Perspectives on an Energy System After a Decline in Fossil Fuel Use: Welcome to the Store-Age

  • Andrew Fredrick Crossland


Since the dawn of the industrial revolution our economies, our development and our psyche have been inherently linked to an addiction to carbon based fuels. Whilst they last, these fossil fuels can be consumed at the time and point of need—a concept called dispatchability. Low carbon sources, whether nuclear or weather dependant are often cited as being non dispatchable and so not always available when needed. Low cost, high density and easily deployable energy storage is one of a suite of technologies which could add the flexibility needed to help match the generation of low carbon energy to consumption. This chapter explores the ways in which energy storage can provide that flexibility. It considers storage in many of its forms, from fast responding batteries through to large pumped storage facilities and electric vehicles. There is a special focus on electricity systems through proposing a future “electrical energy storage mix”. The chapter also provides a critical assessment of energy storage to provide near complete decarbonisation of homes, commercial buildings and islands through a series of case studies. This informs what storage can, and cannot achieve, in the context of abating fossil fuel.


Energy storage Flexibility Low carbon transitions Energy mix Batteries Electric vehicles 


  1. BP Global. 2017. Lightsource and BP Join Forces to Drive Growth in Solar Power Development Worldwide. Press Releases Media BP.
  2. Carrington, D. 2018. Allow Nuclear Waste Disposal Under National Parks, Say MPs. The Guardian.
  3. Chediak, M. 2018. The Battery will Kill Fossil Fuels—It’s Only a Matter of Time. Bloomberg. [Online]
  4. Commonwealth of Nations. 2018. Find Freight, Shipping and Logistics Expertise in Tuvalu.
  5. Crossland, A.F., Anuta, O.H. and Wade, N.S. 2015. A Socio-technical Approach to Increasing the Battery Lifetime of Off-Grid Photovoltaic Systems Applied to a Case Study in Rwanda. Renewable Energy 83: 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crossland, A.F., Jones, D., Wade, N.S. and Walker, S.L. 2018. Comparison of the Location and Rating of Energy Storage for Renewables Integration in Residential Low Voltage Networks with Overvoltage Constraints. Energies 11(8): 2041. Scholar
  7. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). 2018a. Natural Gas Supply and Consumption, 20 December 2018.
  8. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). 2018b. Supply and Consumption of Electricity, 20 December 2018.
  9. European Commission. 2018. Energy Efficiency—European Commission.
  10. Green Tech Media. 2018. Sonnen Raises $71M and Kicks Off a Strategic Partnership with Shell | Greentech Media.
  11. Hinson, S. 2017. Energy Bills and Proposals for Reform Contents: 1. Background 2. Reform of the Energy Market 3. A Price Cap 2 Domestic Energy Bills. London: s.n.Google Scholar
  12. ITP Renewables. 2018. Battery Test Centre Report 4. Canberra: s.n.Google Scholar
  13. Leicester, P., Goodier, C. and Rowley, P. 2015. Evaluating Self-Consumption for Domestic Solar PV: Simulation Using Highly Resolved Generation and Demand Data for Varying Occupant Archetypes. Proceedings of 2015 11th Photovoltaic Science, Applications and Technology Conference (PVSAT-11), Leeds.Google Scholar
  14. Loisel, R., Alexeeva, V., Zucker, A. and Shropshire, D. 2018. Load-Following with Nuclear Power: Market Effects and Welfare Implications. Progress in Nuclear Energy 109: 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacKay, D.J.C. 2009. Sustainable Energy—Without the Hot Air. s.l.: UIT.Google Scholar
  16. Mercer, P. 2007. BBC NEWS Asia-Pacific: Coconut Oil Powers Island’s Cars.
  17. MyGridGB. 2018. MyGridGB.
  18. National Grid. 2016. Enhanced Frequency Response Market Information Report. Warwick: s.n.Google Scholar
  19. Neill, S.P. et al. 2018. Tidal Range Energy Resource and Optimization—Past Perspectives and Future Challenges. Renewable Energy, 127: 763–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Office for National Statistics. 2018. Total Number of Households by Region and Country of the UK, 1996 to 2017—Office for National Statistics.
  21. Ofgem. 2016. Feed-in Tariff About the Scheme and How to Apply. London: s.n.Google Scholar
  22. Orsted. 2017. DONG Energy to Change Company Name to Ørsted.
  23. Poullikkas, A., Kourtis, G. and Hadjipaschalis, I. 2013. A Review of Net Metering Mechanism for Electricity Renewable Energy Sources. International Journal of Energy and Environment 4(6): 975–1002.Google Scholar
  24. Rutherford, D. 2016. Size Matters for Aircraft Fuel Efficiency. Just Not in the Way That You Think.
  25. Strbac, G., Aunedi, M., Konstantelos, I., Moreira, R., Teng, F., Moreno, R., Pudjianto, D., Laguna, A. and Papadopoulos, P. 2017. Opportunities for Energy Storage: Assessing Whole-System Economic Benefits of Energy Storage in Future Electricity Systems. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 15: 32–41. Scholar
  26. The World Bank. 2014. Tuvalu—Energy Sector Development Project. s.l.: s.n.Google Scholar
  27. Torrealba, P.J.R. and DNVGL. 2016. The Benefits of Pumped Storage Hydro to the UK. London: DNVGL.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, I.A.G., McGregor, P.G. and Hall, P.J. 2010. Energy Storage in the UK Electrical Network: Estimation of the Scale and Review of Technology Options. Energy Policy 38(8): 4099–4106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Fredrick Crossland
    • 1
  1. 1.Durham Energy InstituteUniversity of DurhamDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations