Advertisement

The Effect of Customer Patience on Multiple-Location Inventory Systems

  • Michael Dreyfuss
  • Yahel GiatEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 152)

Abstract

This chapter considers the optimization of spares for various multiple-location inventory systems. The systems’ performance level is the window fill rate, which generalizes the fill rate by taking into account customer patience, that is, that customers may tolerate a certain wait. Formally, the window fill rate of a particular location is the percent of customers that will receive service within the tolerable wait. At the system’s level, the window fill rate is the weighted average of the locations’ window fill rates weighted by the arrival rates to the locations. A near-optimal algorithm that solves the spares allocation problem efficiently (e.g., running time is linear with the number of spares) is described with the conditions for which the solution is optimal. The algorithm’s a priori and a posteriori distances from optimum are decreasing with the system’s size (e.g., number of locations) and therefore it is particularly useful for large scale inventory systems. The chapter concludes with a numerical example that demonstrates that customer patience affects performance and budget profoundly, and neglecting to account for it results with overstocking. Moreover, it is very beneficial to encourage customer patience and, depending on the cost of spares, managers should consider incentives to increase it.

Keywords

Inventory optimization Customer patience Multiple location inventory Greedy optimization Waiting time 

References

  1. 1.
    Caggiano, K., Jackson, L., Muckstadt, A., Rappold, A.: Efficient computation of time-based customer service levels in a multi-item, multi-echelon supply chain: a practical approach for inventory optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199(3), 744–749 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dreyfuss, M., Giat, Y.: Optimizing spare battery allocation in an electric vehicle battery swapping system. In: ICORES, pp. 38–46 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sherbrooke, C.: METRIC: a multi-echelon technique for recoverable item control. Oper. Res. 16(1), 122–141 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Song, J., Yao, D.: Performance analysis and optimization of assemble-to-order systems with random lead times. Oper. Res. 50(5), 889–903 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muckstadt, J.: Analysis and Algorithms for Service Parts Supply Chains. Springer, New York (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larsen, C., Thorstenson, A.: The order and volume fill rates in inventory control systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147(A), 13–19 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Basten, R., van Houtum, G.: System-oriented inventory models for spare parts. Surv. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 19(1), 34–55 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Venkataraman, R.R., Pinto, J.K.: Operations Management: Managing Global Supply Chains. Sage Publications, Los Angleles (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dreyfuss, M., Giat, Y.: Optimal spares allocation to an exchangeable-item repair system with tolerable wait. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 261(2), 584–594 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Heijden, M.C., De Kok, A.G.: Customer waiting times in an (R, S) inventory system with compound Poisson demand. Zeitschrift fuer Oper. Res. 36(4), 315–332 (1992)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tempelmeier, H., Fischer, L.: A procedure for the approximation of the waiting time distribution in a discrete-time (r, S) inventory system. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57(5), 1413–1426 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johansen, S.G.: Emergency orders in the periodic-review inventory system with fixed ordering costs and stochastic lead times for normal orders. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 209, 205–214 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hadley, G., Whitin, T.M.: Analysis of Inventory Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1963)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Disney, S.M., Maltz, A., Wang, X., Warburton, R.D.: Inventory management for stochastic lead times with order crossovers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248(2), 473–486 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dreyfuss, M., Giat, Y.: The window fill rate in a periodic review inventory system with and without order crossover, Jersualem College of Technology, Working paper (2019)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dreyfuss, M., Giat, Y.: Optimal allocation of spares to maximize the window fill rate in a two-echelon exchangeable-item repair system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 270(3), 1053–1062 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Wingerden, E., Tan, T., Van Houtum, G.J.: The impact of an emergency warehouse in a two-echelon spare parts network. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 273(3), 983–997 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen, I., Cohen, M.A., Landau, E.: On sourcing and stocking policies in a two-echelon, multiple location, repairable parts supply chain. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 68(6), 617–629 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Durrande-Moreau, A.: Waiting for service: ten years of empirical research. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 10(2), 171–189 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Katz, K., Larson, B., Larson, R.: Prescriptions for the waiting in line blues: entertain, enlighten and engage. Sloan Manag. Rev. (Winter) 32(2), 44–53 (1991)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smidts, A., Pruyn, A.: How waiting affects customer satisfaction with service: the role of subjective variables. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Research Seminar in Service Management, pp. 678–696 (1994)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Demoulin, N.T., Djelassi, S.: Customer responses to waits for online banking service delivery. Int. J. Retail Dist. Manag. 41(6), 442–460 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Irwin, J.O.: The frequency distribution of the difference between two independent variates following the same Poisson distribution. J. R. Stat. Soc. 100(3), 415–416 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Skellam, J.G.: The frequency distribution of the difference between two Poisson variates belonging to different populations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A (General) 109(Pt 3), 296–296 (1946)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karlis, D., Ntzoufras, I.: Bayesian analysis of the differences of count data. Stat. Med. 25(11), 1885–1905 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karlis, D., Ntzoufras, I.: Bayesian modelling of football outcomes: using the Skellam’s distribution for the goal difference. IMA J. Manag. Math. 20(2), 133–145 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hirakawa, K., Baqai, F., Wolfe, P.J.: Wavelet-based Poisson rate estimation using the Skellam distribution. In: Computational Imaging VII, International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol. 7246, p. 72460R (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jiang, L., Mao, K., Wu, R.: A skellam model to identify differential patterns of gene expression induced by environmental signals. BMC Genomics 15(1), 772 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lien, R.W., Iravani, S.M., Smilowitz, K.R.: Sequential resource allocation for nonprofit operations. Oper. Res. 62(2), 301–317 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Graves, S.C.: A multi-echelon inventory model for a repairable item with one-for-one replenishment. Manag. Sci. 31(10), 1247–1256 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dreyfuss, M., Giat, Y.: Allocating spares to maximize the window fill rate in a periodic review inventory system. Int. J. Prod. Econ. forthcoming 214, 151–162 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Udell, M., Boyd, S.: Maximizing a sum of sigmoids. Stanford University, Working paper (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jerusalem College of TechnologyJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations