Advertisement

Maturity Analysis of Safety Performance Measurement

  • Aki JääskeläinenEmail author
  • Sari Tappura
  • Julius Pirhonen
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)

Abstract

Organizations have several indicators for their safety performance. However, the use of performance indicators often fails to create overall insights on the level of safety and the various factors affecting it. Performance indicators could be better utilized in safety-related decision-making. Maturity models have been presented in many different managerial fields, but no such models for safety performance measurement can be identified. Maturity analysis can provide information on why performance measurement utilization is flawed and how can it be improved. The aim of this paper is to design and test a maturity model for safety performance measurement. The study presents an approach for evaluating maturity which combines written descriptions of best practices, the overall satisfaction of employees in the evaluated aspects, and the experienced level of safety performance.

Keywords

Performance measurement Safety performance Maturity analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the research funding provided by the Finnish Work Environment Fund, participating companies, and Tampere University.

References

  1. 1.
    Podgórski, D.: Measuring operational performance of OSH management system – a demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Saf. Sci. 73, 146–166 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reiman, T., Pietikäinen, E.: Leading indicators of system safety – monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential. Saf. Sci. 50, 1993–2000 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bititci, U.S., Ackermann, F., Ates, A., Davies, J., Garengo, P., Gibb, S., MacBryde, J., Mackay, D., Maguire, C., van der Meer, R., Shafti, F., Bourne, M., Firat, S.U.: Managerial processes: business process that sustain performance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 31(8), 851–891 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bourne, M., Franco-Santos, M., Kennerley, M., Martinez, V.: Reflections on the role, use and benefits of corporate performance measurement in the UK. Meas. Bus. Excell. 9(3), 36–41 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tappura, S., Sievänen, M., Jussila, A., Heikkilä, J., Nenonen, N.: A management accounting perspective on safety. Saf. Sci. 71, Part B, 151–159 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jääskeläinen, A., Roitto, J.M.: Designing a model for profiling organizational performance management. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 64(1), 5–27 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Aken, E.M., Letens, G., Coleman, G.D., Farris, J., Van Goubergen, D.: Assessing maturity and effectiveness of enterprise performance measurement systems. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 54(5/6), 400–418 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wettstein, T., Kueng, P.A.: A maturity model for performance measure systems. In: Brebbia, C., Pascola, P. (eds.) Management Information Systems: GIS and Remote Sensing, pp. 113–122. WIT Press, Southampton (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goncalves Filho, A.P., Waterson, P.: Maturity models and safety culture: a critical review. Saf. Sci. 105, 192–211 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maier, A.M., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P.: Assessing organizational capabilities: reviewing and guiding the development of maturity grids. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 59(1), 138–159 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bititci, U.S., Garengo, P., Ates, A., Nudurupati, S.S.: Value of maturity models in performance measurement. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(10), 3062–3085 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goncalves Filho, A.P., Andrade, J.C.S., Marinho, M.M.O.: A safety culture maturity model for petrochemical companies in Brazil. Saf. Sci. 48, 615–624 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaassis, B., Badri, A.: Development of a preliminary model for evaluating occupational health and safety risk management maturity in small and medium-sized enterprises. Safety 4(5) (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parker, D., Lawrie, M., Hudson, P.: A framework for understand the development of organizational safety culture. Saf. Sci. 44, 551–562 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Aken, J.E.: Design science and organization development interventions aligning business and humanistic values. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 43(1), 67–88 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Bruin, T., Rosemann, M., Freeze, R., Kulkarni, U.: Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In: Campbell, B., Underwood, J., Bunker, D. (eds.) Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Sydney, 30 November–2 December (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., Platts, K.: Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 20(7), 754–771 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nudurupati, S.S., Bititci, U.S., Kumar, V., Chan, F.T.: State of the art literature review on performance measurement. Comput. Ind. Eng. 60(2), 279–290 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jääskeläinen, A., Sillanpää, V.: Overcoming challenges in the implementation of performance measurement: case studies in public welfare services. Int. J. Pub. Sect. Manag. 26(6), 440–445 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kennerley, M., Neely, A.: A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manang. 22(11), 1222–1245 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J., Vázquez-Ordás, C.: Safety culture: analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. J. Saf. Res. 38, 627–641 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tangen, S.: Demystifying productivity and performance. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 54(1), 34–46 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cocca, P., Alberti, M.: A framework to assess performance measurement systems in SMEs. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 59(2), 186–200 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Das, A., Pagell, M., Behm, M., Veltri, A.: Toward a theory of the linkages between safety and quality. J. Oper. Manag. 26(4), 521–535 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marx, F., Wortmann, F., Mayer, J.H.: A maturity model for management control systems. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 4(4), 193–207 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brondino, M., Silva, S.A., Pasini, M.: Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: co-workers as the missing link. Saf. Sci. 50, 1847–1856 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tung, A., Baird, K., Schoch, H.P.: Factors influencing the effectiveness of performance measurement systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 31(12), 1287–1310 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J., Vázquez-Ordás, C.: Relation between occupational safety management and firm performance. Saf. Sci. 47, 980–991 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Richards, H., Gregory, M., Bourne, M., Kennerley, M.: Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 20(10), 1119–1145 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Najmi, M., Rigas, J., Fan, I.: A framework to review performance measurement systems. Bus. Process Manag. J. 11(2), 109–122 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maier, A.M., Eckert, C.M., Clarkson, J.P.: Identifying requirements for communication support: a maturity grid-inspired approach. Exp. Syst. Appl. 31(4), 663–672 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Garengo, P., Biazzo, S., Bititci, U.S.: Performance measurement systems in SMEs: a review for a research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 7(1), 25–47 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aki Jääskeläinen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sari Tappura
    • 1
  • Julius Pirhonen
    • 1
  1. 1.Tampere University, Management and BusinessTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations