Advertisement

Introduction: “The Making of…,” Adaptation and the (Trans-)Cultural Imaginary

  • Jan CroninEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture book series (PSADVC)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the “Making of” genre and its relationship with adaptation and the cultural imaginary. Starting with the relationship between paratextuality and adaptation, Cronin outlines the “Making of” genre as an adaptive spectrum. She argues that how we conceive of artistic adaptation has cultural implications, and asserts the illustrative properties of the study’s “Making of” sites in this regard. Cronin suggests a re-evaluation of the concept of palimpsestuousness and its capacity to highlight the opportunities and pitfalls posed by adaptation as readerly and writerly practice. The chapter then provides an overview of “Making of” sites, how they work and the kinds of cultural work they can perform, before introducing the “Making of” domains explored in this study and the rationale for the book’s design.

References

  1. Arthur, Paul. 2004. “(In)Dispensable Cinema: Confessions of a ‘Making-of’ Addict.” Film Comment 40 (4): 38–42.Google Scholar
  2. Baetens, Jan. 2005. “Novelization, a Contaminated Genre?” Critical Inquiry 32 (1): 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker, Deborah, and Kathryn McKee. 2011. American Cinema and the Southern Imaginary. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, Brian. 2017. “Making Adaptations Studies Adaptive.” In The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies, edited by Thomas Leitch, 587–606. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cartmell, Deborah, and Imelda Whelehan. 2010. Screen Adaptation: Impure Cinema. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Constandinides, Costas. 2013. “Para-Adaptation: Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Convergence Culture.” Adaptation 6 (2): 143–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cronin, Jan. 2017. “Adapting The Quiet Man: John Ford, José Luis Guerín, and the Palimpsest of Place.” Adaptation 10 (1) 2017: 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutchins, Dennis. 2017. “Bakhtin, Intertextuality, and Adaptation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies, edited by Thomas Leitch, 71–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, Gilles. 2006. “What Is the Creative Act?” In Two Regimes of Madness: Texts and Interviews 1975–1995, edited by David Lapoujade, 312–24. Translated by Ames Hodges and Mike Taormina. New York: Semiotexte.Google Scholar
  10. Dicecco, Nico. 2017. “The Aura of Againness: Performing Adaptation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies, edited by Thomas Leitch, 607–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dillon, Sarah. 2005. “Reinscribing De Quincey’s Palimpsest: The Significance of the Palimpsest in Contemporary Literary and Cultural Studies.” Textual Practice 19 (3): 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doyle, Roddy. 2010. The Dead Republic. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Elliott, Kamilla. 2014. “Rethinking Formal-Cultural and Textual-Contextual Divides in Adaptation Studies.” Literature/Film Quarterly 42 (4): 576–93.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2017. “How Do We Talk About Adaptation Studies Today?” Literature/Film Quarterly 45 (2). Accessed June 21, 2019. https://lfq.salisbury.edu/_issues/first/how_do_we_talk_about_adaptation_studies_today.html.
  15. Evans, Nicola Jean. 2010. “Undoing the Magic? DVD Extras and the Pleasure Behind the Scenes.” Continuum 24 (4): 587–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Genette, Gérard. 1997a. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Translated by Channa Newman and Claude Doubinsky. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1997b. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Translated by Jane E. Lewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gillatt, Gary. 1995. “Editor’s Note.” Doctor Who Magazine, October 25, 3.Google Scholar
  19. González Jr., Robert M. 2008. “The Drama of Collaborative Creativity: A Rhetorical Analysis of Hollywood Film Making-of Documentaries.” PhD diss., University of South Florida.Google Scholar
  20. Gray, Jonathan. 2010. Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers, and Other Media Paratexts. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Grossman, Julie. 2015. Literature, Film, and Their Hideous Progeny: Adaptation and ElasTEXTity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haskell, Molly. 2009. Frankly, My Dear: “Gone with the Wind” Revisited. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker’s Apocalypse. 1991. Directed by Fax Bahr and George Hickenlooper. Paramount, 2007. DVD.Google Scholar
  24. Hight, Craig. 2005. “Making-of Documentaries on DVD: The Lord of the Rings Trilogy and Special Editions.” Velvet Light Trap 56 (1): 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hills, Matt. 2002. Fan Cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Hutcheon, Linda. 2013. A Theory of Adaptation. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Jenkins, Henry. 2011. “Aca-fandom and Beyond: Week Two, Part One.” Confessions of an Aca-Fan (blog). Accessed June 21, 2019. http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2011/06/acafandom_and_beyond_week_two.html.
  28. ———. 2017. “Adaptation, Extension, Transmedia.” Literature/Film Quarterly 45 (2). Accessed June 21, 2019. https://lfq.salisbury.edu/_issues/first/adaptation_extension_transmedia.html.
  29. Landsberg, Alison. 2004. Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lev, Peter. 2017. “How to Write Adaptation History.” In The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies, edited by Thomas Leitch, 661–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Longinović, Tomislav Z. 2011. Vampire Nation: Violence as Cultural Imaginary. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loutitt, Chris. 2017. “Behind the Scenes of Austenmania: Andrew Davies, Adaptation and The Making of Pride and Prejudice.” Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance 10 (1): 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moran, Albert, and Michael Keane. 2009. “Introduction: The Global Flow of Creative Ideas.” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 23 (2): 107–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Murphy, Seán. 1995. “Home on the Range.” Film Ireland, August/September, 22–23.Google Scholar
  35. Murray, Simone. 2017. “Three Questions for Adaptation Studies in the Digital Age.” Literature/Film Quarterly 45 (2). Accessed June 21, 2019. https://lfq.salisbury.edu/_issues/first/three_key_questions_for_adaptation_studies_in_the_digital_age.html.
  36. Parody, Clare. 2011. “Franchising/Adaptation.” Adaptation 4 (2): 210–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Robinet, Fabrice. 2018. “Oh for the Days of the Making-of Featurette—Seriously.” New York Times, April 6. Accessed July 1, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/movies/dvd-extras.html.
  38. Sherry, Jamie. 2012. “Paratextual Adaptation: Heart of Darkness as Hearts of Darkness via Apocalypse Now.” In A Companion to Literature, Film, and Adaptation, edited by Deborah Cartmell, 374–90. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Steinhart, Daniel. 2018. “The Making of Hollywood Production: Televising and Visualizing Global Filmmaking in 1960s Promotional Featurettes.” Cinema Journal 57 (4): 96–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tryon, Chuck. 2009. Reinventing Cinema: Movies in the Age of Media Convergence. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wolf, Mark J. P. 2012. Building Imaginary Worlds: The Theory and History of Subcreation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of HumanitiesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations