Displaying Vehicle Driving Mode – Effects on Pedestrian Behavior and Perceived Safety
Abstract
The type and amount of information pedestrians should receive while interacting with an autonomous vehicle (AV) remains an unsolved challenge. The information about the vehicle driving mode could help pedestrians to develop the right expectations regarding further actions. The aim of this study is to investigate how the information about the vehicle driving mode affects pedestrian crossing behavior and perceived safety. A controlled field experiment using a Wizard-of-Oz approach to simulate a driverless vehicle was conducted. 28 participants experienced a driverless and a human-operated vehicle from the perspective of a pedestrian. The vehicle was equipped with an external human machine interface (eHMI) that displayed the driving mode of the vehicle (driverless vs. human-operated). The results show that the crossing behavior, measured by critical gap acceptance, and the subjective reporting of perceived safety did not differ statistically significantly between the driverless and the human-operated driving condition.
Keywords
Vehicle driving mode Automation status Pedestrian behavior Perceived safety Human machine interface Human machine interactionNotes
Acknowledgments
The present study was supported by the project @CITY-AF which receives funding from the German Federal Ministry of Economy and Energy (BMWi).
References
- 1.Schieben, A., Wilbrink, M., Kettwich, C., Madigan, R., Louw, T., Merat, N.: Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: design considerations based on human needs and expectations. Cogn. Technol. Work 21, 69–85 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Rodríguez Palmeiro, A., van der Kint, S., Vissers, L., Farah, H., de Winter, J.C.F., Hagenzieker, M.: Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 58, 1005–1020 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ackermann, C., Beggiato, M., Schubert, S., Krems, J.F.: An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? Appl. Ergon. 75, 272–282 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.de Clerq, K., Dietrich, A., Núñez Valesco, J.P., de Winter, J., Happee, R.: External human-machine interfaces on automated vehicles: effects on pedestrians crossing decisions. Hum. Factors (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819836343
- 5.OECD: Behavioural adaptation to changes in the road transport system, Paris (1990)Google Scholar
- 6.Jiang, C., Underwood, G., Horwarth, C.I.: Towards a theoretical model for behavioural adaptations to changes in the road transport system. Transp. Rev. 12, 253–263 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Vaa, T.: Psychology of Behavioural Adaptation. In: Rudin-Brown, C.M., Jamson, S.L. (eds.) Behavioural Adaptation and Road Safety, pp. 207–226. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Joisten, P., Müller, A., Walter, J., Abendroth, B., Bruder, R.: Neue Ansätze der Human Factors Forschung im Zeitalter des Hochautomatisierten Fahrens. In. Bruder, R., Winner, H. (eds.) Hands off, Human Factors off? Welche Rolle spielen Human Factors in der Fahrzeugautomation? 9. Darmstädter Kolloquium, pp. 69–88. Darmstadt (2019)Google Scholar
- 9.Selkowitz, A.R., Lakhmani, S.G., Chen, J.Y.C.: Using agent transparency to support situation awareness of the Autonomous Squad Member. Cogn. Syst. Res. 46, 13–25 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hulse, L.M., Xie, H., Galea, E.R.: Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risks, gender and age. Saf. Sci. 102, 1–13 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar