Advertisement

Lutheranism and Confucianism Between National Education and Globalization: A Theoretical Discussion

  • Mette BuchardtEmail author
  • Xiangyun Du
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies on Chinese Education in a Global Perspective book series (CEGP)

Abstract

Lutheran Christianity and Confucian Philosophy share a premise: As schools of thoughts and systems of mentality, they seek to teach respect of governing authorities, while at the same time teaching personal moral and work ethics. In Nordic states such as Denmark, as well as in the People’s Republic of China, respectively Lutheran Christianity and Confucian Philosophy as systems of mentality have played a central role in the development of educational bodies and national education systems. The question is, however, which role and to which extent and not least: What are the preconditions for exploring this role? This chapter explores and discusses how such phenomena which are often characterized as religious can form part of comparative educational analysis. Examining the presence of Christian-Lutheran and Confucian heritages and pasts in recent educational politics, the chapter discusses the theoretical history of such ideas, more specifically how twentieth century sociology and organizational theory have dealt with the two phenomena in question, namely to understand them as part of economy and development rather than as religions. From that basis, the chapter provides examples of how Lutheranism and Confucianism were used in nation-state building in the two countries in the late nineteenth century. In light of this the chapter concludes that an exploration of the significance of the two systems in question should be aware of their role, not as religious systems, but as national answers to the challenges of economic and cultural globalization.

References

  1. Adair-Toteff, C. (2014). Max Weber on Confucianism versus Protestantism. Max Weber Studies, 14(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baader, M. S. (2005). Erziehung als Erlösung. Transformation des Religiösen in der Reformpädagogik. Weinheim/München: Juventa Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, B. (1990). Social construction of pedagogic discourse. In B. Bernstein (Ed.), Class, codes and control. The structuring of pedagogic discourse (pp. 165–218). London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogising knowledge: Studies in recontextualising. In B. Bernstein (Ed.), Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Theory, research, critique (pp. 41–63). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Billioud, S., & Thoraval, J. (2014). The sage and the people. The Confucian revival in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Borevskaya, N. Y. (2001). Searching for individuality. Educational pursuit in China and Russia. In G. Peterson, R. Hayhoe, & Y. Lu (Eds.), Education, culture, and identity in twentieth-century China (pp. 31–53). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buchardt, M. (2011). How did ‘the Muslim pupil’ become Muslim? Danish state schooling and “the Migrant Pupils” since the1970s. In J. S. Nielsen (Ed.), Islam in Denmark: The challenge of diversity (pp. 115–142). Lanham/Boulder/New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  8. Buchardt, M. (2013a). Pedagogical transformations of ‘religion’ into ‘culture’ in Danish state mass schooling from the 1900s to 1930s. Paedagogica Historica: International Journal of the History of Education, 49, 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchardt, M. (2013b). Religion, education and social cohesion: Transformed and traveling Lutheranism in the emerging Nordic welfare states 1890s–1930s. In M. Buchardt, P. Markkola, & H. Valtonen (Eds.), Education, state and citizenship. A perspective in the Nordic welfare state history (NordWel studies in historical welfare state research, vol. 4) (pp. 81–113). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  10. Buchardt, M. (2015). Cultural protestantism and Nordic religious education: An incision in the historical layers behind the Nordic welfare state model. Nordidatica, 2, 131–165.Google Scholar
  11. Buchardt, M. (2016). Religion and modern educational aspirations. In M. A. Peters & D. Tröhler (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_2-1
  12. Buchardt, M. (2017). Lutheranism and the Nordic states. In U. Puschner & R. Faber (Eds.), Luther in Geschichte und Gegenwart [Zivilisation und Geschichte – Civilizations and History] (pp. 285–295). Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Buchardt, M., Markkola, P., & Valtonen, H. (2013). Education and the making of the Nordic welfare states. In M. Buchardt, P. Markkola, & H. Valtonen (Eds.), Education, state and citizenship. A perspective in the Nordic welfare state history (NordWel studies in historical welfare state research, 4) (pp. 7–30). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  14. Buchardt, M., & Plum, M. (forthcoming). Nordic Education as schooling for ‘life’ between two ‘Sputnik shocks’: How ‘Other States’ served as argument in the quest for ‘Real Life Outside School’ in Danish Educational Reforms from the 1950s onwards. In H. Tavares & J. Qi (Eds.), Educational temporalities: Local, national, and global perspectives. Rotterdam/Taipei/Boston: Brill | Sense.Google Scholar
  15. Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state. The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(2), 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng, K. (2012). Confucian societies, education in. In J. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity in education (pp. 440–442). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Du, X. Y., Liu, Q., Toft, E., & Sun, B. Z. (2010). Comparing and rethinking the diversity of PBL models in medical education. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 30(6), 958–960.Google Scholar
  18. Du, X. Y., Su, L. Y., & Liu, J. L. (2013). Developing sustainability curricula using the PBL method in a Chinese context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61(15), 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DuBois, T. D. (2011). Religion and the making of Modern East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  21. Gruzinski, S. (2002). The Mestizo mind: The intellectual dynamics of colonization and globalization = La pensée Métisse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hedegaard, E. (2012). Uddannelsespolitik og globalisering: Uddannelsesreformer i en usikker tidsalder [Education policy and globalization. Education reforms in an uncertain time]. In P. Ø. Andersen & T. Ellegaard (Eds.), Klassisk og moderne pædagogisk teori [Classic and modern education theory]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection. From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Illeris, K. (2014a). Forord [Preface]. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Læring i konkurrencestaten. Kapløb eller bæredygtighed? [Learning in the competition state. Race or sustainability?] (pp. 7–10). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  25. Illeris, K. (Ed.). (2014b). Læring i konkurrencestaten. Kapløb eller bæredygtighed? [Learning in the competition state. Race or sustainability?] (pp. 13–33). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  26. Kahn, H. (1979). World economic development: 1979 and beyond. Hudson Institute, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  27. Kettunen, P. (2011). The transnational construction of national challenges: The ambiguous Nordic model of welfare and competitiveness. In P. Kettunen & K. Petersen (Eds.), Beyond welfare state models. Transnational historical perspectives on social policy (pp. 16–40). Cheltenham, UK/Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kubow, P. K., & Fossum, P. R. (2007). Comparative education. Exploring issues in international context. Upper Saddle River, NJ and Columbus, OH: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, W. O., & Ho, C. H. (2005). Ideological shifts and changes in moral education policy in China. Journal of Moral Education, 34(4), 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehmann, E. (1918a). Religionerne. Kortfattad religionhistoria [The religions. A short history of religions]. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerups Förlag.Google Scholar
  31. Lehmann, E. (1918b). Stedet og Vejen. Et Religionshistorisk Perspektiv [The place and the way. A perspective of history of religion]. Copenhagen: V. Pios Boghandel – Povl Branner.Google Scholar
  32. Li, B. H. (2014). Guanyu dui Daxuesheng Jinxing Guoxue Jiaoyu de Yiyi he Tujing [Impact of Guoxue teaching for university students and its methodology]. Language and Planning, 15, 64–65.Google Scholar
  33. Li, H., & Du, X.-Y. (2013). Confronting cultural challenges when reconstructing the teacher-student relationship in a Chinese context. In M. J. Kirkebæk, D. Xiang-Yun, & A. A. Jensen (Eds.), Teaching and learning culture, negotiating context (pp. 79–94). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li, J., & Hayhoe, R. (2012). Confucianism and higher education. In J. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity in education (pp. 443–445). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Li, P., Zhong, M., & Zhang, H. (2004). Deyu’ as moral education in modern China: Ideological functions and transformations. Journal of Moral Education, 33(4), 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindblad, S., & Popkewitz, T. S. (Eds.). (2004). Educational restructuring: International perspectives on traveling policies. New York: Information Age Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Liu, H. Y. (2014). Qiantan Xiaoxue Guoxue Jiaoyu de Yiyi [Impact of Guoxue teaching in primary schools]. Curriculum and Pedagogy Studies, 7, 45–46.Google Scholar
  38. Markkola, P. (2000). Introduction. The Lutheran context of Nordic women’s history. In P. Markkola (Ed.), Gender and vocation. Women, religion and social change in the Nordic countries, 1830–1940 (pp. 9–25). Helsinki: SKS/FLS. Studia Historica, 64.Google Scholar
  39. Markkola, P. (2011). The Lutheran Nordic welfare states. In P. Kettunen & K. Petersen (Eds.), Beyond welfare state models: Transnational historical perspectives on social policy (pp. 102–118). Cheltenham, UK/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  40. Markkola, P., & Naumann, I. K. (2014). Lutheranism and the Nordic welfare states in comparison. Journal of Church and State, 56(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pedersen, O. K. (2014). Konkurrencestaten og dens uddannelsespolitik. Baggrund, intentioner og funktionsmåder [The competition state and education policy. Background, intentions and functions]. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Læring i konkurrencestaten. Kapløb eller bæredygtighed? [Learning in the competition state. Race or sustainability?] (pp. 13–33). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  42. Plum, M. (2012). The emergence of the analytical method: The scientific effort to produce the learning child for the nation in a global era. QSE. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(5), 645–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Popkewitz, T. S. (2011). From virtue as pursuit of happiness to pursuing the unvirtuous: Republicanism, cosmopolitanism, and reform protestantism in American progressive education. In D. Tröhler et al. (Eds.), Schooling and the making of citizens in the long nineteenth century: Comparative visions (pp. 219–239). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987). The political construction of mass schooling: European origins and worldwide institutionalization. Sociology of Education, 60(1), 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rasmussen, J. (1996). Socialisering og læring i det refleksivt moderne [Socialization and learning in reflexive modern society]. Copenhagen: Unge Pædagoger.Google Scholar
  46. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2000). Globalization and education: Complexities and contingencies. Educational Theory, 50(4), 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schriewer, J. (Ed.). (2000). Discourse formation in comparative education. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  48. Sharpe, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2002). After effectiveness: New directions in the Singapore school system? Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sobe, N. W. (2013). Entanglement and transnationalism in the history of American education. In T. Popkewitz (Ed.), Rethinking the history of education. Transnational perspectives on its questions, methods and knowledge (pp. 93–107). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Stenbæk, J. (1990). To eller tre regimenter i den lutherske kaldsetik? Udvikling og aktualitet i luthersk socialetik [Two or three regimes in the Lutheran ethics of vocation? Development and timeliness in Lutheran social ethics]. Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift, 17, 61–85.Google Scholar
  51. Tay, W. L. (2010). Kang Youwei, the Martin Luther of Confucianism and his vision of Confucian modernity and nation. In H. Masashi (Ed.), Secularization, religion and the state (pp. 97–109). Tokyo: University of Tokyo, Center for Philosophy.Google Scholar
  52. Telhaug, A. O., & Tønnessen, R. T. (1992). Dansk utdanningspolitikk under Bertel Haarder 1982–1992. Nyliberal og nykonservativ skoletænkning [Danish educational politics under Bertel Haarder 1982–1992. Neoliberal and neoconservative school thinking]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  53. Tröhler, D. (2011). Language of education. Protestant legacies, national identities, and global aspirations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Weber, M. ([1915, 1920] 1951). The religion of China. Confucianism and Taoism (H. H. Gerth, Trans.). New York: The Free Press of Glecoe.Google Scholar
  55. Weber, M. (1989). Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen. Konfuzianismus und Taoismus. Schriften 1915–1920 (Herausgegeben von Helwig Schmidt-Glintzer in Zusamenarbeit mit Petra Kolonko). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
  56. Wei, M. Z., & Jiang, G. Y. (2007). Qiantan Dui Xiaoxuesheng Jinxing Guoxue Jiaoyu de Biyaoxing [Importance of Guoxue teaching for school students]. Pedagogy and Teaching, 8, 15–16.Google Scholar
  57. Werner, M., & Zimmermann, B. (2006). Beyond comparison: Histoire Croisée and the challenge of reflexivity. History and Theory, 45, 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yu, T. (2008). The revival of Confucianism in Chinese schools. A historical-political review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(2), 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yuan, Z. (2001). The status of Confucianism in modern Chinese education. A curricular study. In G. Peterson, R. Hayhoe, & Y. Lu (Eds.), Education, culture, and identity in twentieth-century China (pp. 193–213). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  60. Zhang, F. (2011). Qiantan Rujia Sixiang dui Xiandai Jiaoyu de Renwen Qishi [Impact of Confucianism on Chinese contemporary education—An analysis from the perspective of humanities]. Academy, 23, 131–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Education Policy Research, Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  2. 2.College of EducationQatar UniversityDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations