Advertisement

Development Needs of the OSH-Related Risk Management Process: A Companies’ Viewpoint

  • Noora NenonenEmail author
  • Johanna Pulkkinen
  • Sanna Anttila
  • Jouni Kivistö-Rahnasto
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)

Abstract

Occupational safety and health (OSH) legislation, as well as OSH practitioners, generally consider the practices of risk management (RM) to be the foundation for OSH management in the workplace, and RM practices are commonly used in this setting. In practice, carrying out RM can be difficult. To ensure the effective improvement of RM practices, this paper examines the current development needs workplaces encounter in practice. Interviews (n = 46) were carried out in four large-scale Finnish enterprises operating in the manufacturing industry and facility services. The interviewees most often mentioned development needs related to the activity and competence of the persons involved in RM, and the process and tools used in RM. Companies would benefit from better descriptions and communication of the roles and responsibilities related to the RM process. It would be interesting to examine whether increased utilization of electronic systems can improve the success of OSH-related RM.

Keywords

Hazard recognition Risk identification Risk assessment Workplace safety Manufacturing industry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to sincerely thank the Finnish Work Environment Fund for the funding for this study, as well as the companies that participated.

References

  1. 1.
    Council Directive 89/391/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Finnish Occupational Safety and Health Act 2002/783 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Workers’ Compensation Center: Työtapaturmien määrä ja tapaturmataajuus kääntyivät nousuun vuonna 2017. Workers’ Compensation Center (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Workers’ Compensation Center: Työtapaturmatja tapaturmataajuus kääntyivät lievään nousuun vuonna 2015. Workers’ Compensation Center (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Workers’ Compensation Center: Työtapaturmat – Tilastojulkaisu 2015. Workers’ Compensation Center (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eurostat: Health and safety at work in Europe (1999–2007): a statistical portrait. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Albert, A., Hallowell, M.R., Kleiner, B.: Enhancing construction hazard recognition and communication with energy-based cognitive mnemonics and safety meeting maturity model: multiple baseline study. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE 140, 04013042 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bahn, S.: Workplace hazard identification and management: the case of an underground mining operation. Saf. Sci. 57, 129–137 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carter, G., Smith, S.: Safety hazard identification on construction projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE 132, 197–205 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haslam, R.A., Hide, S.A., Gibb, A.G.F., Gyi, D.E., Pavitt, T., Atkinson, S., Duff, A.R.: Contributing factors in construction accidents. Appl. Ergon. 36, 401–415 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duijim, N.J.: Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices. Saf. Sci. 76, 21–31 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johansen, I.L., Rausand, M.: Ambiquity in risk assessment. Saf. Sci. 80, 243–251 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goerlandt, F., Reniers, G.: On the assessment of uncertainty in risk diagrams. Saf. Sci. 84, 67–77 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lanne, M., Heikkilä, J.: Uutta riskienarviointiin! Tietopohjan merkitys ja uudistamisen keinot. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Espoo (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Niskanen, T., Kallio, H., Naumanen, P., Lehtelä, J., Liuhamo, M., Lappalainen, J., Sillanpää, J., Nykyri, E., Zitting, A., Hakkola, M.: Riskienarviointia koskevien työturvallisuus- ja työterveyssäännösten vaikuttavuus. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Helsinki (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Albert, A., Hallowell, M.R., Skaggs, M., Kleiner, B.: Empirical measurement and improvement of hazard recognition skill. Saf. Sci. 93, 1–8 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S.: Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 1–19. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ministry of Social Affairs and Health: Riskienarviointityöpaikalla – työkirja. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health and The Centre for Occupational Safety (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nenonen, N., Kivistö-Rahnasto, J., Anttila, S.: How workplaces actually carry out OSH-related risk assessment and management. In: Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on the Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Washington D.C., USA, 24–28 July 2019Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Conchie, S.M., Moon, S., Duncan, M.: Supervisors’ engagement in safety leadership: factors that help and hinder. Saf. Sci. 51, 109–117 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hale, A.R., Guldenmund, R.F., van Loenhout, P.L.C.H., Oh, J.I.H.: Evaluating safety management and culture interventions to improve safety: effective intervention strategies. Saf. Sci. 48(8), 1026–1035 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tappura, S., Nenonen, N.: Categorization of effective safety leadership facets. In: Arezes, P., Carvalho, P. (eds.) Ergonomics and Human Factors in Safety Management, pp. 367–383. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noora Nenonen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Johanna Pulkkinen
    • 1
  • Sanna Anttila
    • 2
  • Jouni Kivistö-Rahnasto
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Industrial Engineering and ManagementTampere UniversityTampereFinland
  2. 2.Environment and Health, HSEQ-ManagementRamboll Finland OyTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations