Skip to main content

Re-making the Future: Transition Movements and Dismantling the Environment-Economy Dichotomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Managing Fossil Fuels and Energy Transitions

Abstract

Rapid changes in social, economic and environmental circumstances necessitate transitions to reconfigured social, economic and environment futures. The move to a low carbon future will be no different; fundamentally different social, economic and environmental futures will emerge. As globally adaptation to climate change dominates, different potential paths will be evident, each representing transition to a different potential low carbon future. This chapter argues that the current political debates about transitions to a low-carbon future are dominated by economic considerations, rather than environmental ones, reflecting the entrenched environment-economy dichotomy evident in the politics of nature liberal democracies and the modern state. Economic elites thus govern these discussions, failing to engage those whose futures are most at stake in the transition to a low-carbon future. Not surprisingly, these debates then also fail to engage with questions about just transitions, ignoring the equity and redistributive impacts of economic transformation. Despite this, major economic change offers the opportunity to re-write societal structures. In contrast to denialist and green capitalism discourses, transition movements have arisen, focussed on the idea of a just transition to a low-carbon, improved economic and environmental future for all. These movements are located at a number of key intersections that seek to unravel the environment-economy dichotomy inherent in contemporary capitalism. These include local food systems, small scale and alternative energy economies, sustainable communities and housing. Thus, current debates about transition to a low-carbon future represent a battle between competing futures globally. The outcome will transform global economic relations, global material flows and the current structures of power and economic flourishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aghion, P., Hepburn, C., Teytelboym, A. and Zenghelis, D. 2014. Path Dependence, Innovation and the Economics of Climate Change. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, G. 2012. Community Transitions to Low Carbon Futures in the Transition Towns Network (TTN). Geography Compass 6(2): 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altvater, E. 2007. The Social and Natural Environment of Fossil Capitalism. Socialist Register 43: 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, J., Kaidonis, M.A. and Andrew, B. 2010. Carbon Tax: Challenging Neoliberal Solutions to Climate Change. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21(7): 611–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, I. and Maresh, S. 2009. Scales and Networks of Neoliberal Climate Governance: The Regulatory and Territorial Logics of European Union Emissions Trading. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34(4): 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, P. 2015. The Political Economy of Localization in the Transition Movement. Community Development Journal 50(2): 312–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S., and Pollard, J. 2017. Geographies of Transition: Narrating Environmental Activism in an Age of Climate Change and ‘Peak Oil’. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(1): 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M., Rivers, N., Wigle, R., and Yonezawa, H. 2015. Carbon Tax and Revenue Recycling: Impacts on Households in British Columbia. Resource and Energy Economics 41: 40–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. and Naumann, M. 2017. Energy Democracy: Mapping the Debate on Energy Alternatives. Geography Compass 11(8): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benander, L., Horowitz, D.A. and Baker, I. 2017. New Economy Energy Cooperatives Bring Power to the People. In: Fairchild, D. and Weinrub, A. (Eds.) Energy Democracy. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, T., Brandt, E., Ehn, P. and Halse, J. 2015. Democratic Design Experiments: Between Parliament and Laboratory. CoDesign 11(3–4): 152–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R. 2002. Activism after Seattle: Dilemmas of the Anti-globalisation Movement. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security and Global Change 14(3): 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M. 1982. The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. Palo Alto, CA: Cheshire Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzarovski, S., Herrero, S. T., Petrova, S. and Ürge-Vorsatz, D. 2016. Unpacking the Spaces and Politics of Energy Poverty: Path-Dependencies, Deprivation and Fuel Switching in Post-communist Hungary. Local Environment 21(9): 1151–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, E., Boykoff, M. and Newell, P. 2011. The ‘New’ Carbon Economy: What’s New?. Antipode 43(3): 601–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, K. and Könninger, S. 2018. From Experiments to Ecosystems? Reviewing Public Participation, Scientific Governance and the Systemic Turn. Public Understanding of Science 27(6): 674–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breetz, H., Mildenberger, M. and Stokes, L. 2018. The Political Logics of Clean Energy Transitions. Business and Politics 20(4): 492–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. 2003. Australian Liberals and the Moral Middle Class: From Alfred Deakin to John Howard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. 2005. Relaxed and Comfortable: The Liberal Party’s Australia. Quarterly Essay, Issue 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H. 2005. Reconfiguring Environmental Governance: Towards a Politics of Scales and Networks. Political Geography 24(8): 875–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H. and Kern, K. 2006. Local Government and the Governing of Climate Change in Germany and the UK. Urban Studies 43(12): 2237–2259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M.J. and Stephens, J.C. 2017. Energy Democracy: Goals and Policy Instruments for Sociotechnical Transitions. Energy Research and Social Science 33: 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilvers, J. and Pallett, H. 2018. Energy Democracies and Publics in the Making: A Relational Agenda for Research and Practice. Frontiers in Communication 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00014.

  • Christoff, P. 1996. Ecological Modernisation, Ecological Modernities. Environmental Politics 5(3): 476–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciplet, D. and Roberts, J.T. 2017. Climate Change and the Transition to Neoliberal Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Change 46: 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, D. 2000. Income Inequality, Social Cohesion and the Health Status of Populations: the Role of Neo-Liberalism. Social Science and Medicine 51(1): 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, L., Benneworth, P. and Truffer, B. 2012. Toward a Spatial Perspective on Sustainability Transitions. Research Policy 41(6): 968–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Bosca, H. and Gillespie, J. 2018. The Coal Story: Generational Coal Mining Communities and Strategies of Energy Transition in Australia. Energy Policy 120: 734–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K.W. 1963. The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P. 2013. Think Global, Act Local? The Relevance of Place Attachments and Place Identities in a Climate Changed World. Global Environmental Change 23(1): 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. 1997. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiock, R.C. and Stream, C. 2001. Environmental Protection Versus Economic Development: A False Trade-Off?. Public Administration Review 61(3): 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felli, R. 2019. Beyond the Critique of Carbon Markets: The Real Utopia of a Democratic Climate Protection Agency. Geoforum 98: 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R.S. and Lovell, S.T. (2015). Grassroots Engagement with Transition to Sustainability: Diversity and Modes of Participation in the International Permaculture Movement. Ecology and Society 20(4). http://www.jstor.org/stable/26270300.

  • Ferrer-Fons, M. and Fraile, M. 2013. Political Consumerism and the Decline of Class Politics in Western Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 54(5–6): 467–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. 2017. Climate Crisis and the Democratic Prospect: Participatory Governance in Sustainable Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fotopoulos, T. 2001. Globalisation, the Reformist Left and the Anti-globalisation ‘Movement’. Democracy and Nature 7(2): 233–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. 2017. After the Brexit Referendum: Revisiting Populism as an Ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies 22(1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. 2017. Embedding Energy Transitions in the Community. In: Bouzarovski, S., Pasqualetti, M.J. and Broto, V.C. (Eds.) The Routledge research companion to energy geographies. New York: Routledge, pp. 265–276.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F.W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., Neukirch, M. and Wassermann, S. 2016. The Enactment of Socio-Technical Transition Pathways: A Reformulated Typology and a Comparative Multi-level Analysis of the German and UK Low-Carbon Electricity Transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy 45(4): 896–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, M. and Creamer, E. 2016. Assessing Diversity and Inclusivity Within the Transition Movement: An Urban Case Study. Environmental Politics 26(1): 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. and Star, C. 2007. Are They Hitting the Target? Climate Change Messages and Strategies by Australian NGOs. In: Ensor, J., Polak, I. and ven de Merwe, P. (Eds.) Other Contact Zones. Perth: Network Books, pp. 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, N. and Barry, J. 2017. Politicizing Energy Justice and Energy System Transitions: Fossil Fuel Divestment and a “Just Transition”. Energy Policy 108: 451–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hejny, J. 2018. The Trump Administration and Environmental Policy: Reagan Redux?. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 8(2): 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D.J. 2018. Energy Democracy and Social Movements: A Multi-coalition Perspective on the Politics of Sustainability Transitions. Energy Research and Social Science 40: 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S.B. 2016. The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent. Journal of European Public Policy 23(9): 1259–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, M. and Marvin, S. 2010. Can Cities Shape Socio-Technical Transitions and How Would We Know If They Were?. Research Policy 39(4): 477–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D. and Star, C. 2018. Climate Change Communication in Australia: The Politics, Mainstream Media and Fossil Fuel Industry Nexus. In: Leal Filho, W., Manolas, E., Azul, A.M., Azeiteiro, U.M. and McGhie, H. (Eds.) Handbook of Climate Change Communication: Vol. 1: Theory of Climate Change Communication. Cham: Springer, pp. 151–170.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hultgren, J. 2018. Those Who Bring from the Earth: Anti-environmentalism and the Trope of the White Male Worker. Ethics, Policy and Environment 21(1): 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeme, J. 2003. Equity, Environmental Justice and Sustainability: Incomplete Approaches in Climate Change Politics. Global Environmental Change 13(3): 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janković, V. and Bowman, A. 2014. After the Green Gold Rush: The Construction of Climate Change as a Market Transition. Economy and Society 43(2): 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, P. and Hielscher, S. 2017. Phasing Out Coal, Sustaining Coal Communities? Living with Technological Decline in Sustainability Pathways. The Extractive Industries and Society 4(3): 457–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, A. and Mathijs, E. 2014. (De)politicising the Local: The Case of the Transition Towns Movement in Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Rural Studies 34: 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinsky, S. and Dowlatabadi, H. 2011. Conceptualizations of justice in Climate policy. Climate Policy 9(1): 88–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koos, S. 2012. What Drives Political Consumption in Europe? A Multi-level Analysis on Individual Characteristics, Opportunity Structures and Globalization. Acta Sociologica 55(1): 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, B. 2016. Political Experiments That Matter: Ordering Democracy from Experimental Sites. Social Studies of Science 46(5): 773–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengnick, L., Miller, M. and Marten, G.G. 2015. Metropolitan Foodsheds: A Resilient Response to the Climate Change Challenge?. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5(4): 573–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobao, L., Zhou, M., Partridge, M. and Betz, M. 2016. Poverty, Place, and Coal Employment Across Appalachia and the United States in a New Economic Era. Rural Sociology 81(3): 343–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, M. 2018. Right-Wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages. Environmental Politics 27(4): 712–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, L. 2011. The Endless Algebra of Climate Markets. Capitalism Nature Socialism 22(4): 93–116.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • May, P. 2015. Implementation Failures Revisited: Policy Regime Perspectives. Public Policy and Administration 30(3–4): 277–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. and Dunlap, R. 2011. The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly 52(2): 155–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W. and Braungart, M. 2008. Remaking the Way We Make Things: Creating a New Definition of Quality with Cradle-to-Cradle Design. In: Marinova, D., Annandale, D. and Phillimore, J. (Eds.) The International Handbook on Environmental Technology and Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, D. 2018. From Malcolm Turnbull to ScoMo: Crisis for the Centre-Right in Australia. The Round Table 107(5): 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, S., Siriwardana, M. and McNeill, J. 2013. The Environmental and Economic Impact of the Carbon Tax in Australia. Environmental and Resource Economics 54(3): 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. H. and Roser, D. 2010. Climate Justice and Historical Emissions. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13(1): 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munck af Rosenschold, J. and Rozema, J.G. 2014. Institutional Inertia and Climate Change: A Review of the New Institutionalist Literature. WIREs Climate Change 5(5): 639–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D.M. 2016. Towards a Green Energy Economy? The EU Energy Union’s Transition to a Low-Carbon Zero Subsidy Electricity System—Lessons from the UK’s Electricity Market Reform. Applied Energy 179: 1321–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. and Mulvaney, D. 2013. The Political Economy of the ‘Just Transition’. The Geographical Journal 179(2): 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R.G. and Stavins, R.N. 2003. Cost Heterogeneity and the Potential Savings from Market-Based Policies. Journal of Regulatory Economics 23(1): 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, P. 2017. Transitioning Towards Low Carbon Solidarity Economies? In: North, P. and Cato, M.S. (Eds.) Towards Just and Sustainable Economies: The Social and Solidarity Economy: The Social Solidarity Economy North and South. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okereke, C. 2010. Climate Justice and the International Regime. WIREs Climate Change 1(3): 462–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okereke, C. and Coventry, P. 2016. Climate Justice and the International Regime: Before, During, and After Paris. WIREs Climate Change 7(6): 834–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. and Conway, E. M. 2010. Merchants of Doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornetzeder, M. and Rohracher, H. 2013. Of Solar Collectors, Wind Power, and Car Sharing: Comparing and Understanding Successful Cases of Grassroots Innovations. Global Environmental Change 23(5): 856–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, G. 2009. Quarry Vision: Coal, Climate Change and the End of the Resources Boom. Quarterly Essay 33: 1–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petridis, P., Muraca, B. and Kallis, G. 2015. Degrowth: Between a Scientific Concept and a Slogan for a Social Movement. In: Martinez-Alier, J. and Muradian R. (Eds.) Handbook for Ecological Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 176–200.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Belknap/Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn-Thibodeau, T. and Wu, B. 2016. NGOs and the Climate Justice Movement in the Age of Trumpism. Development 59: 251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J.T. and Parks, B.C. 2009. Ecologically Unequal Exchange, Ecological Debt, and Climate Justice: The History and Implications of Three Related Ideas for a New Social Movement. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50(3–4): 385–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemberg, A. 2010. Building a Just Transition: The Linkages Between Climate Change and Employment. International Journal of Labour Research 2(2): 125–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routledge, P., Cumbers, A. and Derickson, K.D. 2018. States of Just Transition: Realising Climate Justice Through and Against the State. Geoforum 88: 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. 2012. Climate Justice and Capabilities: A Framework for Adaptation Policy. Ethics and International Affairs 26(4): 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. 2019. From Postmaterialism to Sustainable Materialism: The Environmental Politics of Practice-Based Movements. Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1587215.

