Managing Logistics in Collaborative Manufacturing: The Integration Services for an Automotive Application

  • Nicola Mincuzzi
  • Mohammadtaghi FalsafiEmail author
  • Gianfranco E. Modoni
  • Marco Sacco
  • Rosanna Fornasiero
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 568)


The critical success factor of the supply chain management process in a modern manufacturing company consists in the company’s capability to exploit the data produced by a growing number of different sources. The latter include a network of collaborative sensors, digital tools, and services, made available to suppliers and other involved supply chain actors by the recent advancements in digitalization. The collected data can be processed and analyzed in near real time to extract significant information useful for the company to take some relevant decisions. However, these data are typically produced under the form of heterogeneous formats, as they arrive from different types of sources. This is the reason why the real challenge is finding valid solutions that support the data integration. In this regard, this paper investigates the potential of a solution for data integration that allows supporting a set of interacting decision-support tools within the inbound logistics of the automotive manufacturing. This solution is based on a message-oriented middleware which enables a collaborative approach where suppliers, trucks, dock managers and production plants can share information about their own status for the optimization of the overall system.


Inbound logistics Interoperability Data integration Middleware Dock re-scheduling Optimization 



The work on this paper is funded mainly by the European Commission through the DISRUPT project H2020 FOF-11-2016, RIA project n. 723541, 20162018). The authors would like to thank the contributions of the different partners of the DISRUPT project.


  1. 1.
    Bode, C., Wagner, S.M.: Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions. J. Oper. Manag. 36, 215–228 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hofmann, E., Rüsch, M.: Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Comput. Ind. 89, 23–34 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu, F., Xue, L., Sun, C., Zhang, C.: Product transportation distance based supplier selection in sustainable supply chain network. J. Cleaner Prod. 137, 29–39 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Terkaj, W., Tolio, T.: The Italian flagship project: factories of the future. In: Tolio, T., Copani, G., Terkaj, W. (eds.) Factories of the Future, pp. 3–35. Springer, Cham (2019). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Macchion, L., Marchiori, I., Vinelli, A., Fornasiero, R.: Proposing a tool for supply chain configuration: an application to customised production. In: Tolio, T., Copani, G., Terkaj, W. (eds.) Factories of the Future, pp. 217–231. Springer, Cham (2019). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Macchion, L., Fornasiero, R., Danese, P., Vinelli, A.: The effects of personalization on collaborative production networks location. In: Afsarmanesh, H., Camarinha-Matos, L., Lucas Soares, A. (eds.) Collaboration in a Hyperconnected World. PRO-VE 2016. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 480, pp. 433–440. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Fornasiero, R., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative networks as a core enabler of industry 40. In: Camarinha-Matos, L., Afsarmanesh, H., Fornasiero, R. (eds.) Collaboration in a Data-Rich World, PRO-VE 2017. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 506, pp. 3–17. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koçoğlu, İ., İmamoğlu, S.Z., İnce, H., Keskin, H.: The effect of supply chain integration on information sharing: enhancing the supply chain performance. Proc.-Soc. Behav. Sci. 24, 1630–1649 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Modoni, G.E., Doukas, M., Terkaj, W., Sacco, M., Mourtzis, D.: Enhancing factory data integration through the development of an ontology: from the reference models reuse to the semantic conversion of the legacy models. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 30(10), 1043–1059 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar, V., Chibuzo, E.N., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Kumari, A., Rocha-Lona, L., Lopez-Torres, G.C.: The impact of supply chain integration on performance: evidence from the UK food sector. Proc. Manuf. 11, 814–821 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Falsafi, M., Marchiori, I., Fornasiero, R.: Managing disruptions in inbound logistics of the automotive sector. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(11), 376–381 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tountopoulos, V., Kavakli, E., Sakellariou, R.: Towards a cloud-based controller for data-driven service orchestration in smart manufacturing. In: 2018 Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Systems (ES), pp. 96–99. IEEE, October 2018Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Modoni, G.E., Sacco, M., Terkaj, W.: A telemetry-driven approach to simulate data-intensive manufacturing processes. Proc. CIRP 57, 281–285 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Modoni, G.E., Caldarola, E.G., Sacco, M., Terkaj, W.: Synchronizing physical and digital factory: benefits and technical challenges. Proc. CIRP 79, 472–477 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Modoni, G.E., Trombetta, A., Veniero, M., Sacco, M., Mourtzis, D.: An event-driven integrative framework enabling information notification among manufacturing resources. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 32(3), 241–252 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Mincuzzi
    • 1
  • Mohammadtaghi Falsafi
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Gianfranco E. Modoni
    • 1
  • Marco Sacco
    • 3
  • Rosanna Fornasiero
    • 3
  1. 1.STIIMA-CNRBariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.STIIMA-CNRMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations