Advertisement

Conclusion: Moving Forward

  • Mariann MärtsinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Sociocultural Psychology of the Lifecourse book series (SPL)

Abstract

The concluding chapter brings together the main ideas discussed in the book. It returns to the idea that identity construction can be seen as part of the ongoing meaning-making process and as a semiotic border-making process, where borders between various others, between self and others, and between past, present and future self are constantly drawn and redrawn. In this chapter, it is argued that identity construction involves the crossing and maintaining, creating and dismantling of borders across two dimensions: spatial borders between self and others and temporal borders between past and future. The chapter discusses how these ideas could be advanced in future theorising and research.

Keywords

Identity construction Meaning-making Borders Border-making process Self Others 

References

  1. Abbey, E., & Surgan, S. (Eds.). (2012). Developing methods in psychology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blatterer, H. (2007). Contemporary adulthood. Reconceptualizing an uncontested category. Current Sociology, 55(6), 771–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Español, A., Marsico, G., & Tateo, L. (2018). Maintaining borders: From border guards to diplomats. Human Affairs: Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly, 28(4), 443–460.  https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Levinson, D. J. (1986). A conception of adult development. American Psychologist, 41, 3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Levitan, D. (2019). The art of living in transitoriness: Strategies of families in repeated geographical mobility. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 53, 258–282.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9448-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marsico, G. (2016). The borderland. Culture & Psychology, 22(2), 206–215.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X15601199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marsico, G., & Tateo, L. (2017). Borders, tensegrity and development in dialogue. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 51(4), 536–556.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9398-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stenner, P. (2017). Liminality and experience. A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  10. Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology. Have 60 years gone astray? Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Valsiner, J. (2017). From methodology to methods in human psychology. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zittoun, T., Levitan, D., & Cangiá, F. (2018). A sociocultural approach to mobile families: A case study. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(4), 424–432.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zittoun, T., Valsiner, J., Vedeler, D., Salgado, J., Gonçalves, M. M., & Ferring, D. (2013). Human development in the life course. Melodies of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NeuchâtelInstitute of Psychology and EducationNeuchâtelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations