Advertisement

Racial Futurity: Biolegality and the Question of Black Life

  • Nadine EhlersEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Biolegalities book series (BIOGA)

Abstract

This chapter considers how IVF donor insemination technologies can open the possibilities for the denial of black life. It asks: how might the birth of black child to a white mother—by way of donor insemination—be conceived as a “wrongful birth,” as it was in the 2014 Illinois Northern District Court case of Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank? How is it that someone’s race—in this case the blackness of a newborn—can be viewed and used as a measure of injury (against a white parent) for which compensation or legal reparation was demanded? And, lastly, what does this case reflect about the perceived value—or lack thereof—of black life in America and the possibilities of and for racial futurity, understood as the guarantee of life’s continuation? Cramblett squarely placed the question of the valuation of black life before the law, which was used here to adjudicate the personal rights of the mother against her child. In this assessment of biolegality, fundamental questions of the intersections of law, biology, and society are brought into stark relief, highlighting the challenges presented through bioscientific-technological interventions into “life itself.”

Bibliography

  1. Armstrong A & Plowden, TC 2012, ‘Ethnicity and assisted reproductive technologies’, Clinical Practice (London), vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 651–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bliss, C 2012, Race decoded: the genomic fight for social justice, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  3. Bliss, J 2015, ‘Hope against hope: queer negativity, black feminist theorizing, and reproduction without futurity’, Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, LXZ 2018, ‘Legal ableism, interrupted: developing tort law and policy alternatives to wrongful birth and wrongful life claims’, Disability Studies Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, n.p.Google Scholar
  5. Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank, LLC, ‘Complaint for Wrongful Birth and Breach of Warranty’, 29 September 2014. Circuit Court of Cooks County, Illinois.Google Scholar
  6. Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank, LLC. No. 15 L 000282, ‘Midwest Sperm Bank LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint at Law’, 2015. Circuit Court of Cooks County, Illinois.Google Scholar
  7. Cuevas, M 2014, ‘Ohio woman sues sperm bank after racial mix-up’, CNN, 2 October, viewed 15 November 2018, https://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/02/us/sperm-bank-race-lawsuit/index.html.
  8. Daniels, CR & Heidt-Forsythe, E 2012, ‘Gendered eugenics and the problematic of free market reproductive technologies: sperm and egg donation in the United States’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 719–747.Google Scholar
  9. Dillon, M & Neal, AW 2008, Foucault on politics, security and war, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.Google Scholar
  10. Duster, T 2005, ‘Medicine, race and reification in science’, Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), vol. 307, pp. 1050–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehlers, N 2011, ‘Onerous passions: colonial anti-miscegenation rhetoric and the history of sexuality’, Patterns of Prejudice, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elster, NR 2005, ‘ART for the masses? Racial and ethnic inequality in assisted reproductive technologies’, DePaul Journal of Health Care Law, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 719–733.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M 2003, Society must be defended: lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976, Picador, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Fox, D 2009, ‘Racial classification in assisted reproduction’, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 188, pp. 1844–1898.Google Scholar
  15. Gates, HL 1987, Figures in black: words, signs, and the ‘racial’ self, Oxford University Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
  16. Ginsburg, FD & Rapp, R 1995, Conceiving the new world order: the global politics of reproduction, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  17. Goldberg, DT 1992, ‘The semantics of race’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 15, pp. 543–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris, C 1993, ‘Whiteness as property’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 106, no. 8, pp. 1707–1791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartman, S 1997, Scenes of subjection: terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Hartman, S 2007, Lose your mother: a journey along the Atlantic slave route, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Hartman, S 2014, ‘The value of whiteness: a lawsuit is being waged against the “wrongful birth” of a black child’, The Nation, 12 November, viewed 11 August 2018, https://www.thenation.com/article/value-whiteness/.
  22. Heidt-Forsythe, E 2017, ‘Morals or markets? Regulating assisted reproductive technologies as morality or economic policies in the states’, AJOB Empirical Bioethics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holland, SP 2012, The erotic life of racism, Duke University Press, Durham and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Humphries, LA, Change, O, Humm, K, Sakkas, D & Hacker, M 2016, ‘Influence of race and ethnicity on in vitro fertilization outcomes: systematic review’, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 212–224.Google Scholar
  25. Kearl, MK 2018, ‘The stolen property of whiteness: a case study in critical intersectional rhetorics of race and disability’, Rhetoric Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 300–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knowles, LP & Kaebnick, GE 2007, Reprogenetics: law, policy, and ethical issues, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  27. Lenhardt, RA 2017, ‘The color of kinship’, Lowa Law Review, vol. 102, pp. 2071–2107.Google Scholar
  28. Lenon, S & Peers, D 2017, ‘‘Wrongful’ inheritance: race, disability and sexuality’, Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank, Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 25, pp. 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. López, IH 1996, White by law: the legal construction of race, New York University Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
  30. Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Driscoll, AK & Drake, P 2018, ‘Births: final data for 2017’, National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 67, no. 8. National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, viewed 15 November 2018, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_08-508.pdf.
  31. Mamo, L 2005, ‘Biomedicalizing kinship: sperm banks and the creation of affinity-ties’, Science as Culture, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McQueen, DB, Schufreider, A, Lee, SM, Feinberg, EC & Uhler, ML 2015, ‘Racial disparities in in vitro fertilization outcomes’, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 398–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murphy, M 2017, The economization of life, Duke University Press Books, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson, A 2016, The social life of DNA: race, reparations, and reconciliation after the genome, Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  35. Omi, M & Winant, H 1986, Racial formation in the United States: from the 1960s to the 1980s, Routledge, New York and London.Google Scholar
  36. Quiroga, SS 2007, ‘Blood is thicker than water: policing donor insemination and the reproduction of whiteness’, Hypatia, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Regalado, A 2015, ‘Engineering the perfect baby’, MIT Technology Review, May/June, viewed 11 November 2018, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/535661/engineering-the-perfect-baby/.
  38. Roberts, D 2009, ‘Race, gender, and genetic technologies: a new reproductive dystopia?’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 783–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell, C 2015, ‘The race idea in reproductive technologies: beyond epistemic scientism and technological mastery’, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, vol. 12, pp. 601–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shange, S 2014, ‘Black on purpose: race, inheritance and queer reproduction’, The Feminist Wire, 10 October, viewed 1 November 2018, http://thefeministwire.com/2014/10/black-purpose-race-inheritance-queer-reproduction/.
  41. Spillers, H 1987, ‘Mama’s baby, Papa’s maybe: an American grammar book’, Diacritics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ward, Clifford 2015, ‘Suit filed over mix-up at Downers Grove sperm bank is dismissed’, Chicago Tribune, 3 September, viewed 15 November 2018, https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/downers-grove/news/ct-dupage-sperm-bank-suit-met-0904-20150903-story.html.
  43. Zack, N (ed.) 2000, Race/sex: their sameness, difference and interplay, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Zuberi, T 2001, Thicker than blood: how racial statistics lie, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social PolicyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations