Advertisement

Analysis of the Familiar Functioning of Amazonian Riverside Communities: Ecological Engagement, Naturalistic Observations, and Use of Structured Situations

  • Simone Souza da Costa Silva
  • Fernando Augusto Ramos Pontes
  • Sarah Daniele Baia da Silva
  • Daniele Castro Reis
  • Leila Said Assef Mendes
Chapter

Abstract

The investigation of family functioning, more than characterizing the structure of the studied families, also makes it possible to know ethnographically the culture of the studied population. From an Ecological Engagement perspective, it intends to an epistemological approach that aims both to unveil a structure and a family dynamic and reveal the ethnography profile of the culture in which these families are involved. Using the research experience of an Amazonian riverside community this chapter proposes to exemplify a strategy that combines naturalistic observations and the use of structured situations. It is understood that the instruments of evaluation of the structure and dynamics depend on the process of Ecological Engagement, with particular emphasis on the field notes. Three types of structured situations are described, based on traditional procedures from the familiar systemic perspective, namely: the miriti, the problem solutions, and the photos. In the end, the aspects of how the Ecological Engagement is a methodological strategy that allows both the development and adequacy of a particular methodology as well as the analysis of a given development context are discussed.

Keywords

Family structure and dynamics Naturalistic observations Structured situations Amazonian riverside people 

References

  1. Ab’saber, A. (2002). Bases for the study of the ecosystems of the Brazilian Amazon. Revista Estudo Avançado, 16(45). São Paulo: USP/Advanced Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, P. (2000). Bases of family therapy. Portugal: Climepsi.Google Scholar
  3. Bodin, A. (1968). Conjoint family assessment: An evolving field. In P. McReynolds (Org.). Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. I). Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1994). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Portugal: Porto Editora.Google Scholar
  5. Brandão, Z. (2000). Between questionnaires and interviews. In M. A. Nogueira, G. Romanelli, & N. Zago (Eds.), Family & school (pp. 171–183). Rio de Janeiro: Voices.Google Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1996). The ecology of human development: Natural and planned experiments (M. A. V. Veronese, Trad.). Porto Alegre: Medical Arts. (Original work published 1976).Google Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In B. L. Friedmann & T. D. Wachs (Orgs.), Conceptualization and assessment of environment across life span (pp. 3–30). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  8. Carneiro, T. F. (1983). Family: Diagnosis and therapy. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editors.Google Scholar
  9. Cecconello, A. M. (2003). Resilience and vulnerability in families at risk. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Postgraduate Course in Developmental Psychology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS.Google Scholar
  10. Cecconello, A., & Koller, S. H. (2003). Ecological engagement in the community: A methodological proposal for the study of families at risk. Psychology: Reflection and Criticism, 16(3), 515–524.Google Scholar
  11. De Antoni, C. (2005). Cohesion and hierarchy in families with a history of physical abuse. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Postgraduate Course in Developmental Psychology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS.Google Scholar
  12. De Antoni C., & Koller S. H. (2000). The family view among adolescents who suffered intrafamily violence. Studies of Psychology, Natal, 5, 347–381.Google Scholar
  13. De Antoni, C., & Koller, S. (2001). The ecological psychologist in the institutional context: An experience with girls who were victims of violence. Psychology Science and Profession, 21, 14–29.Google Scholar
  14. Durham, E. (2004). The dynamics of culture: Essays on anthropology. São Paulo: Cosac Naify.Google Scholar
  15. Eaton, C. B. (1988). The Family Apperception Test: A study of the validity of a long and short form. Unpublished thesis masters, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.Google Scholar
  16. Eschiletti-Prati, L., de Couto, M. C. P. P., Moura, A., Poletto, M., & Koller, S. H. (2008). Revisiting the ecological engagement: A proposal to systematization. Psicologia. Reflexão e Crítica, 21, 160–169.Google Scholar
  17. Fraxe, T. J. P. (2000). Amphibian men: An ethnography of the peasantry of the waters. São Paulo: Annablume.Google Scholar
  18. Gehring, T. M. (1998). Family-system-test (FAST). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  19. Governo do Estado do Pará. (2007). Plano de desenvolvimento territorial sustentável do Arquipélago do Marajó. Grupo Executivo do Estado do Pará. Decreto de 30 de julho de 2007. Belém, PA.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, A. G. (2000). Life on the amazon: The anthropology a Brazilian peasant village. New York: Oxford University Press/The British Academy.Google Scholar
  21. Lundquist, A. (1987). A projective approach to family systems assessment: A preliminary validity study of the Family Apperception Test. Unpublished master’s thesis, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.Google Scholar
  22. Mendes, L. S. A., Pontes, F. A. R., da Silva, S. S. C., Bucher-Maluschke, J. S. N. F., dos Reis, D. C., & da Silva, S. D. B. (2008). Ecological engagement in the context of an Amazonian riverine community. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 42, 1–10.Google Scholar
  23. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Morais, N. A. (2005). Saúde e doença em crianças e adolescentes em situação de rua: Concepções e experiência. Master’s thesis, Postgraduate Course in Developmental Psychology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS.Google Scholar
  25. Neiva-Silva, L. (2003). Future expectations of adolescents in the street: An auto-photographic study. Unpublished Master’s Dissertation, Postgraduate Course in Developmental Psychology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS.Google Scholar
  26. Noda, S. N., Noda, H., Pereira, H. S., & Martins, A. L. U. (2001). Utilization and appropriation of land by Amazonian family agriculture of floodplains. In A. C. Diegues & A. C. Moreira (Eds.), Spaces and natural resources in common use (pp. 181–204). Center for Research Support on Human Populations and Brazilian Wetlands, University of São Paulo.Google Scholar
  27. Olson, D. H., Portner, J., & Bell, R. (1982). Family adaptability & cohesion evaluation (FACES II). Manual published by the University of Minnesota, Family Social Science Department, 55108, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Olson, D. H., Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985). FACES III manual. St. Paul: Department of Family Social Sciences, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  29. Scherer, E. F. (2003). Social policies for water peoples. Notebooks of the CEAS, 207, 91–107.Google Scholar
  30. Scherer, E. F. (2004a). The closure and the defense of the environment. In II Congress of the National Association of Postgraduate and Research in Environment and Society, 2004, Indaiatuba. II Congress of the Association of Research and Post-Graduation in Environment and Society. Campinas: Publisher of Unicamp.Google Scholar
  31. Scherer, E. F. (2004b). Earth-Water mosaic: The riverside social vulnerability in the Amazon. In: Proceedings of the VIII Luso-Afro-Brazilian Congress of Social Sciences. Coimbra: Afrontamento.Google Scholar
  32. Sotile, W. M., Julian III, A., Henry, S. E., & Sotile, M. O. (1991). Family apperception test: Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  33. Teodoro, M. L. M. (2006). Affectivity and conflict in family dyads: Evaluation with Familiograma. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 40, 385–390.Google Scholar
  34. Teodoro, M. L. M., & Käppler K. C. (2003). Familiograma: Development of a new instrument for the evaluation of family relationships (Developmental Psychopathology—Technical Reports, pp. 2–21). Laboratory of Developmental Neuropsychology and Laboratory of Family Psychology.Google Scholar
  35. Wagley, C. (1952). Man in the Amazon. Gainesville: The University Press of Florida.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Souza da Costa Silva
    • 1
  • Fernando Augusto Ramos Pontes
    • 1
  • Sarah Daniele Baia da Silva
    • 1
  • Daniele Castro Reis
    • 2
  • Leila Said Assef Mendes
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade Federal do ParáBelémBrazil
  2. 2.Universidade Federal Rural da AmazôniaManausBrazil

Personalised recommendations