# The 2-Characters of a Group and the Weak Cayley Table

• Kenneth W. Johnson
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 2233)

## Abstract

Group character theory has many applications, but it is not easy to characterize the information contained in the character table of a group, or give concise information which in addition to that in the character table determines a group. The first part of this chapter examines the extra information which is obtained if the irreducible 2-characters of a group are known. It is shown that this is equivalent to the knowledge of the “weak Cayley table” (WCT) of the group G . A list of properties which are determined by the WCT and not by the character table is obtained, but non-isomorphic groups may have the same WCT. This work gives insight into why the problems in R. Brauer, Representations of finite groups, in “Lectures in Modern Mathematics, Vol. I,” T.L. Saaty (ed.), Wiley, New York, NY, 1963, 133–175, have often been hard to answer.

There is a discussion of the work of Humphries on $$\mathcal {W}(G)$$ the group of weak Cayley table isomorphisms (WCTI’s). This group contains the a subgroup $$\mathcal {W}_{0}(G)$$ generated by Aut(G) and the anti-automorphism g → g−1. $$\mathcal {W}(G)$$ is said to be trivial if $$\mathcal {W}(G)=\mathcal {W}_{0}(G)$$. For some groups, such as the symmetric groups and dihedral groups $$\mathcal {W}(G)$$, is trivial, but there are many examples where $$\mathcal {W}(G)$$ is much larger than $$\mathcal {W}_{0}(G)$$. The discussion is not limited to the finite case.

The category of “weak morphisms” between groups is described. These are weaker than ordinary homomorphisms but preserve more structure than maps which preserve the character table. A crossed product condition on these morphisms is needed to make this category associative. This category has some interesting properties.

## References

1. 30.
R. Brauer, in Representations of Finite Groups, ed. by T.L. Saaty. Lectures in Modern Mathematics, vol. I (Wiley, New York, 1963), pp. 133–175Google Scholar
2. 48.
A.R. Camina, Some conditions which almost characterize Frobenius groups. Israel J. Math. 31, 153–160 (1978)
3. 56.
G.Y. Chen, A new characterization of finite simple groups. Chin. Sci. Bull. 40, 446–450 (1995)
4. 60.
D. Chillag, A. Mann, C.M. Scoppola, Generalized Frobenius groups II. Israel J. Math. 62, 269–282 (1988)
5. 67.
R.H. Crowell, The derived group of a permutation representation. Adv. Math. 53, 99–124 (1984)
6. 70.
E.C. Dade, E, Answer to a question of R. Brauer. J. Algebra 1, 1–4 (1964)
7. 71.
E.C. Dade, M.K. Yadav, Finite groups with many product conjugacy classes. Israel J.Math 154, 29–49 (2006)
8. 78.
J. Dénes, A.D. Keedwell, Latin Squares and Their Applications (Academic, New York, 1974)
9. 151.
S.P. Humphries, Weak Cayley table groups. J. Algebra 216, 135–158 (1999)
10. 152.
S.P. Humphries, K.W. Johnson, Fusions of character tables and Schur rings of abelian groups. Commun. Algebra 36, 1437–1460 (2008)
11. 153.
S.P. Humphries, K.W. Johnson, Fusions of character tables. II. p-groups. Commun. Algebra 37, 4296–4315 (2009)
12. 158.
B. Huppert, Endliche Gruppen. I. Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 134 (Springer, Berlin, 1967)Google Scholar
13. 163.
N. Ito, Lectures on Frobenius and Zassenhaus Groups (University of Illinois at Chicago, 1969)Google Scholar
14. 169.
K.W. Johnson, On the group determinant. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 109, 299–311 (1991)
15. 173.
K.W. Johnson, S.K. Sehgal, The 2-character table is not sufficient to determine a group. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 119, 1021–1027 (1993)
16. 174.
K.W. Johnson, S.K. Sehgal, The 2-characters of a group and the group determinant. Eur. J. Comb. 16, 623–631 (1995)
17. 180.
K.W. Johnson, J.D.H. Smith, On the category of weak Cayley table morphisms between groups. Sel. Math. (N.S.) 13, 57–67 (2007)
18. 184.
K.W. Johnson, S. Mattarei, S.K. Sehgal, Weak Cayley tables. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 61, 395–411 (2000)
19. 193.
W. Kimmerle, On the characterization of finite groups by characters, in The Atlas of Finite Groups: Ten Years on (Birmingham, 1995). London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 249 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), pp. 119–138Google Scholar
20. 194.
W. Kimmerle, K.W. Roggenkamp, Non-isomorphic groups with isomorphic spectral tables and Burnside matrices. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 15, 273–282 (1994)
21. 195.
W. Kimmerle, R. Sandling, Group-theoretic and group ring-theoretic determination of certain Sylow and Hall subgroups and the resolution of a question of R. Brauer. J. Algebra 171, 329–346 (1995)
22. 211.
A. Mann, C.M. Scoppola, On p-groups of Frobenius type. Arch. Math. (Basel) 56, 320–332 (1991)
23. 213.
J. McKay, D. Sibley, Brauer pairs with the same 2-characters. PreprintGoogle Scholar
24. 216.
S. Mattarei, Character tables and metabelian groups. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 46(2), 92–100 (1992)
25. 217.
S. Mattarei, Retrieving information about a group from its character table, Ph.D Thesis, University of Warwick, 1992Google Scholar
26. 218.
S. Mattarei, An example of p-groups with identical character tables and different derived lengths. Arch. Math. 62, 12–20 (1994)
27. 219.
S. Mattarei, Retrieving information about a group from its character degrees or from its class sizes. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 134, 2189–2195 (2006)
28. 264.
J.D.H. Smith, A.B. Romanowska, Post-Modern Algebra (Wiley, New York, 1999)

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

## Authors and Affiliations

• Kenneth W. Johnson
• 1
1. 1.Department of MathematicsPennsylvania State UniversityAbingtonUSA

## Personalised recommendations

### Citechapter 