Advertisement

Providing Peripheral Trajectory Information to Avoid Motion Sickness During the In-car Reading Tasks

  • Yi-Ting MuEmail author
  • Wei-Chi Chien
  • Fong-Gong Wu
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)

Abstract

Carsickness is one of the most common types of motion sickness. It can be resulted by unanticipated body motion, which mismatches our anticipation of movement. However, related studies tend to increase user’s visual information which instead affects the possibility of doing non-driving tasks. Therefore, matching sensory signals and engaging in the performance of non-driving tasks will be the key to improving user requirements. The experiment, which we choose to carry on a vehicle, analyses subjective ratings of motion sickness, in order that the user not only releases carsickness symptom, but also obtains a meaningful and rich traveling experience (in-vehicle reading). The result and experience shall be able to be applied in other related design research about physiological issues of future technology, such as motion sickness in autonomous driving or virtual reality.

Keywords

Motion sickness Carsickness Sensory conflict 

References

  1. 1.
    Meixner, G., Häcker, C., Decker, B., Gerlach, S., Hess, A., Holl, K.,…Orfgen, M.: Retrospective and future automotive infotainment systems—100 years of user interface evolution. In: Meixner, G., Müller, C. (eds.) Automotive User Interfaces: Creating Interactive Experiences in the Car. Human–Computer Interaction Series, pp. 3–54. Springer, Cham (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., de Winter, J.C.F.: Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 32, 127–140 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reason, J.T., Brand, J.J.: Motion Sickness. Academic Press, London (1975)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Treisman, M.: Motion sickness: an evolutionary hypothesis. Science 197(4302), 493–495 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rolnick, A., Lubow, R.: Why is the driver rarely motion sick? the role of controllability in motion sickness. Ergonomics 34(7), 867–879 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffin, M.J., Newman, M.M.: Visual field effects on motion sickness in Cars. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75(9), 739–748 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuiper, O.X., Bos, J.E., Diels, C.: Looking forward: in-vehicle auxiliary display positioning affects carsickness. Appl. Ergon. 68, 169–175 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krueger, W.W.: Controlling motion sickness and spatial disorientation and enhancing vestibular rehabilitation with a user-worn see-through display. Laryngoscope. 121(2), 17–35 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tal, D., Gonen, A., Wiener, G., Bar, R., Gil, A., Nachum, Z., Shupak, A.: Artificial horizon effects on motion sickness and performance. Otol. Neurotol. 33(5), 878–885 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karjanto, J., Md. Yusof, N., Wang, C., Terken, J., Delbressine, F., Rauterberg, M.: The effect of peripheral visual feedforward system in enhancing situation awareness and mitigating motion sickness in fully automated driving. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 58, 678–692 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Veen, T., Karjanto, J., Terken, J.: Situation awareness in automated vehicles through proximal peripheral light signals. In: 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 287–292. ACM Press, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bos, J.E.: Less sickness with more motion and/or mental distraction. J. Vestib. Res. 25(1), 23–33 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial DesignNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations