Advertisement

Plant Layout Model for Improving Footwear Process Times in Micro and Small Enterprises

  • Nataly GutierrezEmail author
  • Wendy JaimesEmail author
  • Fernando SoteloEmail author
  • Carlos RaymundoEmail author
  • Francisco DominguezEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1026)

Abstract

The manufacturing specifications used by small leather and footwear businesses are neither up to date nor based on innovative production and new technologies. Consequently, their production times are higher, rendering them unable to sufficiently compete against other developed countries. Thus, this study seeks an innovative way to reduce times that do not add value to the product, such as reducing travel distances between stations, and proposes improving procedures for a better monitoring of the resources required. As a whole, this proposal focuses on designing a model to minimize the displacement of different processes. This practice is currently being implemented in the manufacturing sector, but not in the footwear sector. The proposal provides broad results, saving around 33% in transfer times and 85% in distance traveled in footwear production.

Keywords

Footwear company Design 5s method Value chain mapping 

References

  1. 1.
    Ali Naqvi, S.A., Fahad, M., Atir, M., Zubair, M., Shehzad, M.M.: Productivity improvement of a manufacturing facility using systematic layout planning. Cogent Eng. 3(1) (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1207296
  2. 2.
    Yang, T., Su, C., Hsu, Y.: Systematic layout planning: a study on semiconductor wafer fabrication facilities. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 20(11), 1359–1371 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010348299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alvarez, K., Aldas, D., Reyes, J.: Towards lean manufacturing from theory of constraints: a case study in footwear industry. In: 2017 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Application (ICIMSA), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMSA.2017.7985615
  4. 4.
    Ahmad, M.O., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., Oivo, M.: Kanban in software engineering: a systematic mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 137, 96–113 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rojas, C., Quispe, G., Raymundo, C.: Lean optimization model for managing the yield of pima cotton (gossypium barbadense) in small-and medium-sized farms in the peruvian coast. In: 2018 Congreso Internacional de Innovacion y Tendencias en Ingenieria, CONIITI 2018 - Proceedings 8587062 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ingeniería IndustrialUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)LimaPeru
  2. 2.Dirección de InvestigaciónUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)LimaPeru
  3. 3.Escuela Superior de Ingeniera InformáticaUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations