Advertisement

Comparison Between the Chinese and English Findings

  • Grace ZhangEmail author
  • Vahid Parvaresh
Chapter

Abstract

Drawing on the empirical evidence revealed in previous chapters, this chapter compares the similarities and differences between the Chinese and English findings. In particular, the lexical patterns, contextual influences (impact of the level of competition between the coaches), collaboration versus competition and trends in the manifestation of elasticity are investigated.

References

  1. Aijmer, K. (1984). ‘Sort of’ and ‘kind of’ in English conversation. Studia Linguistica, 38, 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aijmer, K. (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, R. (2003). The grammar of talk: Spoken English, grammar and the classroom. In New perspectives on English in the classroom (pp. 5–13). London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar
  5. Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng, W. (2007). The use of vague language across spoken genres in an intercultural Hong Kong corpus. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 161–181). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holmes, J. (1993). New Zealand women are good to talk to: An analysis of politeness strategies in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 20(2), 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 458–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Suzuki, T. (2008). A corpus-based study of the speech act of “comforting”: Naturalness and appropriateness for English language teaching. Paper presented at the 13th PAAL Conference, University of Hawaii, Manoa, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Zhang, G. (2015). Elastic language: How and why we stretch our words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang, G. (2016). How elastic a little can be and how much a little can do in Chinese. Chinese Language and Discourse, 7(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationCurtin UniversityBentleyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Humanities and Social SciencesAnglia Ruskin UniversityCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations