Advertisement

Developing SPI Culture in the SME Arena: An Exploratory Study

  • Mary Sánchez-Gordón
  • Ricardo Colomo-PalaciosEmail author
Conference paper
  • 883 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1060)

Abstract

The modern workplace has become gradually more complex as a result of numerous aspects, including technological and economic growth. Software development companies are not an exception; teams are implemented in order to facilitate high performance within these complex, dynamic conditions. One of the challenges they face is training. New team members are unfamiliar with the way of working and therefore require more attention in a hands-on learning environment. Likewise, training is also necessary when new ways of working are required. In this paper, authors present an exploratory study on the deployment of an approach to software improvement training in the context of a small software company. As a result, the participants felt that they improved their knowledge and most of them were more encouraged to know more about the topic. Although online training (synchronous mode) was delivered, after almost all training sessions, the levels of arousal and pleasure were incremented. Finally, the holistic view of training process in this context gives the authors the confidence in the alignment of the training goals and business goals.

Keywords

Synchronous training Human factors Software process improvement Small company 

References

  1. 1.
    World Economic Forum: The Global Competitiveness Report (2017–2018), Geneva (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noe, R.A., Clarke, A.D.M., Klein, H.J.: Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Ann. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1, 245–275 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao, J., Qi, Z., de Pablos, P.O.: Enhancing enterprise training performance: perspectives from knowledge transfer and integration. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 567–573 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galin, D.: Staff skills and knowledge - training and certification. In: Software Quality: Concepts and Practice, p. 720. Wiley-IEEE Press (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119134527.ch23
  6. 6.
    Colomo-Palacios, R., Casado-Lumbreras, C., Soto-Acosta, P., Misra, S., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Analyzing human resource management practices within the GSD context. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 15, 30–54 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conboy, K., Coyle, S., Wang, X., Pikkarainen, M.: People over process: key challenges in agile development. IEEE Softw. 28, 48–57 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2010.132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pham, R., Kiesling, S., Singer, L., Schneider, K.: Onboarding inexperienced developers: struggles and perceptions regarding automated testing. Softw. Qual. J. 25, 1239–1268 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-016-9333-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ray, D.M., Samuel, P.: Synchronous training in distributed software development team. In: 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 315–319 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2015.7375337
  10. 10.
    Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C.: Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 119, 87–108 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bernando Estácio, R., Prikladnicki, M.M., Notari, G., Caroli, P., Olchik, A.: Software Kaizen: using agile to form high-perfomance software development teams. In: 2014 Agile Conference, pp. 1–10 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2014.10
  12. 12.
    Oyetoyan, T.D., Cruzes, D.S., Jaatun, M.G.: An empirical study on the relationship between software security skills, usage and training needs in agile settings. In: 2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES), pp. 548–555 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2016.103
  13. 13.
    Skov, M.B., Stage, J.: Training software developers and designers to conduct usability evaluations. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31, 425–435 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290903398208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Javdani Gandomani, T., Zulzalil, H., Abdul Ghani, A.A., Md. Sultan, A.B., Meimandi Parizi, R.: The impact of inadequate and dysfunctional training on Agile transformation process: a grounded theory study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 57, 295–309 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.05.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vijayasarathy, L., Turk, D.: Drivers of agile software development use: dialectic interplay between benefits and hindrances. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54, 137–148 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prochazka, J., Kokott, M., Chmelar, M., Krchnak, J.: Keeping the spin – from idea to cash in 6 weeks: success story of agile/lean transformation. In: 2011 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Global Software Engineering, pp. 124–130 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2011.19
  17. 17.
    Vaasanthi, R., Prasanna, V., Philip, S.: Adopting SHU-HA-RI training methodology with scrum framework in DevOps space. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 166, 28–32 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017914055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niazi, M., Mishra, A., Gill, A.Q.: What do software practitioners really think about software process improvement project success? An exploratory study. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 1–17 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3140-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanchez-Gordon, M.L., O’Connor, R.V., Colomo-Palacios, R.: Evaluating VSEs viewpoint and sentiment towards the ISO/IEC 29110 standard: a two country grounded theory study. In: Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2015. CCIS, vol. 526, pp. 114–127. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19860-6_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J.: SPI Manifesto. http://www.iscn.com/Images/SPI_Manifesto_A.1.2.2010.pdf
  21. 21.
    Enriquez, C., Gil, P.G.: A model for improving training of software developers in small companies. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 13, 1453–1461 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2015.7112002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tanrıöver, Ö.Ö., Demirörs, O.: A process capability based assessment model for software workforce in emergent software organizations. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 37, 29–40 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2014.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kosa, M., Yilmaz, M.: Designing games for improving the software development process. In: O’Connor, R., et al. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. CCIS, vol. 543, pp. 303–310. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    de A. Souza, M.R., Veado, L., Moreira, R.T., Figueiredo, E., Costa, H.: A systematic mapping study on game-related methods for software engineering education. Inf. Soft. Technol. 95, 201–218 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pedreira, O., García, F., Brisaboa, N., Piattini, M.: Gamification in software engineering – a systematic mapping. Inf. Softw. Technol. 57, 157–168 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Herranz, E., Colomo-Palacios, R., de Amescua Seco, A., Sánchez-Gordón, M.-L.: Towards a gamification framework for software process improvement initiatives: construction and validation. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 22, 1509–1532 (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aydan, U., Yilmaz, M., O’Connor, R.V.: Towards a serious game to teach ISO/IEC 12207 software lifecycle process: an interactive learning approach. In: Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2015. CCIS, vol. 526, pp. 217–229. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19860-6_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bellotti, F., Kapralos, B., Lee, K., Moreno-Ger, P., Berta, R.: Assessment in and of serious games: an overview. Adv. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2013, 1–11 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/136864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martin, F., Parker, M.A.: Use of synchronous virtual classrooms: why, who, and how? J. Online Learn. Teach. 10, 19 (2014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Adams, E.: Fundamentals of Game Design, 2nd edn. New Riders (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sánchez-Gordón, M.-L., de Amescua, A., O’Connor, R.V., Larrucea, X.: A standard-based framework to integrate software work in small settings. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 54, 162–175 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.11.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sanchez-Gordón, M.-L., O’Connor, R.V., Colomo-Palacios, R., Herranz, E.: Bridging the gap between SPI and SMEs in educational settings: a learning tool supporting ISO/IEC 29110. In: Kreiner, C., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2016. CCIS, vol. 633, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Betella, A., Verschure, P.F.M.J.: The affective slider: a digital self-assessment scale for the measurement of human emotions. PLoS ONE 11, e0148037 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abuhamdeh, S., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivated goal-directed activities. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38, 317–330 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211427147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bell, B.S., Tannenbaum, S.I., Ford, J.K., Noe, R.A., Kraiger, K.: 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. J. Appl. Psychol. 102, 305–323 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Granda, J.C., Nuño, P., Suárez, F.J., Pérez, M.A.: E-pSyLon: a synchronous e-learning platform for staff training in large corporations. Multimed. Tools Appl. 66, 431–463 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1061-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Østfold University CollegeHaldenNorway

Personalised recommendations