1.Leeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK
  2. 2.University of SunderlandSunderlandUK

Personalised recommendations