Advertisement

Chemical Forensics

  • Paula VanninenEmail author
  • Hanna Lignell
  • Harri A. Heikkinen
  • Harri Kiljunen
  • Oscar S. Silva
  • Sini A. Aalto
  • Tiina J. Kauppila
Chapter
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Chemical warfare agents (CWAs) have lately been used in the Syrian Arab Republic, the Republic of Iraq, Malaysia, and the United Kingdom. In the two latter cases, normal investigation by authorities, such as evidence collection and identification of unknown materials found at the crime scenes, was possible. However, in Syria and Iraq the inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) collected evidence in a hostile environment and under tight time constraints. The collected samples were analyzed at the OPCW’s designated laboratories under a strict scope of analysis. The verification protocol for determining the presence or absence of Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) related chemicals includes sample preparation followed by analysis by different chromatographic, spectrometric, and spectroscopic techniques. According to the rules of the OPCW for the sample analyses, the identification is considered unambiguous if two different analytical techniques giving consistent results confirm the presence of the same chemical.

The term “chemical forensics” is defined as an application of chemistry and forensic toxicology in a legal framework. Various research techniques and methods have potential for forensic crime scene investigations related to CWC and alleged use of CWAs. In this review, the forensic information about chemical analyses obtained from the public reports of the OPCW and scientific publications on recent studies related to CWAs, illicit drug profiling, poisons, and incapacitating chemicals, as well as chemical profiling of precursors, impurities, and side products are presented. Finally, the need for recommended operation procedures for attribution analysis for sampling, sample preparation, complementary analytical methods, data analysis, reporting, quality control, and proficiency tests similar to those of CWA analysis from environmental and biomedical samples is discussed.

References

  1. Ariese, F., H. Meuzelaar, M.M. Kerssens, J.B. Buijs, and C. Gooijer. 2009. Picosecond Raman spectroscopy with a fast intensified CCD camera for depth analysis of diffusely scattering media. Analyst 134 (6): 1192–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asadi, Z., M.D. Esrafili, E. Vessally, M. Asnaashariisfahani, S. Yahyaei, and A. Khani. 2017. Structural study of fentanyl by DFT calculations, NMR and IR spectroscopy. Journal of Molecular Structure 1128: 552–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagas, C.K., R.L. Scadding, C.J. Scadding, R.J. Watling, W. Roberts, and S.P.B. Ovenden. 2017. Trace isotope analysis of Ricinus communis seed core for provenance determination by laser ablation-ICP-MS. Forensic Science International 270: 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balayssac, S., E. Retailleau, G. Bertrand, M.P. Escot, R. Martino, M. Malet-Martino, and V. Gilard. 2014. Characterization of heroin samples by H-1 NMR and 2D DOSY H-1 NMR. Forensic Science International 234: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckonert, O., H.C. Keun, T.M.D. Ebbels, J.G. Bundy, E. Holmes, J.C. Lindon, and J.K. Nicholson. 2007. Metabolic profiling, metabolomic and metabonomic procedures for NMR spectroscopy of urine, plasma, serum and tissue extracts. Nature Protocols 2 (11): 2692–2703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beebe, K., R.J. Pell, and M.B. Seasholtz. 1998. Chemometrics: A practical guide. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  7. Benedito, L.E.C., A.O. Maldaner, and A.L. Oliveira. 2018. An external reference 1H qNMR method (PULCON) for characterization of high purity cocaine samples. Analytical Methods 10: 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blachut, D., K. Wojtasiewicz, and Z. Czarnocki. 2002. Identification and synthesis of some contaminants present in 4-methoxyamphetamine (PMA) prepared by the Leuckart method. Forensic Science International 127 (1-2): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campos, A.R., Z. Gao, M.G. Blaber, R. Huang, G.C. Schatz, R.P. Van Duyne, and C.L. Haynes. 2016. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy detection of ricin B chain in human blood. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 120 (37): 20961–20969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen, K.A., and M.D. Morris. 1999. Hyperspectral Raman microscopic imaging using powell lens line illumination. Applied Spectroscopy 52 (9): 1145–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cletus, B., W. Olds, P.M. Fredericks, E. Jaatinen, and E.L. Izake. 2013. Real-time detection of concealed chemical hazards under ambient light conditions using Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Forensic Sciences 58 (4): 1008–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cort, J.R., and H. Cho. 2009. 1H and 13C NMR chemical shift assignments and conformational analysis for the two diastereomers of the vitamin K epoxide reductase inhibitor brodifacoum. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry 47 (10): 897–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doughty, D., B. Painter, P.E. Pigou, and M.R. Johnston. 2016. The synthesis and investigation of impurities found in Clandestine Laboratories: Baeyer-Villiger Route Part I; Synthesis of P2P from benzaldehyde and methyl ethyl ketone. Forensic Science International 263: 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffy, J., A. Urbas, M. Niemitz, K. Lippa, and I. Marginean. 2019. Differentiation of fentanyl analoques by low-field NMR spectroscopy. Analytica Chimica Acta 1049: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Favela, K.H., J.A. Bohmann, and W.S. Williamson. 2012. Dust as a collection media for contaminant source attribution. Forensic Science International 217 (1–3): 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraga, C.G., B.H. Clowers, R.J. Moore, and E.M. Zink. 2010. Signature-Discovery approach for sample matching of a nerve-agent precursor using liquid Chromatography−Mass spectrometry, XCMS, and chemometrics. Analytical Chemistry 82 (10): 4165–4173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraga, C.G., O.T. Farmer, and A.J. Carman. 2011a. Anionic forensic signatures for sample matching of potassium cyanide using high performance ion chromatography and chemometrics. Talanta 83 (4): 1166–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fraga, C.G., G.A. Pérez Acosta, M.D. Crenshaw, K. Wallace, G.M. Mong, and H.A. Colburn. 2011b. Impurity profiling to match a nerve agent to its precursor source for chemical forensics applications. Analytical Chemistry 83 (24): 9564–9572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraga, C.G., L.H. Sego, J.C. Hoggard, G.A.P. Acosta, E.A. Viglino, J.H. Wahl, and R.E. Synovec. 2012. Preliminary effects of real-world factors on the recovery and exploitation of forensic impurity profiles of a nerve-agent simulant from office media. Journal of Chromatography. A 1270: 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fraga, C.G., K. Bronk, B.P. Dockendorff, and A. Heredia-Langner. 2016. Organic chemical attribution signatures for the sourcing of a mustard agent and its starting materials. Analytical Chemistry 88 (10): 5406–5413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fraga, C.G., A.V. Mitroshkov, N.S. Mirjankar, B.P. Dockendorff, and A.M. Melville. 2017. Elemental source attribution signatures for calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) fertilizers used in homemade explosives. Talanta 174: 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fredriksson, S.A., D.S. Wunschel, S.W. Lindstrom, C. Nilsson, K. Wahl, and C. Astot. 2018. A ricin forensic profiling approach based on a complex set of biomarkers. Talanta 186: 628–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garg, P., A. Purohit, V.K. Tak, and D.K. Dubey. 2009. Enhanced detectability of fluorinated derivatives of N,N-dialkylamino alcohols and precursors of nitrogen mustards by gas chromatography coupled to Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis for verification of chemical weapons convention. Journal of Chromatography. A 1216: 7906–7914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Groenewold, G.S., J.R. Scott, E.D. Lee, and S.A. Lammert. 2013. Rapid analysis of organophosphonate compounds recovered from vinyl floor tile using vacuum extraction coupled with a fast-duty cycle GC/MS. Analytical Methods 5 (9): 2227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haddad, A., M.A. Comanescu, O. Green, T.A. Kubic, and J.R. Lombardi. 2018. Detection and quantitation of trace fentanyl in heroin by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry 90 (21): 12678–12685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harvey, S.D., and J.H. Wahl. 2012. On-Matrix derivatization for dynamic headspace sampling of nonvolatile surface residues. Journal of Chromatography. A 1256: 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hays, P.A. 2005. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) methods for determining the purity of reference drug standards and illicit forensic drug seizures. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50 (6): 1342–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. He, L., B. Deen, T. Rodda, I. Ronningen, T. B, C. Haynes, F. Diez-Gonzalez, and T.P. Labuza. 2011. Rapid detection of ricin in milk using immunomagnetic separation combined with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Food Science 76: 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heather, E., R. Shimmon, and A.M. McDonagh. 2015. Organic impurity profiling of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) synthesised from catechol. Forensic Science International 248: 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holmgren, K.H., C.A. Valdez, R. Magnusson, A.K. Vu, S. Lindberg, A.M. Williams, A. Alcaraz, C. Åstot, S. Hok, and R. Norlin. 2018. Part 1: Tracing Russian VX to its synthetic routes by multivariate statistics of chemical attribution signatures. Talanta 186: 586–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hondrogiannis, E., A. Schmidt, F. Iannaconi, and E. Ehrlinger. 2013. Feasibility study into use of elemental impurities of sulfamide for use in characterizing different vendors by inductively coupled Plasma/Mass spectrometry. Forensic Science International 232 (1-3): 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hopkins, R.J., L. Lee, and N.C. Shand. 2017. Correcting transmission losses in short-wave infrared spatially offset Raman spectroscopy measurements to enable reduced fluorescence through-barrier detection. Analyst 142 (19): 3725–3732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Inscore, F., A. Gift, P. Maksymiuk, and S. Farquharson. 2004. Characterization of chemical warfare G-agent hydrolysis products by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chemical and Biological Point Sensors for Homeland Defense II 2004: 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jansson, D., S.W. Lindström, R. Norlin, S. Hok, C.A. Valdez, A.M. Williams, A. Alcaraz, C. Nilsson, and C. Åstot. 2018. Part 2: Forensic attribution profiling of Russian VX in food using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Talanta 186: 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. John, H., M.J. van der Schans, M. Koller, H.E.T. Spruit, F. Worek, H. Thiermann, and D. Noort. 2018. Fatal sarin poisoning in Syria 2013: Forensic verification within an international laboratory network. Forensic Toxicology 36 (1): 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kondo, T., R. Hashimoto, Y. Ohrui, R. Sekioka, T. Nogami, F. Muta, and Y. Seto. 2018. Analysis of chemical warfare agents by portable Raman spectrometer with both 785nm and 1064nm excitation. Forensic Science International 291: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kovacs, H., D. Moskau, and M. Spraul. 2005. Cryogenically cooled probes – A leap in NMR technology. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 46 (2-3): 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kreuzer, H.W., J. Horita, J.J. Moran, B.A. Tomkins, D.B. Janszen, and A. Carman. 2012. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios of sodium and potassium cyanide as a forensic signature. Journal of Forensic Sciences 57 (1): 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, B.M., B. Veriansyah, S.H. Kim, J.D. Kim, and Y.W. Lee. 2005. Total organic carbon disappearance kinetics for supercritical water oxidation of dimethyl methylphospate used as a chemical agent simulant. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 22 (4): 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leonard, J., A. Haddad, O. Green, R.L. Birke, T. Kubic, A. Kocak, and J.R. Lombardi. 2017. SERS, Raman, and DFT analyses of fentanyl and carfentanil: Toward detection of trace samples. Journal of Raman Specroscopy 48 (10): 1323–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu, C., T. Li, Y. Han, Z. Hua, W. Jia, and Z. Qian. 2018. The identification and analytical characterization of 2,2′-difluorofentanyl. Drug Testing and Analysis 10 (4): 774–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Magnusson, R., S. Nyholm, and C. Astot. 2012. Analysis of hydrogen cyanide in air in a case of attempted cyanide poisoning. Forensic Science International 222 (1-3): e7–e12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martyshkin, D.B., R.C. Ahuja, A. Kudriavtsev, and S.B. Mirov. 2004. Effective suppression of fluorescence light in Raman measurements using ultrafast time gated charge coupled device camera. The Review of Scientific Instruments 75 (3): 630–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mayer, B.P., A.J. DeHope, D.A. Mew, P.E. Spackman, and A.M. Williams. 2016. Chemical attribution of fentanyl using multivariate statistical analysis of orthogonal mass spectral data. Analytical Chemistry 88 (8): 4303–4310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mayer, B.P., C.A. Valdez, A.J. DeHope, P.E. Spackman, and A.M. Williams. 2018. Statistical analysis of the chemical attribution signatures of 3-methylfentanyl and its methods of production. Talanta 186: 645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mazzitelli, C.L., M.A. Re, M.A. Reaves, C.A. Acevedo, S.D. Straight, and J.E. Chipuk. 2012. A systematic method for the targeted discovery of chemical attribution signatures: Application to isopropyl bicyclophosphate production. Analytical Chemistry 84 (15): 6661–6671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCain, S.T., R.M. Willett, and D.J. Brady. 2008. Multi-excitation Raman spectroscopy technique for fluorescence rejection. Optics Express 16 (15): 10975–10991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mesilaakso, M., and M. Rautio. 2000. Verification of chemicals related to the chemical weapons convention. In Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry: Applications, theory and instrumentation. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Metaxas, A.E., and J.R. Cort. 2013. Counterion influence on chemical shifts in strychnine salts. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry 51 (5): 292–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mirjankar, N.S., C.G. Fraga, A.J. Carman, and J.J. Moran. 2016. Source attribution of cyanides using anionic impurity profiling, stable isotope ratios, trace elemental analysis and chemometrics. Analytical Chemistry 88 (3): 1827–1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mo, K.-F., A. Heredia-Langner, and C.G. Fraga. 2017. Evaluating and modeling the effects of surface sampling factors on the recovery of organic chemical attribution signatures using the accelerated diffusion sampler and solvent extraction. Talanta 164: 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moran, J.J., H.W. Kreuzer, A.J. Carman, J.H. Wahl, and D.C. Duckworth. 2012. Multiple stable isotope characterization as a forensic tool to distinguish acid scavenger samples. Journal of Forensic Sciences 57 (1): 60–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mott, A.J., and P. Rez. 2012. Calculated infrared spectra of nerve agents and simulants. Spectrochimica Acta. Part A, Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 91: 256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Notingher, I., C. Green, C. Dyer, E. Perkins, N. Hopkins, C. Lindsay, and L.L. Hench. 2004. Discrimination between ricin and sulphur mustard toxicity in vitro using Raman spectroscopy. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 1 (1): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. OPCW – Note by the technical secretariat. 2018. Report of the OPCW fact-finding mission in Syria regarding the incidents in Al-hamadaniyah on 30 October 2016 and in Karm Al-Tarrab on 13 November 2016, S/1642/2018 (2 Jul 2018). Available from https://reliefweb.int/report/syrian-arab-republic/note-technical-secretariat-report-opcw-fact-finding-mission-syria-1.
  56. OPCW – UN Joint Investigative Mechanism. 2016. Third report of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons - United Nations Joint Investigative Mechanism, S/2016/738 (24 Aug 2016). Available from https://undocs.org/S/2016/738.
  57. OPCW - UN Joint Investigative Mechanism. 2017a. “FACT SHEET OPCW – UN JOINT INVESTIGATIVE MECHANISM(Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons-United Nations Joint Investigative Mechanism, June 2017). https://s3.amazonaws.com/unoda-web/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/JIM-Fact-Sheet-Jul2017.pdf.
  58. OPCW - UN Joint Investigative Mechanism. 2017b. Seventh report of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons - United Nations Joint Investigative Mechanism, S/2017/904 (26 Oct 2017). Available from https://undocs.org/S/2017/904.
  59. OPCW/PTS. 1993. Convention on the prohibition of the development, production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons and on their destruction. Signed in January 1993. Printed and Distributed by the OPCW/PTS. The Depositary of this Convention is the Secretary-General of the United Nations, from whom a Certified True Copy can be Obtained.Google Scholar
  60. Ovenden, S.P., E.J. Pigott, S. Rochfort, and D.J. Bourne. 2014. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and chemometric analysis of Ricinus communis extracts for cultivar identification. Phytochemical Analysis 25 (5): 476–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pagano, B., I. Lauri, S. De Tito, G. Persico, M.G. Chini, A. Malmendal, E. Novellino, and A. Randazzo. 2013. Use of NMR in profiling of cocaine seizures. Forensic Science International 231 (1–3): 120–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Petterson, I.E.I., P. Dvorak, J.B. Buijs, C. Gooijer, and F. Ariese. 2010. Time-resolved spatially offset Raman spectroscopy for depth analysis of diffusely scattering layers. Analyst 135 (12): 3255–3259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Picquart, M., E. Nicolas, and F. Lavialle. 1989. Membrane-damaging action of ricin on DPPC and DPPC-cerebrosides assemblies. A Raman and FTIR analysis. European Biophysics Journal 17 (3): 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rautio, M. 1993. Recommended operating procedures for sampling and analysis in the verification of chemical disarmament. Helsinki: The Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.Google Scholar
  65. Rautio, M. 1994. Recommended operation procedures for sampling and analysis in the verification of chemical disarmament. Helsinki: The Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.Google Scholar
  66. Riaz, S., and M.A. Farrukh. 2014. Toxicological analysis of ricin in medicinal castor oil with evaluation of health hazards. Asian Journal of Chemistry 26 (2): 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rodriguez-Saona, L.E., F.S. Fry, and E.M. Calvey. 2000. Use of Fourier transform near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy for rapid quantification of castor bean meal in a selection of flour-based products. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48 (11): 5169–5177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rummel, J.L., J.D. Steill, J. Oomens, C.S. Contreras, W.L. Pearson, J. Szczepanski, D.H. Powell, and J.R. Eyler. 2011. Structural elucidation of direct analysis in real time ionized nerve agent simulants with infrared multiple photon dissociation spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry 83 (11): 4045–4052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Salter, B., J. Owens, R. Hayn, R. McDonald, and E. Shannon. 2009. N-chloramide modified Nomex as a regenerable self-decontaminating material for protection against chemical warfare agents. Journal of Materials Science 44: 2069–2078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scafi, S.H., and C. Pasquini. 2001. Identification of counterfeit drugs using near-infrared spectroscopy. Analyst 126: 2218–2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schenck, F.J., and J.E. Hobbs. 2004. Evaluation of the Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) approach to pesticide residue analysis. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 73 (1): 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schneider, T., and Lütkefend, T.. 2019. Global Public Policy Institute. Nowhere to hide: The logic of chemical weapons use in Syria. Available from https://www.gppi.net/2019/02/17/the-logic-of-chemical-weapons-use-in-syria (accessed Jan 13, 2020).
  73. Strozier, E.D., D.D. Mooney, D.A. Friedenberg, T.P. Klupinski, and C.A. Triplett. 2016. Use of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection and random forest pattern recognition techniques for classifying chemical threat agents and detecting chemical attribution signatures. Analytical Chemistry 88 (14): 7068–7075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tang, J.J., J.F. Sun, R. Lui, Z.M. Zhang, J.F. Liu, and J.W. Xie. 2016. New surface-enhanced Raman sensing chip designed for on-site detection of active ricin in complex matrices based on specific depurination. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 8 (3): 2449–2455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vanninen, P. accepted 2019. Verification of chemicals related to the chemical weapons convention. In Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry: Applications, theory and instrumentation. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  76. Vanninen, P. 2011a. Verification of chemicals related to the chemical weapons convention. In Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry: Applications, theory and instrumentation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  77. Vanninen, P. 2011b. Recommended operating procedures for analysis in the verification of chemical disarmament, 2011 Edition. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  78. Vanninen, P. 2017. Recommended operating procedures for analysis in the verification of chemical disarmament, 2017 Edition. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  79. Volpe, A.M., and M.J. Singleton. 2011. Stable isotopic characterization of ammonium metavanadate (NH4VO3). Forensic Science International 209 (1-3): 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wahl, J.H., and H.A. Colburn. 2010. Extraction of chemical impurities for forensic investigations: A case study for indoor releases of a sarin surrogate. Building and Environment 45 (5): 1339–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wiktelius, D., L. Ahlinder, A. Larsson, K. Hojer Holmgren, R. Norlin, and P.O. Andersson. 2018. On the use of spectra from portable Raman and ATR-IR instruments in synthesis route attribution of a chemical warfare agent by multivariate modeling. Talanta 186: 622–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Williams, A.M., A.K. Vu, B.P. Mayer, S. Hok, C.A. Valdez, and A. Alcaraz. 2018. Part 3: Solid phase extraction of Russian VX and its chemical attribution signatures in food matrices and their detection by GC-MS and LC-MS. Talanta 186: 607–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wu, J., Y. Zhu, J. Gao, J. Chen, J. Feng, L. Guo, and J. Xie. 2017. A simple and sensitive surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic discriminative detection of organophosphorus nerve agents. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 409: 5091–5099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yoder, J.L., P.E. Magnelind, M.A. Espy, and M.T. Janicke. 2018. Exploring the limits of overhauser dynamic nuclear polarization (O-DNP) for portable magnetic resonance detection of low gamma nuclei. Applied Magnetic Resonance 49 (7): 707–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zheng, J.K., C.Y. Zhao, G.F. Tian, and L.L. He. 2017. Rapid screening for ricin toxin on letter papers using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Talanta 162: 552–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Vanninen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hanna Lignell
    • 1
  • Harri A. Heikkinen
    • 1
  • Harri Kiljunen
    • 1
  • Oscar S. Silva
    • 1
  • Sini A. Aalto
    • 1
  • Tiina J. Kauppila
    • 1
  1. 1.VERIFIN, Department of ChemistryUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations