Teacher Identity in Structural Reflective Workshops: A View from China
There have been mismatches between Chinese traditional educational culture and pedagogical practice in today’s classrooms, as well as between societal needs of students’ autonomy development and the limitations of teacher training in contemporary China. These point to the demand to focus on the development of teacher identity. Previous research has been conducted on the identity formation of student–teachers, yet there have been few efforts to study the identities of Chinese teachers in in-service training. Drawing upon the Dialogical Self Theory (DST), the purpose of this study was to elaborate on identity negotiations by identifying the main I-positions of Chinese teachers in structured reflective workshops. Nine teachers coming from the same school participated in the research. In one academic year, 13 workshops were held, excluding the summer and winter breaks. Data were analyzed using a content analysis approach with constant comparison. The results showed that, first, Chinese experienced teachers were subject to the main tensions between a “controller” I-position and a “partner” I-position. Second, three forms of negotiations between these two I-positions were evident in the workshops, namely, inhibiting the previous I-position, conflicting I-positions, and dialogue between I-positions. The presence of these negotiations indicates that the structured reflective workshops serve as a vehicle to promote the development of experienced teacher identity.
The authors greatly thank Professor Jaan Valsiner for his powerful comments on initial ideas about this work and Editors Pernille Hviid as well as Mariann Märtsin for their helpful works and proofreading for this paper.
This research was partly supported by a grant from Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project of Zhejiang Province (No.: 13NDJC071YB).
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. (M. Holquist, C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Bohm, D. (1985). Unfolding meaning: A weekend of dialogue with David Bohm. In D. Factor, (Ed.) Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Haber, A. (2011). Experiences from a Balint group. Doctoral dissertation, Chestnut Hill College.Google Scholar
- Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Jansen, E. (2001). Dialogical processes and the development of the self. In J. Valsiner & K. Connolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 534–559). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
- Li, X. W., & Wang, X. L. (2015). Cultural evolution and improved children’s school life: A comparative analysis of the survey in fifteen provinces, cities and autonomous regions. Journal of East China Normal University (educational sciences), 3, 97–103.Google Scholar
- Li, Q., Zhang, G. L., & Zhou, J. (2011). The study on sources of occupational stress of primary and secondary school teachers. Psychological Development and Education, 1, 97–103.Google Scholar
- Lü, P., & Yan, F. (2005). Main problems on the current teacher trainings and their Countermeasures. The Inservice Education and Training of school teachers, 11, 10–12.Google Scholar
- Miller Marsh, M. (2002). The social fashioning of teacher identities. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Valsiner, J. (2004). The promoter sign: Developmental transformation within the structure of the dialogicalself. XVIII Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Ghent, July 11–15.Google Scholar
- Winters, A., Meijers, F., Lengelle, R., & Baert, H. (2011). The self in career learning: An evolving dialogue. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Zhou, L. H. (2016). The mechanisms and intervention of learning autonomy among pupils in Grades 3–6. Doctoral dissertation. East China Normal University.Google Scholar
- Zhou, L. H., Li, X. W., & Wu, A. (2012). The adolescent developmental research based on the dynamic systems theory. Journal of East China Normal University (educational sciences), 9(3), 55–59.Google Scholar