Advertisement

Identity Development in a Semiotic Cultural Key

  • Mariann MärtsinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Sociocultural Psychology of the Lifecourse book series (SPL)

Abstract

How can identity be thought of as a process that is always changing and evolving, yet also provides a sense of sameness and continuity across time and space? This chapter is guided by this question, as it provides an overview of the key conceptual tools that informed the research presented in this book and were developed through the case studies. Building on contemporary semiotic cultural psychology, the chapter introduces the idea that identity construction can be understood as part of our ongoing meaning-making process and identity can be seen as a field of hyper-generalised meta-signs about who we are, have been and are becoming that emerges as a by-product of this process and becomes activated in moments of rupture.

Keywords

Identity construction Meaning-making Sign Rupture Transition Semiotic cultural psychology 

References

  1. Abbey, E. (2004). Circumventing ambivalence in identity: The importance of latent and overt aspects of symbolic meaning. Culture & Psychology, 10(3), 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbey, E. (2007a). At the boundary of me and you: Semiotic architecture of thinking and feeling the other. In L. M. Simão & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Otherness in question. Labyrinths of the self (pp. 73–92). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Abbey, E. (2007b). Perpetual uncertainty of cultural life: Becoming reality. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 362–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abbey, E., & Valsiner, J. (2004). Emergence of meanings through ambivalence [58 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Online Journal], 6(1), Art 23.Google Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bastos, A. C. (2017). Shadow trajectories: The poetic motion of motherhood meanings through the lens of lived temporality. Culture & Psychology, 23(3), 408–422.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X16655458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergson, H. (1907). Loov evolutsioon [Creative evolution] (M. Ott & H. Sahkai, Trans.). Tallinn: Imamaa.Google Scholar
  8. Bertau, M.-C. (2007). Encountering objects and others as a means of passage. Culture & Psychology, 13(3), 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bühler, C., & Massarik, F. (Eds.). (1968). The course of human life. A study of goals in the humanistic perspective. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Costall, A. (2007). The windowless room: ‘Mediationism’ and how to get over it. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 109–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crafter, S., Maunder, R., & Soulsby, L. (2019). Developmental transitions: Exploring stability and change through the lifespan. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  14. Diriwächter, R., & Valsiner, J. (2005). Qualitative developmental research methods in their historical and epistemological contexts [53 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Online Journal], 7(1), Art 8.Google Scholar
  15. Dodds, A. E., Lawrence, J. A., & Valsiner, J. (1997). The personal and the social: Mead’s theory of the ‘generalized other’. Theory & Psychology, 7(4), 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Español, A., Marsico, G., & Tateo, L. (2018). Maintaining borders: From border guards to diplomats. Human Affairs: Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly, 28(4), 443–460.  https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Falmagne, R. J. (2004). On the constitution of ‘self’ and ‘mind’. Theory & Psychology, 14(6), 822–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuhrer, U. (2004). Cultivating minds. Identity as meaning-making practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Gillespie, A. (2005). GH Mead: Theorist of the social act. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(1), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greco, M., & Stenner, P. (2017). From paradox to pattern shift: Conceptualising liminal hotspots and their affective dynamics. Theory & Psychology, 27(2), 147–166.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317693120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holland, D., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (2001). History in person. Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  24. Josephs, I. E. (2002). ‘The hopi in me’: The construction of a voice in the dialogical self from a cultural psychological perspective. Theory & Psychology, 12, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kloep, M., & Hendry, L. B. (2011). A systemic approach to the transitions to adulthood. In J. J. Arnett, M. Kloep, L. B. Hendry, & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Debating emerging adulthood: Stage or process? (pp. 53–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Lawrence, J. A., & Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual roots of internalization: From transmission to transformation. Human Development, 36(1), 150–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawrence, J. A., & Valsiner, J. (2003). Making personal sense. An account of basic internalization and externalization processes. Theory & Psychology, 13(6), 723–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levine, D. N. (Ed.). (1971). Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms. Selected writings. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Marková, I. (2003). Constitution of the self: Intersubjectivity and dialogicality. Culture & Psychology, 9(3), 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marsico, G. (2016). The borderland. Culture & Psychology, 22(2), 206–215.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X15601199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marsico, G., & Tateo, L. (2017). Borders, tensegrity and development in dialogue. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 51(4), 536–556.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9398-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Märtsin, M. (2010). Identity in dialogue: Identity as hyper-generalized personal sense. Theory & Psychology, 20, 436–450.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310363513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Märtsin, M. (2018). On the possibility of becoming otherwise. In B. Wagoner, I. Bresco, & S. Zadeh (Eds.), Memory in the wild (p. TBC). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  35. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Motzkau, J. F., & Clinch, M. (2017). Managing suspended transition in medicine and law: Liminal hotspots as resources for change. Theory & Psychology, 27(2), 270–289.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317700517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peirce, C. S. (1932). On sign. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Volume II). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rosa, A. (2007). Dramaturgical actuations and symbolic communication. Or how beliefs make up reality. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 293–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roth, W. M. (2007). The ethico-moral nature of identity: Prolegomena to the development of third-generation cultural-historical activity theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1–2), 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salvatore, S. (2015). Psychology in black and white: The project of a theory-driven science. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Salvatore, S. (2018). Culture as dynamics of sense-making. A semiotic and embodied framework for socio-cultural psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 35–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Unresolved tensions in sociocultural theory: Analogies with contemporary sociological debates. Culture & Psychology, 8(3), 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shotter, J. (2003). ‘Real presences’: Meaning as living movement in a participatory world. Theory & Psychology, 13, 435–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shotter, J. (2008). Conversational realities revisited: Life, language, body and world. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute.Google Scholar
  45. Sonesson, G. (2010). Here comes the semiotic species: Reflections on the semiotic turn in the cognitive sciences. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Symbolic transformation. The mind in movement through culture and society (pp. 38–58). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Stenner, P. (2017). Liminality and experience. A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  47. Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2004). The self in cultural-historical activity theory. Theory & Psychology, 14(4), 475–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Szakolczai, A. (2015). Liminality and experience. Structuring transitory situations and transformative events. In A. Horvath, B. Thomassen, & H. Wydra (Eds.), Breaking boundaries: Varieties of liminality (pp. 11–38). New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Szakolczai, Á. (2017). Permanent (trickster) liminality: The reasons of the heart and of the mind. Theory & Psychology, 27(2), 231–248.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317694095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tateo, L., & Marsico, G. (2013). The self as tension of wholeness and emptiness. Interaccoes, 9(24), 1–19.Google Scholar
  52. Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. A sociogenetic approach to personality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Valsiner, J. (2002). Forms of dialogical relations and semiotic autoregulation within the self. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Valsiner, J. (2005). Scaffolding within the structure of dialogical self: Hierarchical dynamics of semiotic mediation. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(3), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Valsiner, J. (2007a). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  57. Valsiner, J. (2007b). Human development as migration: Striving toward the unknown. In Otherness in question: Labyrinths of the self (pp. 349–378). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Valsiner, J. (2007c). Semiotic autoregulation: Dynamic sign hierarchies constraining the stream of consciousness. Sign System Studies, 35(1/2).Google Scholar
  59. Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Valsiner, J. (2017). From methodology to methods in human psychology. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Valsiner, J., & Diriwächter, R. (2008). Conclusion: Returning to the whole—A new theoretical synthesis in the social sciences. In Striving for the whole: Creating theoretical synthesis (pp. 211–237). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  62. Valsiner, J., & Van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Van der Veer, R. (1994). Pierre Janet’s relevance for a socio-cultural approach. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Explorations in socio-cultural studies. Vol. 1. Historical and theoretical discourse (pp. 205–209). Madrid: Fundación Infancia y Aprendizaje.Google Scholar
  64. Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, volume I. Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  67. Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models—Representations and the scientific understanding. Dodrecht and Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
  69. Zittoun, T. (2004). Symbolic competencies for developmental transitions: The case of the choice of first names. Culture & Psychology, 10(2), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zittoun, T. (2007a). Dynamics of interiority. Ruptures and transitions in the self development. In L. M. Simão & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Otherness in question. Labyrinths of the self (pp. 187–214). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  71. Zittoun, T. (2007b). Symbolic resources in dialogue, dialogical symbolic resources. Culture & Psychology, 13(3), 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zittoun, T. (2007c). The role of symbolic resources in human lives. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 343–361). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zittoun, T. (2012). Life-course: A socio-cultural perspective. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 513–535). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Zittoun, T., Duveen, G., Gillespie, A., Ivinson, G., & Psaltis, C. (2003). The use of symbolic resources in developmental transitions. Culture & Psychology, 9(4), 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NeuchâtelInstitute of Psychology and EducationNeuchâtelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations