Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Ivan GusicEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

This conclusion combines insights from the analysed of urban conflicts over peace(s) to answer the principal research question. The subsequent argument is that the postwar city reinforces rather than transcends its continuities of war into peace because urban conflicts over peace(s) attack its transcending potential and enhance its destructive potential while the city itself—untouched by postwar contestation—is destructive towards war-to-peace transitions. Yet the chapter also focuses on complementary explanations such as the routinisation of division and the impossibility to combine certain peace(s). It additionally presents an alternative picture of the postwar city by demonstrating that it also transcends its continuities of war in peace. The wider conclusions drawn from this ambiguity is that the postwar city is inherently Janus-faced, that it has a significant transcending potential, that there are no easy solutions to its problems, and that its unique situation necessitates cooperation between peace research and urban studies.

Keywords

Janus-faced city The postwar city Peace research Urban studies Transcending potential Destructive potential 

References

  1. Amin, Ash and Nigel Thrift. 2002. Cities: reimagining the urban. Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Gusic, Ivan. 2019. “The relational spatiality of the postwar condition: a study of the city of Mitrovica”. Political Geography 71: 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jacobs, Jane. 1994. The death and life of great American cities. Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2008. “Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace”. Cooperation and Conflict 43(2): 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Massey, Doreen. 2005. For space. Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The return of the political. Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Sennett, Richard. 1991. The conscience of the eye: the design and social life of cities. Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2008. The uses of disorder: personal identity and city life. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Online Sources, News Articles, Videos, and Datasets

  1. Agencija za statistiku Bosne i Hercegovine. 2016. “Popisa stanovništva, domaćinstava/kućanstava i stanova u Bosni i Hercegovini 2013. godine”. Agencija za statistiku Bosne i Hercegovine.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations