Advertisement

Digital Human Modelling in Research and Development – A State of the Art Comparison of Software

  • David Pal BorosEmail author
  • Karoly Hercegfi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)

Abstract

This paper carries out a comparison of three Digital Human Modelling (DHM) software. They are compared to each other in the field of ergonomics with a larger focus on their ergonomic risk assessment capabilities. They were selected from a pool of ergonomic software. The selection was restricted to those programs which gave enough information to overview features and capabilities without purchasing the given software. The software included here are namely: Jack, Santos and ViveLab. Jack is a software by Siemens, Santos belongs to SantosHuman Inc. and ViveLab is newly developed Hungarian software by ViveLab Ergo Ltd. These software companies provide free material for their software overview and online tutorials free of charge to make the acquiring process easier for their customers.

Keywords

DHM Digital Human Modeling Santos ViveLab Jack HFE Risk analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.: Human factor risk management in the process industry: a case study. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 169, 149–159 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fruggiero, F., Riemma, S., Ouazene, Y., Macchiaroli, R., Guglielmi, V.: Incorporating the human factor within manufacturing dynamics. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49, 1691–1696 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mearns, K.: Human Factors in the Chemical Process Industries. Methods in Chemical Process Safety, pp. 149–200 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cagno, E., Micheli, G., Masi, D., Jacinto, C.: Economic evaluation of OSH and its way to SMEs: a constructive review. Saf. Sci. 53, 134–152 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fitz-enz, J.: The ROI of Human Capital. AMACOM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Punnett, L., Wegman, D.: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 14, 13–23 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Punnett, L., Fine, L., Keyserling, W., Herrin, G., Chaffin, D.: Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 17, 337–346 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liebers, F., Brendler, C., Latza, U.: Alters- und berufsgruppenabhängige Unterschiede in der Arbeitsunfähigkeit durch häufige Muskel-Skelett-Erkrankungen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 56, 367–380 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nguyen, T., Kleinsorge, M., Postawa, A., Wolf, K., Scheumann, R., Krüger, J., Seliger, G.: Human centric automation: using marker-less motion capturing for ergonomics analysis and work assistance in manufacturing processes. In: Proceedings of the 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing (GCSM), pp. 586–592. Innovative Solutions, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen, T., Bloch, C., Krüger, J.: The working posture controller: automated adaptation of the work piece pose to enable a natural working posture. Procedia CIRP 44, 14–19 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goodacre, B., Goodacre, C., Baba, N., Kattadiyil, M.: Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J. Prosthet. Dent. 116, 249–256 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cuillière, J., François, V., Souaissa, K., Benamara, A., BelHadjSalah, H.: Automatic comparison and remeshing applied to CAD model modification. Comput.-Aided Des. 43, 1545–1560 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blanchonette, P.: Jack human modelling tool: a review. Sci. Technol. 1–37 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Polášek, P., Bureš, M., Šimon, M.: Comparison of digital tools for ergonomics in practice. Procedia Eng. 100, 1277–1285 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berlin, C., Adams, C.: Production Ergonomics. Ubiquity Press, London (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Puthenveetil, S., Daphalapurkar, C., Zhu, W., Leu, M., Liu, X., Gilpin-Mcminn, J., Snodgrass, S.: Computer-automated ergonomic analysis based on motion capture and assembly simulation. Virtual Reality 19, 119–128 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stanton, N.: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Standoli, C., Lenzi, S., Lopomo, N., Perego, P., Andreoni, G.: Using Digital Human Modeling to Evaluate Large Scale Retailers’ Furniture: Two Case Studies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 512–521 (2018)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Premananth, S., Dharmar, G., Krishnan, H., Mohammed, R.: Development of Indian Digital Simulation Model for Vehicle Ergonomic Evaluations. SAE Technical Paper Series (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ergonomics and PsychologyBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations