Advertisement

What Is and What Is Not a Conflict of Interest in the Sphere of Public Health

  • Miguel Ángel Royo-BordonadaEmail author
  • Fernando García-López
Conference paper

Abstract

A conflict of interest is a set of circumstances or relationships that create the risk that professional judgment or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest. Secondary interests may be internal, meaning limited to the personal sphere, or external, linked to the interests of third parties or institutions. Internal interests are related to individual identity and personality, and tend to be perfectly aligned with the primary professional interest. Therefore, we usually only speak of a conflict of interest when external secondary interests, usually of a financial nature, are opposed to the primary professional interest (preserving the health of the population in the case of public health). In addition, biases due to internal interests are bidirectional and difficult to quantify, while those deriving from financial conflicts of interest are predictable, unidirectional and large-scale. Although they are different phenomena, they are often mixed up with one another to create confusion and divert attention from financial conflicts of interest. In public health, conflicts of interest can arise in the field of research when studies are conducted on the health effects of pharmaceuticals, chemicals, tobacco, alcohol or food and in decision-making regarding policies related to these same products. In this chapter we present several examples of conflicts of interest in public health and a series of recommendations for their management, beyond their public declaration, which is necessary but insufficient. All public health organizations should adopt standards to avoid, detect, eliminate or minimize the impact of conflicts of interest and ensure that these are put into practice.

Keywords

Conflict of interest Ethics Public health Public health policies Research 

Notes

Disclaimer

This is an independent research, and the opinions expressed are those of the authors and not those of the Institute of Health Carlos III.

References

  1. Acheson, D. (1988). Public health in England. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  2. Agencia Española de Seguridad Alimentaria. (2005). Estrategia NAOS. Agencia Española de Seguridad Alimentaria. Accessed January 12, 2018, from http://www.aecosan.msssi.gob.es/AECOSAN/docs/documentos/nutricion/estrategianaos.pdf
  3. American Psychological Association. (2009). Task force on appropriate therapeutic responses to sexual orientation. Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation. Accessed December 20, 2017, from https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/therapeutic-response.pdf
  4. Barnes, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (1998). Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(19), 1566–1570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bero, L. (2013). Industry sponsorship and research outcome: A Cochrane review. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine, 173(7), 580–581.Google Scholar
  6. Bero, L. A., & Grundy, Q. (2016). Why having a (nonfinancial) interest is not a conflict of interest. PLoS Biology, 14(12), e2001221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bes-Rastrollo, M., Schulze, M. B., Ruiz-Canela, M., & Martínez-González, M. A. (2013). Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: A systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine, 10(12), e1001578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brownell, K., & Warner, K. E. (2009). The perils of ignoring history: Big tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is big food? Milbank Quarterly, 87, 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cappola, A. R., & FitzGerald, G. A. (2015). Confluence, not conflict of interest: Name change necessary. Journal of the American Medical Association, 314(17), 1791–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, D., & Carter, P. (2010). Conflicts of interest. WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”. British Medical Journal, 340, c2912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cope, M. B., & Allison, D. B. (2010). White hat bias: Examples of its presence in obesity research and a call for renewed commitment to faithfulness in research reporting. International Journal of Obesity (London), 34(1), 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crowe-White, K., O’Neil, C. E., Parrott, J. S., Benson-Davies, S., Droke, E., Gutschall, M., et al. (2016). Impact of 100% fruit juice consumption on diet and weight status of children: An evidence-based review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56(5), 871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dana, J., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(2), 252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Eric, E. C., Grady, E. H., et al. (2017, April 13). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Available at SSRN. Accessed January 12, 2018, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2952510
  15. Doshi, P. (2009). Calibrated response to emerging infections. British Medical Journal, 339, b3471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drazen, J. M. (2015). Revisiting the commercial-academic interface. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(19), 1853–1854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dwan, K., Gamble, C., Williamson, P. R., Kirkham, J. J., & Reporting Bias Group. (2013). Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias – An updated review. PLoS One, 8(7), e66844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fineberg, H. V. (2017). Conflict of interest: Why does it matter? Journal of the American Medical Association, 317(17), 1717–1718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flynn, P. (2010). Social, Health and Family Affairs Committee, Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. The handling of the H1N1 pandemic: More transparency needed. AS/Soc, 12. Accessed January 8, 2018, from http://assembly.coe.int/CommitteeDocs/2010/20100329_MemorandumPandemie_E.pdf
  20. Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J., & Motyl, M. (2017). Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another’s opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galea, S., & Saitz, R. (2017). Funding, institutional conflicts of interest, and schools of public health: Realities and solutions. Journal of the American Medical Association, 317(17), 1735–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. George, B. J., Beasley, T. M., Brown, A. W., Dawson, J., Dimova, R., Divers, J., et al. (2016). Common scientific and statistical errors in obesity research. Obesity (Silver Spring), 24(4), 781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Godlee, F. (2010). Conflicts of interest and pandemic flu. British Medical Journal, 340, c2947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. González-Rubio, R., Escortell-Mayor, E., & Del Cura González I. (2017). The pharmaceutical industry and specialised medical training: Residents’ perceptions in Madrid, Spain. Gac Sanit.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.07.015.
  25. Gupta, A., Holla, R., & Suri, S. (2015). Conflict of interest in public health: Should there be a law to prevent it? Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 12(3), 172–177.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, D., & Patrick, M. (2011, June 21). Is ‘Big Food’s’ big money influencing the science of nutrition? ABC NEWS. Accessed January 12 2018, from http://abcnews.go.com/US/big-food-money-accused-influencing-science/story?id=13845186
  27. Hernandez-Aguado, I., & Zaragoza, G. A. (2016). Support of public-private partnerships in health promotion and conflicts of interest. British Medical Journal Open, 6(4), e009342.Google Scholar
  28. Howard, F. (1993). Rules and governance in the public sector: The case of civil service. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 990–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Institute of Medicine. (2009). Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ioannidis, J. P. (2014). More than a billion people taking statins?: Potential implications of the new cardiovascular guidelines. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311(5), 463–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jefferson, T., Jones, M., Doshi, P., Spencer, E. A., Onakpoya, I., & Heneghan, C. J. (2014). Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: Systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments. British Medical Journal, 348, g2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keller, A., & Bucher Della Torre, S. (2015). Sugar-sweetened beverages and obesity among children and adolescents: A review of systematic literature reviews. Childhood Obesity, 11(4), 338–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed. enlarged). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., & Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(10), 1092–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Larkin, I., & Loewenstein, G. (2017). Business model-related conflict of interests in medicine: Problems and potential solutions. Journal of the American Medical Association, 317(17), 1745–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lenzer, J. (2013). Half of panelists on controversial new cholesterol guideline have current or recent ties to drug manufacturers. British Medical Journal, 347, f6989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lenzer, J. (2016). When is a point of view a conflict of interest? British Medical Journal, 355, i6194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loewenstein, G., Sah, S., & Cain, D. M. (2012). The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307(7), 669–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malik, V. S., Willett, W. C., & Hu, F. B. (2009). Sugar-sweetened beverages and BMI in children and adolescents: Reanalyses of a meta-analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(1), 438–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Massougbodji, J., Le, B. Y., Fratu, R., & De, W. P. (2014). Reviews examining sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight: Correlates of their quality and conclusions. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99(5), 1096–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mindell, J. S., Reynolds, L., Cohen, D. L., & McKee, M. (2012). All in this together: The corporate capture of public health. British Medical Journal, 345, e8082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neira, M., & de Onis, M. (2005). Preventing obesity: A public health priority in Spain. Lancet, 365(9468), 1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neira, M., & de Onis, M. (2006). The Spanish strategy for nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of obesity. The British Journal of Nutrition, 96(Suppl 1), S8–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Raymond, N. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises review of general. Psychology, 2(2), 175–220.Google Scholar
  46. Relman, A. S. (1980). The new medical-industrial complex. The New England Journal of Medicine, 303(17), 963–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Relman, A. S. (1984). Dealing with conflicts of interest. The New England Journal of Medicine, 310(18), 1182–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenbaum, L. (2015a). Understanding bias—the case for careful study. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(20), 1959–1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenbaum, L. (2015b). Conflicts of interest: Part 1: Reconnecting the dots – Reinterpreting industry-physician relations. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(19), 1860–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosenbaum, L. (2015c). Beyond moral outrage – Weighing the trade-offs of COI regulation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(21), 2064–2068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Royo-Bordonada, M. A. (2014). The Spanish experience of public-private partnerships with the drinks and food industries. British Medical Journal, 348, g1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Royo-Bordonada, M. Á. (2016). Setting up childhood obesity policies in Europe. The Lancet, 388, 2475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Royo-Bordonada, M. Á. (2017). Desafíos de las políticas nutricionales en España: de la responsabilidad individual a la responsabilidad colectiva. La Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética, 21(Suppl. 1), 56–58.Google Scholar
  54. Royo-Bordonada, M. Á., & Román-Maestre, B. (2015). Towards public health ethics. Public Health Reviews, 36, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruanpeng, D., Thongprayoon, C., Cheungpasitporn, W., & Harindhanavudhi, T. (2017). Sugar and artificially sweetened beverages linked to obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. QJM, 110(8), 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saver, R. S. (2012). Is it really all about the money? Reconsidering non-financial interests in medical research. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 40(3), 467–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schopenhauer. (2014). Parerga and paralipomena. Short philosophical essays (Vol. I). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Serra Majem, L. (2016). Conflictos de interés en la investigación en nutrición: ¿mucho ruido o muchas nueces? Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud, S121–S128.Google Scholar
  59. Shaw, D. M., Morfeld, P., & Erren, T. C. (2016). Conflict or confluence of interest? Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(16), 1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shawwa, K., Kallas, R., Koujanian, S., Agarwal, A., Neumann, I., Alexander, P., et al. (2016). Requirements of clinical journals for authors’ disclosure of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest: A cross sectional study. PLoS One, 11(3), e0152301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stead, W. W. (2017). The complex and multifaceted aspects of conflicts of interest. Journal of the American Medical Association, 317(17), 1765–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Steinbrook, R., Kassirer, J. P., & Angell, M. (2015). Justifying conflicts of interest in medical journals: A very bad idea. British Medical Journal, 350, h2942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Steinman, M. A., Shlipak, M. G., & McPhee, S. J. (2001). Of principles and pens: Attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions. The American Journal of Medicine, 110, 551–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thompson, D. F. (1993). Understanding financial conflicts of interest. The New England Journal of Medicine, 329(8), 573–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Trumbo, P. R., & Rivers, C. R. (2014). Systematic review of the evidence for an association between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and risk of obesity. Nutrition Reviews, 72(9), 566–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vartanian, L. R., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K. D. (2007). Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 97(4), 667–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vineis, P., & Saracci, R. (2015). Conflicts of interest matter and awareness is needed. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 69(10), 1018–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. World Health Organization. (2016). Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. Geneva: WHO. Accessed January 12, 2018, from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204176/1/9789241510066_eng.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel Ángel Royo-Bordonada
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fernando García-López
    • 2
  1. 1.Spanish National School of Public HealthInstitute of Health Carlos IIIMadridSpain
  2. 2.National Centre of EpidemiologyInstitute of Health Carlos IIIMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations