Advertisement

Empirical Assessment of Cyber-physical Systems Influence on Industrial Service Sector: The Manufacturing Industry as a Case Study

  • Ifetayo OluwafemiEmail author
  • Timothy Laseinde
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)

Abstract

This study examines service innovation in the manufacturing sector which is largely due to the adoption of digitalization and cyber-physical systems. It assesses their influence on the service environment and the long-term effect, based on unprecedented rapid automation witnessed since the dawn of the fourth industrial revolution. Besides the normal business of selling manufactured goods, manufacturing firms are becoming more competitive in their services by engaging in product-related after-market services all through their product lifecycle. The study was carried out using an exploratory method and the findings were primarily qualitative. The study findings showed that the emergence of cyber-physical systems and smart technologies have completely revolutionized and catalyzed more opportunities in the service business rendering throughout product lifecycle. The opportunities created are not limited to maintenance, repair and overhaul service business, but other emerging services, enhanced by cyber-physical systems. Based on the case studies examined in this study, the affordance that could realistically utilize the emerging services were identified.

Keywords

Industrialization Product-service systems Cyber-physical Lifecycle Automation Transformation Manufacturing 

References

  1. 1.
    Cavalieri, S., Pezzotta, G.: Product–service systems engineering: state of the art and research challenges. Comput. Ind. 63(4), 278–288 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mont, O.K.: Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J. Clean. Prod. 10(3), 237–245 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tukker, A.: Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review. J. Clean. Prod. 97, 76–91 (2015). https://0-doi-org.ujlink.uj.ac.za/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Windahl, C., Lakemond, N.: Developing integrated solutions: the importance of relationships within the network. Ind. Mark. Manage. 35(7), 806–818 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doni, F., Corvino, A., Martini, S.B.: Servitization and sustainability actions. Evidence from European manufacturing companies. J. Environ. Manage. 234, 367–378 (2019). https://0-doi-org.ujlink.uj.ac.za/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huxtable, J., Schaefer, D.: On servitization of the manufacturing industry in the UK. Proc. CIRP, 52, 46–51 (2016). https://0-doi-org.ujlink.uj.ac.za/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kastalli, I.V., Van Looy, B.: Servitization: disentangling the impact of service business model innovation on manufacturing firm performance. J. Oper. Manage. 31(4), 169–180 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mastrogiacomo, L., Barravecchia, F., Franceschini, F.: A general overview of manufacturing servitization in Italy. Proc. CIRP, 64, 121–126 (2017). https://0-doi-org.ujlink.uj.ac.za/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, J.H., Lin, L., Chen, D.P., Ma, L.Y.: An empirical study of servitization paradox in China. J. High Technol. Manage. Res. 26(1), 66–76 (2015). https://0-doi-org.ujlink.uj.ac.za/10.1016/j.hitech.2015.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rymaszewska, A., Helo, P., Gunasekaran, A.: IoT powered servitization of manufacturing – an exploratory case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 192, 92–105 (2017). https://0-doi-org.ujlink.uj.ac.za/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vandermerwe, S., Rada, J.: Servitization of business: adding value by adding services. Eur. Manag. J. 6(4), 314–324 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guidat, T., Barquet, A., Widera, H., Rozenfeld, H., Seliger, G.: Guidelines for the definition of innovative industrial product-service systems (PSS) business models for remanufacturing. Proc. CIRP 16, 193–198 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Everhartz, J., Maiwald, K., Wieseke, J.: Identifying and analyzing the customer situation: drivers for purchasing industrial product service systems. Proc. CIRP 16, 308–313 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: From goods to service(s): divergences and convergences of logics. Ind. Mark. Manage. 37(3), 254–259 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maiwald, K., Wieseke, J., Everhartz, J.: The dark side of providing industrial product-service systems–perceived risk as a key challenge from a customer-centric point of view. Proc. Cirp 16, 241–246 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mikusz, M.: Towards an understanding of cyber-physical systems as industrial software-product-service systems. Proc. CIRP 16, 385–389 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Annunziata, M., Evans, P.C.: Industrial internet: pushing the boundaries of minds and machines. General Electric (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Postgraduate School of Engineering ManagementUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgRepublic of South Africa
  2. 2.Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Tech DeptUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations