Advertisement

Doping: Which Economic Crime in Sport?

  • Wladimir Andreff
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Pivots in Sports Economics book series (PAPISE)

Abstract

The definition of doping is a tricky issue on which depends whether it is a prohibited—therefore criminal—activity (as with the WADA negative list) or not. This chapter takes a snapshot view of empirical evidence about detected doping (the tip of an iceberg) in different sports and different countries, relying on WADA tested samples and further revealed occurrences of doping. A guesstimate of the global market for performance-enhancing drugs is presented. It is exhibited how unobservable doping distorts observed sporting outcomes in particular with a natural experiment pertaining to Sochi Winter Games. The impact of doping on fans, TV viewers, and sponsors is sketched. Standard economics of crime is at bay once again. Game theory treats doping as a dominant strategy, and provides a more interesting and relevant framework for analysing doping in sport as a prisoner’s dilemma.

Keywords

Doping Economics of crime WADA Blood sample testing Performance-enhancing drugs Distorted sporting outcomes Game theory Dominant strategy Prisoner’s dilemma 

References

  1. Andreff, W. (1985). Le muscle et la machine. Culture Technique, 13, 38–61.Google Scholar
  2. Andreff, W. (2013). Economic development as major determinant of Olympic medal wins: Predicting performances of Russian and Chinese teams at Sochi Games. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 6(4), 314–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreff, W. (2015). The Tour de France: A success story in spite of competitive imbalance and doping. In D. Van Reeth & D. J. Larson (Eds.), The Economics of Professional Road Cycling (pp. 233–255). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Andreff, M., Andreff, W., & Poupaux, S. (2008). Les déterminants économiques de la performance sportive: Prévision des médailles gagnées aux Jeux de Pékin. Revue d’Economie Politique, 118(2), 135–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berentsen, A. (2002). The economics of doping. European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berentsen, A., Bruegger, E., & Loertscher, S. (2008). On cheating, doping and whistle-blowing. European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bird, E. J., & Wagner, G. (1997). Sport as a common property resource: A solution to the dilemmas of doping. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 749–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourg, J.-F. (1999). Contribution à une analyse économique du dopage (IASE Conference Papers 9915). International Association of Sports Economists.Google Scholar
  9. Bourg, J.-F. (2016). Dopage et mondialisation financière du sport: ce que nous apprend l’analyse économique. Drogues, santé et société, 15(1), 66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourg, J.-F., & Gouguet, J.-J. (2010). The Political Economy of Professional Sport. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourg, J.-F., & Gouguet, J.-J. (2012). Economie du sport, col. Repères (3rd ed.). Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  12. Bourg, J.-F., & Gouguet, J.-J. (2017). La société dopée: Peut-on lutter contre le dopage sportif dans une société de marché? Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  13. Breivik, G. (1992). Doping games: A game theoretical exploration of doping. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 27, 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buechel, B., Emrich, E., & Pohlkamp, S. (2016). Nobody’s innocent: The role of customers in the doping dilemma. Journal of Sports Economics, 17(8), 767–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cisyk, J., & Courty, P. (2017). Do fans care about compliance to doping regulations in sports? The impact of PED suspension in baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 18(4), 323–350.Google Scholar
  16. Connor, J. M. N., & Mazanov, J. (2009). Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(11), 871–872.Google Scholar
  17. Daumann, F. (2018). Doping in high-performance sport—The economic perspective. In M. Breuer & D. Forrest (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook on the Economics of Manipulation in Professional Sports (pp. 71–90). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Dilger, A., Frick, B., & Tolsdorf, F. (2007). Are athletes doped? Some theoretical arguments and empirical evidence. Contemporary Economic Policy, 25(4), 604–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Donati, A. (2007). World Traffic in Doping Substances. Montreal: World Anti-Doping Agency.Google Scholar
  20. Dryden, N. (2006). For power and glory: State-sponsored doping and athletes’ human rights. Sports Lawyers Journal, 13(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
  21. Eber, N. (2008a). Le dilemme du sportif. Revue d’Economie Politique, 118(2), 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eber, N. (2008b). The performance-enhancing drug game reconsidered: A fair play approach. Journal of Sports Economics, 9(3), 318–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eber, N., & Thépot, J. (1999). Doping in sport and competition design. Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 65(4), 435–445.Google Scholar
  24. Frick, B. (2008). The doping trap: Why negative lists and random testing don’t work. In P. Rodriguez, S. Késenne, & J. Garcia (Eds.), Threats to Sports and Sports Participation (pp. 41–59). Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
  25. Hanstad, D. V. (2008). Drug scandal and organizational change within the International Ski Federation: A figurational approach. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8(4), 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haugen, K. (2004). The performance-enhancing drug game. Journal of Sports Economics, 5(1), 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirschmann, D. (2017). May increasing doping sanctions discourage entry to the competition. Journal of Sports Economics, 18(7), 720–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Houlihan, B. (2002). Dying to Win: Doping in Sport and the Development of Anti-doping Policy. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Kirstein, R. (2014). Doping, the inspection game, and Bayesian enforcement. Journal of Sports Economics, 15(4), 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maennig, W. (2005). Corruption in international sports and sport management: Forms, tendencies, extent and countermeasures. European Sport Management Quarterly, 5(2), 187–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McLaren, R. H. (2016). The Independent Person Report to the President of WADA. Montreal: WADA.Google Scholar
  32. Mondenard, J.-P., & Garcia, D. (2009). La grande imposture. Paris: Hugo & Co.Google Scholar
  33. Riordan, J. (1993). Soviet-style sport in Eastern Europe: The end of an era. In I. Allison (Ed.), The Changing Policies of Sport (pp. 37–57). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rogge, N., Van Reeth, D., & Van Puyenbroeck, T. (2013). Performance evaluation of Tour de France cycling teams using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Sport Finance, 8(3), 236–257.Google Scholar
  35. Simson, V., & Jennings, A. (1992). The Lords of the Rings: Power, Money and Drugs in the Modern Olympics. North York: Stoddart.Google Scholar
  36. Sjöqvist, F., Garle, M., & Rane, A. (2008). Use of doping agents, particularly anabolic steroids, in sports and society. Lancet, 371(9627), 1872–1882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Solberg, H. A., Hanstad, D. V., & Thoring, T. A. (2010). Doping in elite sport—do the fans care? Public opinion on the consequences of doping scandals. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 11(3), 185–199.Google Scholar
  38. Stray-Gundersen, J., Videman, T., Pentilla, I., & Lereim, I. (2003). Abnormal hematologic profiles in elite cross-country skiers: Blood doping or? Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 13, 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Torgler, B. (2007). “La Grande Boucle”: Determinants of success in the Tour de France. Journal of Sports Economics, 8(3), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. UNODC. (2017). World Drug Report. Vienna: United Nations Office and Drugs and Crime.Google Scholar
  41. Van Reeth, D. (2013). TV demand for the Tour de France: The importance of stage characteristics versus outcome uncertainty, patriotism, and doping. International Journal of Sport Finance, 8(1), 39–60.Google Scholar
  42. Van Reeth, D., & Lagae, W. (2012). Public Opinion on Doping in Cycling: How Cycling Interest, Cycling Activity and Doping Knowledge Matter. Paris: Séminaire DESport, CNOSF.Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, J. K., & Pomfret, R. (2014). Public Policy and Professional Sports: International and Australian Experiences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yonnet, P. (1988). Systèmes des sports. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wladimir Andreff
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre d’Economie de la SorbonneUniversity Paris 1 Panthéon-SorbonneParisFrance

Personalised recommendations