  • Schlosberg, D. and Coles, R. 2016. The New Environmentalism of Everyday Life: Sustainability, Material Flows and Movements. Contemporary Political Theory 15: 160–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. and Collins, L. 2014. From Environmental to Climate Justice: Climate Change and the Discourse of Environmental Justice. WIREs Climate Change 5(3): 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. and Cravin, L. 2019. Sustainable Materialism: Environmental Movements and the Politics of Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E.F. 1973. Small Is Beautiful: Economics as If People Mattered. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüssler, R. 2011. Climate Justice: A Question of Historic Responsibility?. Journal of Global Ethics 7(3): 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G. and Haxeltine, A. 2012. Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30(3): 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1068/c10222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. and Jones, R. 2015. From Big Society to Small State: Conservatism and the Privatisation of Government. British Politics 10(2): 226–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, J. 2012. Participatory Governance Reform: A Good Strategy for Increasing Government Responsiveness and Improving Public Services?. World Development 40(12): 2379–2398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, C. 2005. Notions of Ecological Citizenship in Climate Justice Campaigns. Ecopolitics XVI: Transforming Environmental Governance for the 21st Century, July 4–6, Griffith University, Brisbane. ISBN 190295239X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, C. 2012. A Tale of Two Movements? Environmental Non-government Organisations and Community Action on Climate Change. Social Alternatives 31(1): 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevis, D. and Felli, R. 2015. Global Labour Unions and Just Transition to a Green Economy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 15(1): 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulecki, K. 2018. Conceptualizing Energy Democracy. Environmental Politics 27(1): 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, A. 2019. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Can Teach Bill Shorten a Thing or Two About Climate Change Policy. The Guardian, March 11. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/mar/11/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-can-teach-bill-shorten-a-thing-or-two-about-climate-change-policy.

  • Thorleifsson, C. 2016. From Coal to Ukip: The Struggle Over Identity in Post-industrial Doncaster. History and Anthropology 27(5): 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tienhaara, K. 2010. A Tale of Two Crises: What the Global Financial Crisis Means for the Global Environmental Crisis. Environmental Policy and Governance 20(3): 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truffer, B. and Coenen, L. 2012. Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies. Regional Studies 46(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velicu, I. and Kaika, M. 2017. Undoing Environmental Justice: Re-imagining Equality in the Rosia Montana Anti-mining Movement. Geoforum 84: 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vona, F. 2019. Job Losses and Political Acceptability of Climate Policies: Why the ‘Job-Killing’ Argument Is So Persistent and How to Overturn It. Climate Policy 19(4): 524–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, L., Ross, I., Foster, J. and Hankamer, B. 2016. Trading Off Global Fuel Supply, CO2 Emissions and Sustainable Development. PLoS ONE 11(3): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, S., van Bueren, M. and Collins, D. 2003. An Overview of Market-Based Instruments and Environmental Policy in Australia. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual AARES National Symposium, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Canberra, pp. 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cassandra Star .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Star, C. (2020). Re-making the Future: Transition Movements and Dismantling the Environment-Economy Dichotomy . In: Wood, G., Baker, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Managing Fossil Fuels and Energy Transitions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28076-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28076-5_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28075-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28076-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics