Animal Health Policy

  • Coen van Wagenberg
  • Willy Baltussen
  • Roel JongeneelEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies book series (PABEP)


The EU remains under threat of communicable diseases of livestock that may have a severe economic impact or that are of public health significance or both. Such diseases may be introduced and spread by the trading of animals and their products. Measures in line with international agreements are required to prevent the introduction of disease, to control its spread and to protect animal and human health, and to provide safe, wholesome food for European consumers. The EU’s Animal Health Strategy 2013–2017, the Common Financial Framework and the Animal Health Law contributed to the recent update of the EU’s animal health policy. Although the EU’s animal health policy is evaluated to be clearly effective, its cost-effectiveness (efficiency) is difficult to determine.


  1. Bergevoet, R.H., G. van Schaik, J. Veling, G.B. Backus, and P. Franken. 2009. Economic and Epidemiological Evaluation of Salmonella Control in Dutch Dairy Herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 89 (1–2): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boardman, A.E., D.H. Greenberg, A.R. Vining, and D.L. Weimer. 2014. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  3. Brazier, J., J. Ratcliffe, A. Tsuchiya, and J. Salomon. 2007. Measuring an Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brent, R.J. 2003. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Health Care Evaluations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, D.J., and M.R. Reynolds. 2008. Interpreting the Results of Cost-Effectiveness Studies. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 52 (25): 2119–2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Court of Auditors. 2004. Special Report No 8/2004. Official Journal of the European Union. Special Report. OJ 2005/C 54/01.Google Scholar
  7. Detsky, A.S., and I.G. Nagly. 1990. A Clinician’s Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine 113: 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ECA. 2016. Eradication, Control and Monitoring Programmes to Contain Animal Diseases (Special Report). Luxembourg: European Union.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. 2007. A New Animal Health Strategy for the European Union (2007–2013) Where Prevention Is Better Than Cure. Brussels: European Commission, Communication COM 539 (2007).
  10. ———. 2008. Action Plan for the Implementation of the EU Animal Health Strategy. Brussels: European Commission, Communication COM 545 (2008), Brussels.
  11. IBF International Consulting, WUR, VetEffecT, and European Commission. 2017. Study on intra-European Union (intra-EU) Animal Health Certification of Certain Live Animals. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN 978-92-79-73525-7,
  12. Martins, S.B., and J. Rushton. 2014. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Adding Value to Assessment of Animal Health, Welfare and Production. Revue scientifique et technique-Office international des épizooties 33 (3): 1–18.Google Scholar
  13. Pettiti, D.B. 2000. Meta-Analysis, Decision-Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis – Methods for Quantitative Synthesis in Medicine. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press. (Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics No. 31).Google Scholar
  14. Siegel, J.E., M.C. Weinstein, L.B. Russell, and M.R. Gold. 1996. Recommendations for Reporting Cost-Effectiveness Analyses. JAMA 276 (16): 1339–1341. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Coen van Wagenberg
    • 1
  • Willy Baltussen
    • 1
  • Roel Jongeneel
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Consumer and Chain UnitWageningen Economic ResearchThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations