• Lee-Anne Gray


Bullying is a serious and enduring problem in education, an agreed upon fact that seems to resist efforts at improvement. Since 1999, when the Columbine shooting occurred, there has been increasing awareness of the connection between bullying and school/mass shooters. There is an increased effort to disarm schools and students when gun violence arises, however the very efforts may be causing more harm than good. The connections between bullying and LGBTQ+/gender issues are just as serious as the school shootings, because they are resulting in large numbers of deaths. The chapter presents the seriousness and pervasiveness of bullying from diverse perspectives; linking them through the Social Ecology of this moment. Current solutions are evaluated at the end of this chapter, along with Trauma-Accountability strategies to counteract bullying.


  1. Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Fraser, J. M. (2015). Teaching bullies: Zero tolerance on the court or in the classroom. Vancouver, BC: Motion Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fraser, J. M. (2018). Brain scars: Knowing the real truths about neuroscience, bullying, and abuse in order to protect our students (Unpublished manuscript). Victoria.Google Scholar
  4. GLSEN. (2016). The 2015 national school climate survey. New York, NY: GLSEN.Google Scholar
  5. GLSEN. (2018). 2017 national school climate survey (pp. 1–196). New York, NY: GLSEN.
  6. Gray, L. (2018). LGBTQ+ youth: A guided workbook to support sexual orientation and gender identity. Eau Claire, WI: PESI Publishing & Media.Google Scholar
  7. Hinton, E. K. (2016). From the war on poverty to the war on crime: The making of mass incarceration in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kellner, D. (2008). Guys and guns amok domestic terrorism and school shootings from the Oklahoma City bombing to the Virginia Tech massacre. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, J. (2014). Understanding social dynamics and school shootings requires larger context. Commentary on: “Bullying, romantic rejection, and conflicts with teachers: The crucial role of social dynamics in the development of school shootings–a systematic review”. International Journal of Developmental Science, 8(1), 43–47.
  10. Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M., Smith, L., & Phillips, S. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior, 29(3), 202–214. Scholar
  11. Mayo, C. (2014). LGBTQ youth and education: Policies and practices. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Musu, L., Zhang, A., Wang, K., Zhang, J., & Oudekerk, B. A. (2019). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2018 (pp. 2–268, Rep. No. NCES 2019-047 252571). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  13. National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Student reports of bullying: Results from the 2015 school crime supplement to the national crime victimization survey. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  14. Rios, V. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of black and latino boys. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Seifert, K., & Kohl, B. (2012). Youth violence: Theory, prevention, and intervention. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Sommer, F., Leuschner, V., & Scheithauer, H. (2014). Bullying, romantic rejection, and conflicts with teachers: The crucial role of social dynamics in the development of school shootings – a systematic review. International Journal of Developmental Science, 8(1–2), 3–24. Retrieved from
  17. Thomas, P. L., Gorlewski, J. A., Carr, P. R., & Porfilio, B. J. (Eds.). (2015). Pedagogies of kindness and respect: On the lives and education of children. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  18. Vossekuil, B. J., Fein, R. A., Reddy, M., Borrum, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2004). The final report and findings of the safe school initiative: Implications for the prevention of school attacks in the United States (pp. 1–39, United States, United States Secret Service, Department of Education). Washington, DC, CADC: United States Secret Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee-Anne Gray
    • 1
  1. 1.The Connect GroupToluca LakeUSA

Personalised recommendations